[00:00:01]
[OPENING ITEMS]
WELCOME.IT IS NOW THREE 30 AND I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND CALL OUR UH, MEETING TO ORDER.
THE FIRST ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, SO IF YOU'LL PLEASE STAND WITH ME.
I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE.
FOR ALL, HONOR THE TEXAS FLAG.
I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE TEXAS ONE STATE UNDER GOD, ONE AND INDIVISIBLE.
NEXT WE WILL HAVE OUR PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD.
DURING THIS TIME WE WILL, WE WILL RECEIVE COMMENTS FROM MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO DESIRE TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGARDING ITEMS ON THE PRESENT AGENDA FOR WHICH PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL NOT BE HELD.
WE WILL LIMIT THESE COMMENTS TO THREE MINUTES.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO COME AND SPEAK AT THIS TIME? ALRIGHT, NOT SEEING ANYONE.
[CONSENT AGENDA]
NEXT WE HAVE OUR CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS NUMBER TWO AND THREE.DO WE HAVE ANY OF THESE ITEMS THAT WISH TO BE PULLED FROM THE COMMISSION? ALRIGHT THEN DO I HEAR ANY MOTIONS? MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.
I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE FROM COMMISSIONER CIGA AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER GARZA.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALRIGHT, LET'S VOTE.
NEXT WE WILL GO INTO OUR PUBLIC HEARINGS.
I WILL GO AHEAD AND READ OUR UH PROCEDURES FOR THE PUBLIC HEARINGS AS FOLLOWS.
FIRST, THE STAFF WILL PRESENT ITS EVALUATION OF EACH REQUEST.
NEXT, THE APPLICANT WILL PRESENT THE REQUEST AND RESPOND TO ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.
THEN THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE REQUEST WILL ADDRESS THE COMMISSION.
THEN THOSE WHO ARE OPPOSED TO THE REQUEST OR WHO WISH ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL ADDRESS THE COMMISSION.
NEXT, THE APPLICANT WILL THEN HAVE A FINAL OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS ANY OF THE REMARKS FROM THE PUBLIC.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL THEN BE CLOSED.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC WILL BE HEARD ONLY IF A MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION DESIRES TO DIRECT A QUESTION EITHER TO THE APPLICANT OR A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC.
FINALLY, THE COMMISSION WILL CONSIDER ALL OF THE INFORMATION PRESENTED AND VOTE ON THE MATTER.
[4. - Hold a public hearing and consider a request by Stephen Lindsey, on behalf of GTHCC 2017, LLC, for a Specific Use Designation with Term for the sale of all Alcoholic Beverages for on-premises consumption in a Restaurant for a 1,763 square foot portion of Lot 2, Block 1, Country Villa Estates, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located on the north side of West Wall Street, approximately 270 feet east of South Midland Drive.) (DISTRICT: 2) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]
HEARING IS ITEM NUMBER FOUR.HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST BY STEVEN LINDSAY ON BEHALF OF G-T-H-C-C 2017 LLC FOR A SPECIFIC USE DESIGNATION WITH TERM FOR THE SALE OF ALL ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES FOR ON-PREMISE CONSUMPTION IN A RESTAURANT FOR A 1,763 SQUARE FOOT PORTION OF LOT TWO BLOCK ONE COUNTY VIA ESTATES CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS.
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WEST WALL STREET, APPROXIMATELY 270 FEET EAST OF SOUTH MIDLAND DRIVE.
THANK YOU CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS ALEXIS TO PRESENT.
ITEM NUMBER FOUR, SPECIFIC USE DESIGNATION FOR THE GRAND TEXAN HOTEL ON BEHALF OF STEVEN LINDSAY ON 4,300 WEST WALL FOR THE SALE OF ALCOHOL PREMISES ON CONSUMPTION FOR A RESTAURANT BAR, IT IS FOR AN EXISTING HOTEL RESTAURANT AREA.
UM, THE SQUARE FOOTAGE IS 1,763 SQUARE FEET BUT THE SERVICEABLE AREA WILL BE 668 SQUARE FEET.
THE HOURS OF OPERATION WILL BE MONDAY THROUGH SUNDAY FROM SEVEN TO TWO.
THE CELL OF ALCOHOL WILL BE MONDAY THROUGH SATURDAY SEVEN TO TWO, SUNDAY 10 TO TWO.
THE CURRENT ZONING IS COMMERCIAL WITH THE SURROUNDING ZONINGS TO THE SOUTH IS UH, TECHNOLOGY PARK AND HEAVY INDUSTRIAL NORTHWEST AND EAST IS COMMERCIAL DISTRICT.
THE LAND USE, THE CURRENT USE RIGHT NOW IS A HOTEL RESTAURANT BAR SURROUNDING USES TO THE NORTHEAST IS AN AUTOMOTIVE SHOP, WEST'S RETAIL STORES AND SHOPS AND SOUTH IS INDUSTRIAL USE.
IT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE TALL CITY TOMORROW.
PLAN, UM, THERE IS NO CHURCHES OR SCHOOLS, PUBLIC SCHOOLS, ANYTHING WITHIN 300 FEET.
WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY OBJECTIONS AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL WITH THE STANDARD SUD CONDITIONS
[00:05:01]
OPEN TO.ANY QUESTIONS, ANYTHING FOR STAFF? THANK YOU SO MUCH.
I WILL OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING.
IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? I DON'T SEE THE APPLICANT.
ALRIGHT, IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS REQUEST? SEEING NONE.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO IS OPPOSED TO THIS REQUEST OR WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION? SEEING NONE, I WILL CLOSE OUR PUBLIC HEARING AND WE WILL GO TO THE COMMISSION.
ALRIGHT, I HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL BY COMMISSIONER MARTIN SECOND.
I'M IN A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER BARRY.
IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS MATTER? ALL RIGHT, LET'S VOTE.
[5. - Hold a public hearing and consider a request by David Chin for a Specific Use Designation with Term for the sale of all alcoholic beverages on premises consumption in a Lounge on the east 50 feet of Lots 10 through 12, Block 61, Original Town, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located on the south side of West Wall Street, approximately 110 feet east of South Carrizo Street.) (DISTRICT: 3) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]
ITEM NUMBER FIVE, HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST BY DAVID CHIN FOR A SPECIFIC USE DESIGNATION WITH TERM FOR THE SALE OF ALL ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES.ON ON-PREMISE CONSUMPTION IN A LOUNGE ON THE EAST 50 FEET OF LOTS, 10 THROUGH 12 BLOCK, 61 ORIGINAL TOWN, CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS.
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WEST WALL STREET, APPROXIMATELY 110 FEET EAST OF SOUTH CARRIZO STREET.
THANK YOU CHAIR COMMISSIONERS ALEXIS TO PRESENT ITEM NUMBER FIVE FOR HOT SHOTS.
UM, Y'ALL HAVE SEEN THIS ONE BEFORE.
WHICH CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDED APPRO UM, APPROVAL OF THIS TO REMOVE THE SECURITY GUARDS AND THE REVIEWS.
SO IT'S JUST COMING BACK TO YOU FOR THE PROCESS AS IT HAS TO 'CAUSE CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDED I'M OPEN TO ANY QUESTIONS.
IT WILL STILL HAVE THE STANDARD SUD CONDITIONS THOUGH, CORRECT? THANK YOU.
ANYTHING FOR OUR STAFF? THANK YOU.
OPENING UP THE PUBLIC HEARING.
IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK OR JUST DEFER TO THAT? I'M STILL GONNA KEEP THE SECURITY GUARDS ON THE WEEKENDS, YOU KNOW, JUST TO, JUST TO MAINTAIN EVERYTHING THAT WE GOT.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS REQUEST? SEEING NONE.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO IS OPPOSED OR WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION? ALRIGHT, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND I WILL TAKE ANY MOTIONS.
ALRIGHT, I'LL SECOND HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE FROM COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER OFIELD.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? LET'S VOTE.
[6. - Hold a public hearing and consider a request by Jose and Isabel Hernandez for a Zone Change from TP, Technology Park District to MH, Manufactured Housing District on Lots 1 through 10, Block 7, Moore Addition, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located at the southeast corner of the intersection of West Montgomery Avenue and Goode Street.) (DISTRICT: 2) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]
NUMBER SIX, HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST BY JOSE AND ISABEL HERNANDEZ FOR A ZONE CHANGE FROM TP TECHNOLOGY PARK DISTRICT TO MH MANUFACTURED HOUSING DISTRICT ON LOTS ONE THROUGH 10.BLOCK SEVEN MOORE EDITION, CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS.
GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF WEST MONTGOMERY AVENUE AND GOOD STREET AFTERNOON CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS LORI ELLIOT PLANNER TO PRESENT.
UM, ITEM SIX ON THE AGENDA'S ZONE CHANGE SUBMITTED BY JOSE AND ISABEL HERNANDEZ FOR THE PROPERTY AT 1415 WEST MONTGOMERY AVENUE IN DISTRICT TWO.
THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED, EXCUSE ME, TP TECHNOLOGY PARK DISTRICT AND THEY'RE REQUESTING A ZONE CHANGE TO MH MANUFACTURED HOUSING IN ORDER TO PLACE MOBILE HOMES ON THE VACANT LOTS.
THE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH AND EAST ARE ZONED, UM, MH MANUFACTURED HOUSING DISTRICT AND THE PROPERTIES TO THE SOUTH AND WEST ARE ZONED TP TECHNOLOGY PARK.
UM, THE CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY IS VACANT LAND AND A MOBILE HOME AND THE PROPOSED USE OF THE PROPERTY IS FOR UH, MANUFACTURED HOMES ON THE VACANT LAND.
THE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH AND EAST CONSIST OF VACANT LOTS AND RESIDENCES.
UH, TO THE SOUTH IS VACANT LAND AND TO THE WEST ARE VACANT LOTS AND COMMERCIAL SHOPS.
THIS IS A SITE PHOTO OF THE PROPERTY FROM WEST MONTGOMERY AVENUE LOOKING SOUTH.
PLAN DESIGNATES THIS PROPERTY AS URM URBAN RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM, WHICH SUPPORTS A MIX OF DIFFERENT HOUSING STYLES TO INCLUDE SINGLE FAMILY TOWN HOMES AND MANUFACTURED HOUSING.
THE REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE TALL CITY TOMORROW PLAN AND THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.
NO OBJECTIONS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST AND I CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE.
ANY QUESTIONS FOR OUR STAFF? OKAY, THANK YOU LAURIE.
[00:10:01]
YOU.I'LL OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING.
IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? I WON'T SEE THE APPLICANT.
SO IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS REQUEST? SEEING NONE, IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO IS OPPOSED OR WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION? ALRIGHT, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND I'LL GO TO THE COMMISSION MOTION FOR COURT.
I HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL BY COMMISSIONER BARRY SECOND AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER MARTIN.
IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? LET'S VOTE PARDON SOME TECHNICAL DISRUPTIONS.
[7. - Hold a public hearing and consider a Preliminary Plat of High School Addition, Section 2, being a replat of all of Lot 1 and the east half of Lot 2, Block 25, High School Addition, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located at the southwest corner of the intersection of West Cuthbert Avenue and North B Street.) (DISTRICT: 3) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]
SEVEN, HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF HIGH SCHOOL EDITION SECTION TWO BEING A REPL OF ALL OF LOT ONE AND THE EAST HALF OF LOT TWO.BLOCK 25 HIGH SCHOOL EDITION CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF WEST CUTHBERT AVENUE AND NORTH B STREET.
AFTERNOON CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS LORI ELLIOT PLANNER TO PRESENT.
ITEM SEVEN ON THE AGENDAS OF PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTED BY MAVERICK ENGINEERING ON BEHALF OF BRADLEY EDGAR FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED 9 0 1 WEST CUTHBERT IN DISTRICT THREE.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO PLA 0.24 ACRES INTO ONE LOT TO CORRECT THE PROPERTY LINES.
THE PROPERTY IS ZONED SF ONE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT AND THE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH ARE IN A PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROPERTIES TO THE SOUTHEAST AND WEST ARE ALL SF ONE AS WELL.
THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY A SINGLE FAMILY HOME AND THE PROPOSED USE OF THE PROPERTY IS THE SAME.
THE PROPERTY IS ON ALL SIDES ARE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS AS WELL.
THIS IS A SITE PHOTO OF THE PROPERTY FROM CUTHBERT AVENUE LOOKING SOUTH.
THE LAND IS DESIGNATED AS URL URBAN RESIDENTIAL LOW, WHICH SUPPORTS RESTRICTIVE LAND USE EMPHASIZING SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED DEVELOPMENT.
THE REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.
IN ADDITION TO THE REPL, THE PROPERTY OWNER HAS SUBMITTED A SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUEST ALLOWING FOR A REDUCED LOT WIDTH.
UM, ONE OBJECTION WAS RECEIVED TODAY, WHICH BRIT JUST HANDED TO YOU.
UM, THE, UM, PROPERTY OWNER WHEN ASKED IF THEY HAD CONCERNS OR OBJECTIONS TO THE, UH, PROPERTY BEING REPLANTED, THEY SAID NO.
UM, SO I DON'T KNOW IF THEY UNDERSTOOD THAT THE LETTER MAYBE WAS JUST A FORMALITY OR, OR WHAT, BUT UM, THEY DIDN'T PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL DETAILS, BUT WE DID STILL WANT TO SHARE THAT WITH YOU AND, UM, BUT STAFF STILL RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND I'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
ANY QUESTIONS FOR OUR STAFF? ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU LORI.
OPENING UP THE PUBLIC HEARING.
IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT THE FIRST STAFF? THANK YOU.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS REQUEST? SEEING NONE.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO IS OPPOSED OR WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION? SEEING NONE.
I WILL CLOSE OUR PUBLIC HEARING AND I'LL GO TO THE COMMISSION FOR ANY MOTIONS.
I HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL BY COMMISSIONER BARRY AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER GARZA.
[8. - Hold a public hearing and consider a Preliminary Plat of Westcliff Addition, Section 6, being a replat of Lot 7A, Block 6, Westcliff Addition, Section 3, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Woodcrest Drive and Princeton Avenue.) (DISTRICT: 3) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]
HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF WESTCLIFF EDITION SECTION SIX BEING A RE OF LOT SEVEN A BLOCK SIX WESTCLIFF EDITION SECTION THREE, CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS, GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF WOODCREST DRIVE AND PRINCETON AVENUE.GOOD AFTERNOON CHAIRMAN AND MADELINE HAW, PLANNER TO PRESENT.
ITEM EIGHT ON THE AGENDA IS A PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBMITTED BY DURING HENNING FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1401 WOODCREST DRIVE TO SUBDIVIDE INTO FOUR LO LOTS FOR FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO PLAT
[00:15:01]
POINT 68 ACRES INTO FOUR LOTS AND THE CURRENT ZONING IS TWO F TWO FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT.THESE SURROUNDING ZONING TO THE NORTH, SOUTH AND WEST IS TWO FD AND TO THE EAST IS SF ONE.
THE CURRENT USE IS A RELIGIOUS USE AND THE SURROUNDING USES TO THE NORTH IS A RELIGIOUS USE TO THE SOUTH AND EAST IS SINGLE.
FAMILY HOMES TO THE WEST ARE VACANT LOTS AND THE PROPOSED USE IS SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING.
HERE'S A SIDE PHOTO ON WOODCREST LOOKING WEST, THE TALL CITY TOMORROW.
LAND USE DESIGNATION IS URBAN MEDIUM, WHICH SUPPORTS A MIX OF COMPLEMENTARY HOUSES, HOUSES INCLUDING SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING.
THIS REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE TALL CITY TOMORROW.
PLAN, A SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUEST FOR THIS PROPERTY IS SCHEDULED FOR THE FEBRUARY 10TH, 2026.
ONE OBJECTION HAS BEEN RECEIVED AS OF FRIDAY, UH, DUE TO TRAFFIC AND SAFETY AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBJECT TO THE CONDITION BELOW.
THANK YOU AND I'M OPEN FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
WHAT, UH, THE SPECIAL EXEMP EXEMPTION REQUEST, WHAT IS THAT FOR? WHAT ARE THEY BEING? IT'S TWO FOR TWO OF THE FOUR LOTS, UH, FOR A REDUCED DEPTH AND WIDTH IN TWO OF THE FOUR LOTS THAT THEY HAVE.
SO THEY, THEY WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO GET ALL FOUR TO FIT THE SIZE NECESSARY FOR TWO F? YES.
HOW, HOW FAR, WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHAT THEY NEED IN WHAT THEY'RE GONNA HAVE? THE BIGGEST DIFFERENCE IS FROM 90 FEET TO A HUNDRED FEET.
UM, THIS IS DUE TO THE, WHENEVER YOU HAVE A DUPLEX, UM, THIS SIZE IS FOR THE WHOLE SIZE, SO USUALLY ON DUPLEXES, THE LOT LINE RUNS THROUGH THE MIDDLE, WHICH WOULD BE LIKE 35 INSTEAD OF 70.
UM, BUT WHEN IT GOES TO SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING ON A DUPLEX, THEY DO HAVE TO HAVE THE 70 OKAY.
AND IT, IT SAID THAT THE CURRENT USE OF THIS PROPERTY IS RELIGIOUS USE? YES, THERE'S CURRENTLY A CHURCH AND THERE IS A CHURCH NEXT TO THE CHURCH.
BUT THEY'RE, I GUESS THEY'RE NOT GONNA BE IN CONTINUING WITH THAT? NO.
IF THEY'RE GONNA BE GOING RESIDENTIAL, YES.
IS THIS, IS THIS IN ORDER TO, ARE THEY GOING TO BE DEVELOPING THIS THEMSELVES OR ARE THEY, ARE THEY TRYING TO GET THIS REPL SO THAT THEY CAN SELL THE LOT? UM, I'M PRETTY SURE IT'S BECAUSE THEY WANNA SELL THOSE, UH, SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, NOT FOR THEMSELVES TO SELL.
SO THEY'RE GONNA RESOUND THE PROPERTY.
UH, THE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ARE ALLOWED IN TWO F, THEY JUST HAVE TO FOLLOW THOSE DIMENSIONS.
UH, BUT LIKE I SAID, IT'S A LITTLE DIFFERENT BECAUSE FOR THE TWO F UM, THOSE DIMENSIONS WOULD PRETTY MUCH BE FOR TWO DUPLEXES, ONE BUILDING.
SO FOR THE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, THEY HAVE TO HAVE ONE SINGLE LOT BE FOR ONE OF THE, THE HOUSES.
AND, AND YOU SAID THERE WAS ONLY ONE OBJECTION LETTER.
IS THAT THE ONE THAT WE RECEIVED TODAY? UH, THE, UH, THE ONE WE RECEIVED ON FRIDAY, UM, I DON'T THINK WAS MAILED TO ME.
I CAN PASS IT AROUND IF YOU OKAY, THAT WOULD BE GREAT.
WHILE YOU'RE TAKING A LOOK AT THAT, I JUST WANT TO UM, REMIND YOU TOO THAT THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE APPLICANT IS HERE IF YOU HAVE MORE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE INTENT OF THE PROJECT.
ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR, FOR STAFF AT THIS TIME? ALL THANK YOU MADAM.
OPENING UP OUR PUBLIC HEARING.
IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? YES.
WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK ON THE MATTER? I DON'T HAVE ANY.
I JUST CAME IN CASE THERE WERE QUESTIONS.
I, IT SOUNDS LIKE THERE ARE SOME QUESTIONS.
SO IF YOU DON'T, IF YOU DON'T MIND, YES, NO PROBLEM.
WOULD YOU MIND GIVING US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE? I'M DUREN TON, UH, LIKE WORK ADDRESS OR
SO, UH, I GUESS ONE OF THE QUESTIONS I THINK I, I SAW YOUR, YOUR HEAD, UM, SHAKING WHEN IT, UH, ARE YOU LOOKING TO SELL THIS YOUR YOURSELF? ARE YOU, ARE YOU TRYING TO BUILD AND AS FAR AS MY CLIENT, I DON'T, I'M THE SURVEYOR ON RECORD.
SO WHAT HE HAD EXPLAINED TO ME WAS HE IS GOING TO BUILD ONSITE BUILDINGS THERE THAT ARE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.
I DON'T KNOW IF HIS INTENT WAS TO LIKE SELL THEM INDIVIDUALLY
[00:20:01]
OR IF HE HAD PEOPLE HE WAS GOING TO RENT THEM TO THAT.BUT I DO KNOW THAT HE WAS GOING TO BUILD THEM ON SITE.
THE, THE CURRENT BUILDING THAT IS ON THAT PROPERTY, WOULD IT BE DEMOLISHED OR WOULD IT BE JUST REPURPOSED? NO, IT'S GONNA REMAIN, IT'S GONNA, UM, AND AS FAR AS I UNDERSTAND, IT'S MORE OF A MOBILE HOME SIZE.
I DON'T, IT'S NOT, I THINK IT BELONGED TO THE CHURCH AT ONE TIME, BUT IT'S NOT, IT'S A HOUSING.
SO IT'S NOT THE, THE CHURCH ITSELF, IT'S THE HOUSING, RIGHT? THAT THE CHURCH OWNED? YEAH, IT LOOKS LIKE.
YEAH, I DON'T THINK YOU CAN SEE IT, BUT BECAUSE THE VEHICLES ARE IN PART OF IT, BUT IT'S, IT'S A SMALL MM-HMM
AND THESE WOULD BE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES? YES.
BUT, BUT THERE'S NO INTENTION OF CHANGING THE ZONING TO SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS? NO, BECAUSE THEY SAID, UM, THAT THE SF TWO WOULD ALLOW A SINGLE FAMILY.
BUT THEN THE CHART THAT WAS SENT TO US, UM, WHEN MADELINE SENT ME THAT, THAT HAD THE SIZE REQUIREMENTS, IT SAID 7,000 SQUI, 7,000 SQUARE FEET AND OR THE DIMENSIONS.
AND SO WE HAD THEM ALL AT 7,000, BUT THEY DIDN'T MEET THE DIMENSIONS.
AND LIKE SHE SAID, THE LARGEST DIFFERENCE IS THE 10 FOOT.
CAN YOU PUT THE PICTURE OF WHAT THE LOT LOOKS LIKE NOW? YEAH, SO DOWN THERE ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER WHERE THE CUTOFF IS, IT HAD BEEN RE PLATTED AT ONE TIME TO MAKE TWO LOTS INTO THIS ONE LOT.
AND THERE IS A DIMENSION THAT GOES, IF THOSE LINES CAME TOGETHER AT A POINT DOWN THERE SO THAT IF YOU INCLUDE THAT 10 FOOT, WHICH AT ONE TIME I KNOW IT WAS DISCUSSED WHEN WE WERE TALKING ABOUT IT, THAT IT MAY BE ABLE TO USE THAT 10 FOOT AS THE OFFICIAL DIMENSION.
UM, BUT THEN THE, THAT CUTOFF MAKES IT THE 90 THAT SHE WAS SAYING.
AND THEN WHEN WE HAVE THEM DIVIDED IN THE CENTER UP AT THE TOP SO THAT WE'RE NOT FIVE FOOT CLOSER THAN FIVE FOOT TWO, THAT EXISTING HOUSE, IT CUTS IT OFF BY ABOUT 3.4 FEET TO BEING WHAT SIZE IT SHOULD BE TRUE.
SO IF YOU'RE PUTTING FOUR SINGLE FAMILY HOMES THERE, RIGHT? MM-HMM
INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR ME IS BIG.
THERE'S ONLY TWO STREETS, RIGHT? THERE'S GOING TO, ON THE PLAT THERE IS A ACCESS EASEMENT THROUGH THE CENTER TO ALLOW ACCESS TO THE BACK LOTS.
AND THAT, IT LOOKS LIKE THAT WOULD BE OFF OF, IS THAT WEST PRINCETON? PRINCETON, YES SIR.
UH, FOR, UH, STAFF, SINCE OUR LETTER, UH, HAS CONCERNS ABOUT THE INFRASTRUCTURE THAT'S IN PLACE, UM, AS WELL AS UH, STREET WIDTHS AND TRAFFIC FLOW, EMERGENCY ACCESS LIMITATIONS, HAVE, HAVE ALL OF THOSE BEEN PROPERLY ADDRESSED FROM, FROM THE CITY? UH, THEY HAVEN'T SEEN ANY ISSUES WITH WHAT, WHAT THEY'LL BE GETTING.
SO, UM, PER THE ENGINEERING STAFF, THEY HAVE MET THE REQUIREMENTS, UM, SPECIFICALLY REGARDING WATER.
THERE'S THE, UM, WATER EXISTS ON WOODCREST STREET, UM, AND THEN ON SEWER YOU HAVE THE SIX INCH SEWER EXISTS ON WOODCREST STREET.
UM, NO CONCERNS WERE BROUGHT UP FROM TRANSPORTATION REGARDING THE TRAFFIC, UM, INTENSITY OR INGRESS EGRESS.
SO, UM, WE CAN ONLY ASSUME THAT THEY, UM, THEY WERE OKAY WITH, WITH WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED.
ON, ON LOT NINE AND LOT 11, I'M NOT SEEING A UTILITY EASEMENT FOR THAT SEWER LINE TO CROSS OVER.
SO THOSE TWO LOTS, YOUR MAIN SEWER LINE IS OFF OF UH, WHATEVER ROAD THAT IS ON THE, ON THE EAST END OF IT.
HOW ARE THEY GONNA PULL SEWER THROUGH THE PROPERTY TO THOSE SINGLE FAMILIES? UH, I KNOW I SAW IN ONE OF THE NOTES MAYBE FROM HIS PRE UM, DEVELOPMENT MEETING THAT THE SEWER WOULD BE EXTENDED DOWN THE ALLEY AND THAT HE WOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT.
SO THEY'RE GONNA BRING IT ALL THE WAY AROUND THE BACK END AND THEN ALL THE WAY BACK.
NOW THAT WAS NOT A THING THAT HE AND I DISCUSSED.
UM, YEAH, THIS, THE NOTES FROM ENGINEERING AT HIS PRE-DEVELOPMENT MEETING SAID, UM, EXTEND SEWER TO ALI TO PROVIDE SERVICE ACCESS.
THAT'S ALL I KNOW SEEMS LIKE A PRETTY, HE DID SAY HE'S OUT OF TOWN.
HE DID SAY HE'D BE REACHABLE BY PHONE IF I NEED TO CALL HIM.
YEAH, IT SEEMS LIKE A PRETTY LONG RUN FOR A SEWER LINE.
SO ONCE AGAIN, UM, JUST TO REASSURE YOU, SO ENGINEERING DIDN'T MENTION ANY CONCERNS REGARDING, UM, THE UTILITIES, SO, UM, I CAN ONLY ASSUME THAT THEY'VE MET THE REQUIREMENTS REGARDING THOSE UTILITIES.
[00:25:01]
OKAY.I THINK ALSO THE LETTER THAT WAS PROVIDED TO US MENTIONED ABOUT THERE'S A PORTION OF THE RIGHT OF WAY THAT IT HAS HISTORICALLY, HISTORICALLY BEEN DESIGNATED AS A, AS A COMMERCIAL AREA.
YOU FAMILIAR WITH THIS? MM-HMM.
SO THIS HAS BEEN A CHURCH, UM, AND CHURCHES ARE ALLOWED IN ANY ZONING.
IT HASN'T BEEN A COMMERCIAL ZONING MM-HMM
BUT PART OF THAT, THAT, UM, AREA IS DEDICATED FOR A RIGHTAWAY CROSSING, THERE IS AN EASEMENT, UM, BUT THERE ARE NOT CONCERNS WITH THE EASEMENT.
FROM, DO WE HAVE HERE THE ZONING MAP? YOU CAN SEE THAT THE PROPERTY IS COMPLETELY SURROUNDED BY RESIDENTIAL ZONING.
SO YOU HAVE SF ONE TO THE EAST, A MULTIFAMILY ZONING TO THE NORTH, AND THEN THE REST IS UH, TWO F, WHICH IS YOUR DUPLEX ZONING, WHICH ALSO ALLOWS FOR SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS.
SO WHETHER THERE'S BEEN COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY THERE OR NOT, I, IT LOOKS LIKE IT WAS ALWAYS ZONED TO BE FOR A RESIDENTIAL MM-HMM
SO IT IS THE FIRST DEVELOPMENT IN THAT AREA THAT WILL BE, UH, HAVE A SPECIAL, UM, UM, EXEMPTION EXCEPTION ON THE LOT WITH, UH, WE'RE NOT AWARE OF ANY EXISTING, UH, SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS IN THE AREA.
MOST OF THE LOTS DO MEET THE DIMENSIONS OF THE DUPLEX ZONING.
UM, MAYBE SAVE SOME ODDLY SHAPED LOTS.
UM, BUT NO, WE'RE, WE'RE NOT AWARE OF ANY, UM, EXISTING SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS.
YEAH, THOSE DO LOOK LIKE JUST COLLECTION OF ODD SHAPES ON THERE,
ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR OUR APPLICANT HERE? ALRIGHT, THANK YOU YOUR TIME.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS REQUEST? SEEING NONE.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO IS OPPOSED OR WOULD LIKE MOWER INFORMATION? ALL RIGHT, I WILL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE OUR PUBLIC HEARING AND GO TO THE COMMISSION FOR ANY MOTIONS COMMENT FOR FRUGAL SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS THE STAFF INDICATES ON THERE THEIR, ON THEIR UH, RECOMMENDATION.
ALRIGHT, I DO HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL BY COMMISSIONER MARTIN.
I SECOND THERE IS A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER BARRY.
IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS MATTER? ALL RIGHT, IF NOT THEN LET'S GO AHEAD AND VOTE.
THREE TO THREE TO ONE ABSTAIN.
[9. - Hold a public hearing and consider a request by Dunaway Associates, on behalf of Black Family Partnerships, for a Zone Change from AE, Agricultural Estate District to PD, Planned Development District for a Housing Development on Lots 10 and 11, Block 2, Solomon Estates, Section 2, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located at the southeast corner of the intersection of North A Street and Mockingbird Lane.) (DISTRICT: 1) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]
IS ITEM NUMBER NINE.HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST BY DUNAWAY ASSOCIATES ON BEHALF OF BLACK FAMILY PARTNERSHIPS FOR A ZONE CHANGE FROM AE AGRICULTURAL ESTATE DISTRICT TO PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR A HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ON LOTS 10 AND 11 BLOCK TWO SOLOMON ESTATES, SECTION TWO, CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS, GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF NORTH A STREET IN MOCKINGBIRD LANE.
GOOD AFTERNOON, CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS MADE PLANNER TO PRESENT.
ITEM NINE ON THE AGENDA IS THE ZONE CHANGE REQUEST SUBMITTED BY MELANIE MARTINEZ WITH DUNAWAY ASSOCIATES FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 54 0 7 AND 53 15 L SHIVA LANE TO CREATE A PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION.
THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED AE, THE SURROUNDING ZONING INCLUDES PD FOR A RECREATION CENTER TO THE NORTH PD FOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT TO THE WEST SF ONE TO THE SOUTH AND CCE TO THE EAST.
THE PROPOSED ZONING IS PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR A HOUSING DEVELOPMENT.
THE CURRENT USE IS SINGLE FAMILY USE SURROUNDING USES INCLUDE A PRIVATE RECREATION CLUB TO THE NORTH AND SINGLE FAMILY TO THE SOUTHEAST AND WEST.
THE PROPOSED USE IS SINGLE FAMILY.
HERE'S A SIDE PHOTO ON SHIVA LANE LOOKING WEST, THE TALL CITY TOMORROW.
LAND USE DESIGNATION IS URBAN RESIDENTIAL LARGE LOT, WHICH SUPPORTS NEIGHBORHOODS WITH LARGE,
[00:30:01]
LARGER LOTS EMPHASIZING SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.THE REQUEST IS PARTIALLY, PARTIALLY COMPATIBLE WITH THE TALL CITY TOMORROW.
PLAN HERE IS A COMPARISON CHART OF THE LOT SIZES.
THE PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR THIS PROPERTY WAS APPROVED AT THE DECEMBER 15TH, 2025 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.
NO OBJECTIONS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED.
SHOULD THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVE THIS STONE CHANGE STAFF RECOMMENDS THE FOLLOWING CONDITION.
AND I'M OPEN FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
YOU MENTIONED THAT THIS IS PARTIALLY COMPATIBLE WITH THE TALL CITY, UH, TOMORROW PLAN.
HOW, WHAT DO YOU MEAN? PARTIALLY WHAT, WHAT PARTS ARE CONFORMING AND WHICH ONES ARE NOT? SO WE SAY PARTIALLY BECAUSE HALF OF THE DEVELOPMENT IS MADE UP OF YOUR, UH, YOUR SMALLER LOTS, UM, COMPARABLE TO THE SF THREE AS WELL AS UH, SOME SF TWO.
UM, THIS AREA THAT COMP LAND CALLS FOR, UM, LARGER LOTS WHICH ARE MORE, UM, MORE SO REFERRING TO YOUR ONE ACRE OR TWO ACRE, WHICH IS WHAT THE OTHER HALF IS REFERRING TO.
AND SO, UM, US JUST SAYING PARTIALLY IS JUST TO, JUST TO ENSURE YOU UNDERSTAND UM, THAT DISTINCTION BETWEEN THOSE DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT.
UM, WE STILL ULTIMATELY RECOMMEND APPROVAL BECAUSE THE DENSITY OVERALL IS STILL, UH, COMPATIBLE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CALLS FOR, UM, IN ADDITION TO THAT, UH, THE NEARBY RESIDENCES ALSO TO THE, TO THE WEST AND TO THE UM, THE SOUTH.
UM, ALSO HAVE COMPARABLE LOT SIZES.
UM, BUT THAT, THAT'S IN SUMMARY, THAT'S WHY.
ARE THERE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? THANK YOU MADAM.
OPENING UP THE PUBLIC HEARING.
IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? WOULD YOU LIKE TO COME SPEAK OR DEFER TO STAFF? UM, I'M AVAILABLE IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS REQUEST? SEEING NONE.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO IS OPPOSED OR WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION? OKAY, SEEING NONE I WILL CLOSE OUR PUBLIC HEARING AND GO TO THE COMMISSION.
ALL RIGHT, I'LL TAKE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL BY COMMISSIONER GARZA AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER BARRY.
IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? LET'S VOTE.
ALL RIGHT, THAT CONCLUDES OUR PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR TODAY.
[10. - Motion approving, with staff's recommended conditions, a Preliminary Plat of County Road 140 Park Addition, being a 4.42-acre tract of land out of Section 22, Block 39, T2-S, T&P RR Co. Survey, Midland County, Texas. (Generally located at the northwest corner of intersection of West County Road 140 and State Highway 349.) (EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]
TO OUR MISCELLANEOUS SECTION.ITEM NUMBER 10, MOTION APPROVING WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS.
A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF COUNTY ROAD 140 PARK EDITION BEING A 4.42 ACRE TRACKED OF LAND OUT OF SECTION 22 BLOCK 39 T TWO STP RAILROAD COMMISSION SURVEY MIDLAND COUNTY, TEXAS GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF INTERSECTION OF WEST COUNTY ROAD ONE 40 AND STATE HIGHWAY 3 49.
THANK YOU CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS ANGELINA TINI TO PRESENT.
ITEM 10 ON THE AGENDA IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR COUNTY ROAD ONE 40 PARK EDITION SUBMITTED BY MAVERICK ENGINEERING FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1 0 0 8 WEST COUNTY ROAD ONE 40 IN THE ETJ AND THEY ARE PLATTING FOR FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
THE PLAT DETAILS, IT IS 4.42 ACRES AND THEY ARE PROPOSING TO PLAT INTO TWO LOTS.
THE SURROUNDING USES TO THE NORTH IS VACANT LAND AND COMMERCIAL USE TO THE EAST, SOUTH, AND WEST IS SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING.
UH, CURRENT USE SHOWS SOME VACANT LAND, UM, WITH A PROPOSED USE OF SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING.
THIS AREA IS NOT DESIGNATED BY OUR TALL CITY TOMORROW.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS IT IS IN THE ETJ AND STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS.
THANK YOU AND I'M OPEN FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? GREAT, THANK YOU ANGELINA.
ALRIGHT, DO I HEAR ANY MOTIONS? SECOND, I HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL BY COMMISSIONER BARRY AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER CIGA.
[00:35:02]
GREAT, LET'S VOTE.[11. - Motion approving, with staff's recommended conditions, a Preliminary Plat of Antelope Ridge, being a 225.28-acre tract of land out of Sections 13, 14, 23, and 24, Block 40, T-2-S, T&P RR Co. Survey, Midland County, Texas. (Generally located on the west side of West Couty Road 130, approximately 1,120 feet north of West County Road 135.) (EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]
MOTION APPROVING WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS.A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF ANTELOPE RIDGE BEING A 225.28 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF SECTIONS 13 14 23 AND 24 BLOCK 40 T TWO STP RAILROAD COMMISSION SURVEY MIDLAND COUNTY OF TEXAS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF WEST COUNTY ROAD 130 APPROXIMATELY 1,120 FEET NORTH OF WEST COUNTY ROAD 1 35.
THANK YOU CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS ANGELINA BENINI TO PRESENT.
ITEM NUMBER 11 IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ANTELOPE BRIDGE SUBMITTED BY LICH AND MARTLAND, SARA AND CO FOR A PROPERTY THAT IS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF WEST COUNTY ROAD ONE 30 AND THEY ARE WANTING TO PLAT FOR FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
THIS PLAT IS 225 POINTS 28 ACRES AND THEY ARE WANTING TO PRO, THEY'RE PROPOSING 65.
SURROUNDING USES TO THE NORTH IS COMMERCIAL AND VACANT LAND WITH THE EAST, UH, COMMERCIAL THE SOUTH YOU HAVE A SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING SUBDIVISION AND TO THE WEST IS VACANT.
THIS IS NOT AN AREA THAT HAS A DESIGNATION IN OUR TULSA CITY TOMORROW.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS IT IS LOCATED IN THE ETJ.
UM, SINCE THIS PLAT IS OVER 25 ACRES, IT WILL HAVE TO HAVE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL AND IT IS CURRENTLY SCHEDULED FOR THE FEBRUARY 24TH, 2026 CITY COUNCIL MEETING.
UM, STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST, UM, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS.
ALL RIGHT, IS THERE ANYTHING TO, ANY QUESTIONS FOR OUR STAFF? THANK YOU.
ALRIGHT, DO I HEAR ANY MOTIONS? I, I'LL SECOND.
I HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL BY COMMISSIONER OFIELD AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER, UH, RICHARDSON.
IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL RIGHT, LET'S VOTE.
MOTION PASSED SEVEN TO ZERO ADAM.
[12. - Motion approving, with staff's recommended conditions, a Preliminary Plat of Horseshoe Bend, being a replat of a 64.12-acre portion of Lot 1, Block 1, Staley Addition, and a 125.01-acre tract of land out of Section 10, Block X, H.P. Hilliard Survey, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located on the east side of North Garfield Street, approximately 1,295 feet north of Mockingbird Lane.) (DISTRICT: 1) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]
MOTION APPROVING WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS.A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF HORSESHOE BEND BEING A REPL OF A 64.12 ACRE PORTION OF LOT ONE BLOCK, ONE STALEY EDITION AND A 125.01 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF SECTION 10 BLOCK X HP HILLIARD.
SURVEY CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH GARFIELD STREET, APPROXIMATELY 101,295 FEET NORTH OF MOCKINGBIRD LANE.
GOOD AFTERNOON, CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS.
BRITT MARY, SENIOR PLANNER TO PRESENT ITEM, EXCUSE ME, NUMBER 12, ITEM 12 ON THE AGENDA AS A PRELIMINARY PLAT SENT BY NEWTON ENGINEERING ON BEHALF OF MARK PAYNE FOR FUTURE RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH GARFIELD STREET, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO PLOT 187.6 ACRES AND A 385 LOTS.
PROPERTIES CURRENTLY HAS MULTIPLE ZONINGS SUCH AS SF ONE AE AND A PD FOR A SHOPPING CENTER.
SURROUNDINGS ZONING TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH IS AE SURROUNDINGS ZONING TO THE EAST SF ONE AND SF TWO AND SURROUNDINGS ZONE TO THE WEST INCLUDES AE SF ONE, SF THREE AND A PD FOR A HOUSING DEVELOPMENT.
THE CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY IS VACANT LAND SURROUNDING LAND USE TO THE NORTH AND WEST IS ALSO VACANT LAND AND TO THE SOUTH AND EAST OF SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING.
THE PROPOSED USES FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING AND COMMERCIAL USE.
HERE'S A SITE PHOTO OF THE PROPERTY.
THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATES THIS LOCATION AS URBAN RESIDENTIAL.
LOW SUPPORTING USES INCLUDE A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL.
THIS REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE TO TALL CITY TOMORROW.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN ADDITION TO THE PLAT, THE PROPERTY IS ALSO BEING REZONED.
UM, ALSO THIS WILL GO TO CITY COUNCIL.
IT'S SCHEDULED FOR UH, FEBRUARY 24.
UH, FOURTH MEETING STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS.
OPEN FOR QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE 'EM.
IT LOOKS LIKE MOCKINGBIRD LANE IS, LOOKS LIKE THAT WOULD BE PART OF THIS ADDITION.
SO WOULD THAT, THEY'LL HAVE TO GO AHEAD.
I WAS GONNA ASK IF THAT WOULD GO AHEAD AND COMPLETE FROM WHAT IS THAT GARFIELD TO A STREET? YES SIR.
THEY'LL HAVE TO EXTEND IT OUT.
AND THAT'S ON THEM TO DO IT? YES SIR.
THAT'S ONE OF ENGINEERING'S COMMENTS FOR THIS, THIS CASE.
OKAY, ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU.
[00:40:02]
I MOVE FOR APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE RESTRICTIONS IN CASE.ALRIGHT, I HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL BY COMMISSIONER MARTIN AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON.
IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? GREAT.
[13. - Motion approving, with staff’s recommended conditions, a Preliminary Plat of Crossroads Addition, Section 3, being a 19.13-acre tract of land out of Section 32, Block 40, T-1-S, T&P RR Co. Survey, Midland County, Texas. (Generally located on the north side of West County Road 72, approximately 500 feet east of North County Road 1280.) (EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]
13, MOTION APPROVING WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS.A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF CROSS ROADS EDITION SECTION THREE BEING A 19.13 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF SECTION 32 BLOCK 40 T ONE STNP RAILROAD COMMISSION SURVEY.
MIDLAND COUNTY, TEXAS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WEST COUNTY ROAD 72 APPROXIMATELY 500 FEET EAST OF NORTH COUNTY ROAD 1002 80.
GOOD AFTERNOON, CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS.
UM, MADEAM HAWKES PLANNER TO PRESENT.
A PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTED BY ASHLEY DEBAN WITH MAVERICK ENGINEERING FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1 0 1 10 WEST COUNTY ROAD 72 IN THE ETJ FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF INDUSTRIAL LOTS.
UH, THE ACREAGE IS 19 POINT 13 ACRES AND IT'S PROPOSED TO BE SUBDIVIDED INTO FIVE LOTS.
THE CURRENT USE IS VACANT LAND.
THE SURROUNDING USES INCLUDE VACANT LAND TO THE NORTH AND EAST AND INDUSTRIAL USE TO THE SOUTH AND WEST WITH THE PROPOSED USE OF INDUSTRIAL USE.
THE COMPREHENSIVE, UH, PLAN, UM, THE LAND IS NOT DESIGNATED BECAUSE IT'S IN THE ETJ AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION.
AND I'M OPEN FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
UM, SO WHEN THEY DO A GROUNDWATER STUDY, WHAT ALL DOES THAT ENTAIL? SO THE GROUNDWATER WATER STUDIES, UM, GO TO THE ENGINEERING, UH, DEPARTMENT AND THEY LOOK AT THE CITY'S ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT.
SO THEY HAVE TO SUBMIT, UH, AND SHE'S RIGHT ENGINEERING REVIEWS IT, BUT THEY SUBMIT DOCUMENTATION THAT'S REQUIRED BY THE STATE.
UM, THE DOCUMENTATION IS BASICALLY CERTIFIED BY A, UM, OH, WHAT ARE THEY CALLED? GEOLOGIST? YES.
UM, AND THAT IS THEN SUBMITTED TO US.
THAT'S REVIEWED BY ENGINEERING, UM, FOR THEIR REVIEW.
AND SO ESSENTIALLY WHAT THE STATE REQUIRES IS JUST THAT THAT DOCUMENTATION IS COMPLETE WHEN IT'S SUBMITTED.
UM, AND THAT'S REQUIRED AT THE, THE PRELIMINARY PHASE.
ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? THANK YOU MADAM.
ANY MOTIONS? MOTIONS,
OH, AND I'LL TAKE THE SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER CIGA.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THE MATTER? OKAY, LET'S VOTE.
THAT CONCLUDES OUR AGENDA FOR THE DAY.
SO AT FOUR 14 I WILL CLOSE OUR AND ADJOURN OUR MEETING.