Link


Social

Embed


Download

Download
Download Transcript


[00:00:01]

YEP, WHENEVER YOU'RE SIR.

[OPENING ITEMS]

ALL RIGHT, IT'S THREE 30.

I'LL GO AHEAD AND CALL THIS PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION MEETING TO ORDER.

FIRST ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, SO IF YOU'LL PLEASE STAND WITH ME.

I, I PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL HONOR THE TEXAS FLAG.

I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THEE TEXAS, ONE STATE UNDER GOD, ONE AND INDIVISIBLE.

THANK YOU.

AT THIS TIME WE WILL HAVE OUR PUBLIC COMMENT, PERIOD.

WE WILL, DURING THIS TIME WE, WE WILL RECEIVE COMMENTS FROM MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO DESIRE TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGARDING ITEMS ON THE PRESENT AGENDA FOR WHICH PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL NOT BE HELD.

YOU'LL BE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES DURING THIS TIME.

IS THERE ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO COME UP FOR PUBLIC COMMENT? ALL RIGHT, I'M SEEING NONE.

SO WE WILL MOVE TO

[CONSENT AGENDA]

THE CONSENT AGENDA.

IS THERE AN ITEM OR ARE THERE ANY ITEMS THAT ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO TAKE OFF OF OUR CONSENT AGENDA? YES, UM, I BELIEVE THERE'S, THERE'S A FEW ITEMS. SO THERE REQUESTED TO BE YES.

THANK YOU.

JUST TO CLARIFY SO THAT WE HAVE APPLICANTS PULLING ITEMS 5, 6, 7, 17, AND NINE, THEY HAVE ITEMS RELATED TO THEM THAT STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED.

SO THE APPLICANTS ARE DOING THAT TO HAVE MORE TIME.

OKAY, SO JUST FOR MY OWN, I HEARD 5, 6, 7, 9, 9, AND 17.

YES SIR.

OKAY.

AND THOSE ARE BEING COMPLETELY PULLED FROM THE AGENDA? CORRECT.

GREAT, AND I WOULD LIKE TO PULL ITEM NUMBER THREE TO BOTH SEPARATELY.

OKAY.

PLEASE.

ITEM NUMBER THREE, WE WILL PULL FOR SEPARATE CONSIDERATION.

THAT LEAVES ITEMS NUMBER TWO AND FOUR FOR CONSENT AGENDA.

ANYTHING ELSE ON THOSE? GREAT.

DO I HEAR ANY MOTIONS? I'LL MOVE.

I MAKE A MOTION.

OH, GO AHEAD.

ALRIGHT, I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA, WHICH IS JUST ITEMS TWO AND FOUR AT THIS TIME.

UH, FROM COMMISSIONER CIGA SECONDED AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER OFIELD.

IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THESE ITEMS? ALL RIGHT, LET'S VOTE.

SORRY IF YOU, IF YOU'RE NOT SEEING THE VOTE, GO TO A GO TO YOUR AGENDAS UP IN THE TOP.

OKAY.

JOIN MEETING PRESENT VOTING AND SAVE.

NOW YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO VOTE WHEN WE SEEING COMMISSIONER GARZA AND CIGA ON HERE.

MM-HMM .

I'M SORRY GARZA AND CIGA THAT YOU STILL NEED THEM TO TO VOTE? YEAH.

OKAY.

CAN YOU GO TO GO UP TO THE E VOTE? GO TO E VOTE UP AT THE TOP LEFT.

THERE YOU GO.

GOT IT.

THANKS.

MOTION PASSED.

SIX TO ZERO.

THANK YOU.

ITEM NUMBER THREE,

[3. - Motion approving a Final Plat of Llano Estacado, Section 4, being a plat of a 1.0- acre tract of land out of Section 23, Block 40, T-1-S, T&P RR Co. Survey, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located on the north side of Gladiola Avenue, approximately 465 feet east of Golden Gate Drive.) (DISTRICT: 4) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

A MOTION APPROVING A FINAL PLAT OF YANO ESTACADO SECTION FOUR BEING A PLA OF A 1.0 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF SECTION 23 BLOCK 40 T ONE STNP RAILROAD COMMISSION SURVEY CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF GLADIOLA AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 465 FEET EAST OF GOLDEN GATE DRIVE.

THANK YOU CHAIRMAN.

COMMISSIONERS RIZZA PLANNING TO PRESENT ITEM NUMBER THREE.

ITEM THREE AND AGENDA IS THE FINAL PLA SUBMITTED BY MAVERICK ENGINEERING FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6,500 OLA AVENUE.

THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO PLAT ONE ACRE INTO TWO LOTS.

THE CURRENT SONY OF THE PROPERTY IS CE COUNTRY ESTATES AND THE SURROUNDING SONY TO THE NORTH IS SF ONE AND TO THE SO AND EAST AND WEST WE HAVE CO COUNTRY ESTATES DISTRICT.

THE CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY IS A SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE SURROUNDING LAND USED TO THE NORTH IS VACANT TO THE SOUTHEAST AND WEST SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING.

THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATES DISLOCATION AS URBAN RESIDENTIAL LARGE LOCK SUPPORTING USERS INCLUDE SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING.

THE REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE

[00:05:01]

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

A SPECIAL EXCEPTION WAS APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL BACK IN NOVEMBER 18TH, 2025 TO ALLOW THEM TO PLOT INTO TWO LOTS.

SINCE IT IS SUPPOSED TO BE MORE THAN ONE ACRE, WELL AN ACRE AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST.

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? NO.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

ALL RIGHT.

DO I HEAR ANY MOTIONS? I MOVE TO APPROVE.

I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE FROM COMMISSIONER OFIELD.

SECOND.

SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER MARTIN.

IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THE ITEM? ALRIGHT, LET'S VOTE.

GEEZ.

OH I NEED TO SAVE.

MOTION PASSED.

FIVE TO ZERO TO ONE.

ALRIGHT, THAT IS GOING TO LEAD US BECAUSE WE HAVE FINISHED ALL OF OUR CONSENT AGENDA THAT WILL LEAD US TO OUR PUBLIC HEARINGS.

OUR PROCEDURE FOR CONDUCTING PUBLIC HEARINGS IS AS FOLLOWS.

ONE.

THE STAFF WILL PRESENT ITS EVALUATION OF THE REQUEST.

NEXT, THE APPLICANT WILL PRESENT THE REQUEST AND RESPOND TO ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.

NEXT, THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE REQUEST WILL ADDRESS THE COMMISSION.

THEN THOSE WHO ARE OPPOSED TO THE REQUEST OR WHO WISH ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL ADDRESS THE COMMISSION.

THE APPLICANT WILL THEN HAVE A FINAL OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS ANY OF THE REMARKS FROM THE PUBLIC.

THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL THEN BE CLOSED.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC WILL BE HEARD ONLY IF A MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION DESIRES TO DIRECT A QUESTION EITHER TO THE APPLICANT OR A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC.

FINALLY, THE COMMISSION WILL CONSIDER ALL OF THE INFORMATION PRESENTED AND VOTE ON THE MATTER.

TODAY'S FIRST PUBLIC

[8. - Hold a public hearing and consider a request by Chase Gardaphe for a Zone Change from PD, Planned Development District for a Housing Development to МН, Manufactured Housing District on a 35.05-acre tract of land out of Section 25, Block 39, T-1-S, T&P RR Co. Survey, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located on the west side of North Fairgrounds Road, approximately 650 feet north of East Cuthbert Avenue.) (DISTRICT: 2) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

HEARING IS ITEM NUMBER EIGHT.

HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST BY CHASE GAR DEFE FOR A ZONE CHANGE FROM PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR A HOUSING DEVELOPMENT TO MH MANUFACTURED HOUSING DISTRICT ON A 35.05 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF SECTION 25 BLOCK 39 T ONE ST AND P RAILROAD COMMISSION SURVEY CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF NORTH FAIRGROUNDS ROAD APPROXIMATELY 650 FEET NORTH OF EAST CUTHBERT AVENUE.

THANK YOU CHAIRMAN COMMISSION RIZZA TO PRESENT ITEM NUMBER EIGHT.

THE AGENDA IS SO CHANGE SUBMITTED BY CHASE GAREY FOR A PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF NORTH FAIRGROUNDS APPROXIMATELY 650 FEET NORTHEAST OF CALPER AVENUE IN ORDER TO OPERATE A MANUFACTURE HOME PARK.

THE CURRENT THE PROPERTY AND THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST ARE CURRENTLY ZONE PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR A HOUSING DEVELOPMENT.

THE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH ARE ZONE C COMMERCIAL.

THE PROPERTIES TO THE EAST ARE ZONE AE AGRICULTURE ESTATES AND TP TECHNOLOGY PARK DISTRICT.

THE PROPOSED ZONING IS MH MANUFACTURE HOUSING DISTRICT.

THE CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY ALONG WITH THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST IS VACANT UP NORTH.

WE HAVE A SENIOR LIVING APARTMENTS TO THE EAST.

WE HAVE THE ANIMAL SHELTER AND A MANUFACTURE HOME PARK DOWN SOUTH.

WE HAVE PROPERTIES BEING USED FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES.

HERE IS THE S FOOT ON NORTH FAIRGROUNDS LOOKING WEST.

THE TALL COMPREHENSIVE PLANT, DESTIN IS THIS AREA'S URBAN MEDIUM WHICH SUPPORT USES INCLUDING MIXED HOUSING TYPES ALONG WITH COMMERCIAL OFFICE AND SERVICE USES.

THE REQUEST IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BUT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING USE.

ALSO A SPECIFIC USE DESTINATION APPLICATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED IN ORDER TO MANUFACTURE TO OPERATE THE MANUFACTURE HOME PARK.

NO OBJECTIONS WERE RECEIVED, THEREFORE STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVED THIS REQUEST AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS SHOULD WE HAVE ANYTHING FOR STAFF.

ANY QUESTIONS? ALRIGHT, THANK YOU.

OPENING UP OUR PUBLIC HEARING.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS REQUEST? IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS REQUEST? ALL RIGHT, SEEING NONE, IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO IS OPPOSED OR WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION? SEEING NONE.

I'LL CLOSE OUR PUBLIC HEARING AND WE WILL GO TO THE CA, THE COMMISSION I I FOR APPROVAL.

ALL RIGHT.

I HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL FROM COMMISSIONER OFIELD.

[00:10:01]

OH, I'M SORRY.

I HEARD, I HEARD COMMISSIONER OFIELD.

THAT'S FROM COMMISSIONER MARTIN.

MY APOLOGIES.

THAT'S ALL RIGHT.

SAME DIRECTION.

SORRY.

NEED Y'ALL ON DIFFERENT SIDES OF ME? I KNOW.

YEAH, THAT'S, I'LL SECOND.

I NOW HAVE A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER OFIELD.

IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALRIGHT, WE'LL GO AHEAD AND VOTE.

MOTION PASSED.

FIVE TO ZERO TO ONE.

ALRIGHT, ITEM NUMBER NINE HAS BEEN PULLED FROM OUR AGENDA.

SO ITEM NUMBER 10,

[10. - Hold a public hearing and consider a request by Eduardo Aleman, on behalf of Point 9 Realty, LLC, for a Zone Change from PD, Planned Development District for a Transitional District to RR, Regional Retail District on Lot 2B, Block 3, Corporate Plaza Addition, Section 19, and Lot 3, Block 3, Corporate Plaza Addition, Section 2, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Spring Park Drive and Edwards Street.) (DISTRICT: 2) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST BY EDUARDO ALAMAN ON BEHALF OF 0.9 REALTY LLC FOR A ZONE CHANGE FROM PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR A TRANSITIONAL DISTRICT TO RR REGIONAL RETAIL DISTRICT ON LOT TWO B BLOCK THREE CORPORATE PLAZA EDITION SECTION 19 AND LOT THREE BLOCK THREE CORPORATE PLAZA EDITION SECTION TWO CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS.

GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF SPRING PARK DRIVE AND EDWARD STREET AFTERNOON.

UM, PLANNER LORI ELLIOTT TO PRESENT ITEM 10.

ITEM 10 ON THE AGENDA IS A ZONE CHANGE REQUEST SUBMITTED BY GRAM CONSULTING ON BEHALF OF POINT NINE REALTY FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 2 42 SPRING PARK DRIVE AND 36 0 1 EDWARD STREET IN DISTRICT TWO.

THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONE PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR A TRANSITIONAL DISTRICT AND THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A ZONE CHANGE TO RR REGIONAL RETAIL FOR FUTURE COMMERCIAL USE.

THE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH ARE ZONED PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT FOR A TRANSITIONAL DISTRICT AS WELL.

PROPERTIES TO THE WEST ARE ZONED RR REGIONAL RETAIL AND TO THE EAST IS ZONED PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT.

THE CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY IS AN OFFICE BUILDING ON THE SPRING PARK DRIVE SIDE AND A VACANT BUILDING ON EDWARD STREET.

UM, THE PROPOSED USES ARE OFFICE BUILDINGS AND THEN COMMERCIAL USE.

THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH CONSISTS OF AN OFFICE BUILDING TO THE WEST AND SOUTH ARE RETAIL SHOPS AND RESTAURANTS AND TO THE EAST IS AN APARTMENT COMPLEX.

THIS IS A SITE PHOTO OF THE PROPERTY ON SPRING PARK DRIVE LOOKING SOUTH.

THE TALL CITY TOMORROW PLAN DESIGNATES THIS PROPERTY AS UH, URBAN HIGH, WHICH SUPPORTS A MIX OF COMPLEMENTARY USES TO INCLUDE OFFICES AND REGIONAL COMMERCIAL.

THE REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE TALL CITY TOMORROW PLAN AND THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD.

IN ADDITION TO THE ZONE CHANGE REQUEST, THE PROPERTY IS BEING REPLANTED TO RECONFIGURE THE TWO LOTS.

NO OBJECTIONS WERE RECEIVED AND WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE ZONE CHANGE REQUEST.

THANK YOU AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU LORI.

THANK YOU.

OPENING UP THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? OKAY, IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS REQUEST? I SEEING NONE.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO IS OPPOSED OR WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION? SEEING NONE.

I WILL CLOSE OUR PUBLIC HEARING AND I WILL GO TO THE COMMISSION.

MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE A MOTION TO APPROVE FROM COMMISSIONER CIGA.

I'LL SECOND IN A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER GARZA.

IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? NO SIR.

ALRIGHT, THANK YOU.

LET'S VOTE.

MOTION PASSED SIX TO ZERO.

ITEM NUMBER 11,

[11. - Hold a public hearing and consider a request by Cumulus Design, on behalf of Cumberland and Western Resources, LLC, for an initial zoning of RR, Regional Retail District, in part, and LR, Local Retail District, in part, for a 4.09-acre tract of land out of Section 35, Block 40, T-1-S, T&P RR Co. Survey, Midland County, Texas. (Generally located on the south side of West State Highway 158, approximately 220 feet east of Bear Drive.) (EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST BY CUMULUS DESIGN ON BEHALF OF CUMBERLAND AND WESTERN RESOURCES.

LLC FOR AN INITIAL ZONING OF RR REGIONAL RETAIL DISTRICT IN PART AND LR LOCAL RETAIL DISTRICT IN PART FOR A 4.09 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF SECTION 35 BLOCK 40 T ONE STMP RAILROAD COMMISSION SURVEY MIDLAND COUNTY, TEXAS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WEST STATE HIGHWAY 1 58 APPROXIMATELY 220 FEET EAST OF BEAR DRIVE.

GOOD AFTERNOON COMMISSIONERS.

BRITT MURRAY, SENIOR PLANNER TO PRESENT.

ITEM NUMBER 11.

ITEM NUMBER 11 ON THE AGENDA AS INITIAL ZONING REQUEST.

SO JUST A LITTLE BIT OF BACKGROUND FOR THE NEW COMMISSIONERS BECAUSE THESE ARE UH, OFTEN PRETTY RARE.

UM, SO WHEN PROPERTIES BEING ANNEXED THEY HAVE AN ASSOCIATED UH, INITIAL ZONING THAT GOES WITH IT.

SINCE THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY NOT IN THE CITY LIMITS.

SO THIS IS ESTABLISHING THE FIRST ZONING FOR THIS PROPERTY.

SO THIS REQUEST IS SUBMITTED BY HUMUS DESIGN ON

[00:15:01]

BEHALF OF CUMBERLAND AND WESTERN RESOURCES LLC FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF STATE HIGHWAY 1 58.

THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE INITIAL ZONING FOR FUTURE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT.

SO AGAIN, THE PROPERTY CURRENTLY HAS NO ZONING.

THE PROPERTIES IN NORTH ARE ZONED A PD FOR A HOUSING DEVELOPMENT TO THE EAST IS REGIONAL RETAIL TO THE WEST.

SF THREE TO THE SOUTH IS NO ZONING 'CAUSE IT'S IN THE ETJ.

UM, PROPOSED ZONING WILL BE REGIONAL RETAIL AND LOCAL RETAIL.

SO THE CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY IS VACANT LAND.

THE PROPOSED USE IS FOR COMMERCIAL USE.

THEY'RE ALSO IN THE PROCESS OF PLOTTING IT SO THERE WILL BE THREE LOTS ONCE IT'S DONE.

UM, THE EASTERN MOST LOT WILL BE A BANK AND UH, THE USE FOR THE OTHER TWO LOTS HAVE NOT BEEN DETERMINED AT THIS TIME.

THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH AND WEST CONSISTS OF SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING TO THE SOUTH IS VACANT.

LAND INTO THE EAST IS A GAS STATION.

HERE'S A SITE PHOTO OF THE PROPERTY SO IT'S JUST SOUTH OF COSTCO WHERE THE NEW COSTCO'S AT THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATES THIS LOCATION AS URBAN HIGH.

THIS DESIGNATION SUPPORTS OF A VARIETY OF DIFFERENT NON-RESIDENTIAL USES.

THIS REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE TALL CITY TOMORROW.

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

UH, AS MENTIONED, THE PROPERTY'S ALSO IN THE PROCESS OF BEING UH, PLATTED.

ANNEXED ANNEXATION REQUESTS WILL GO TO MARCH 24.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING.

Y'ALL WON'T SEE THE ANNEX THAT ONLY GOES TO CITY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL.

UM, NO OBJECTIONS ARE RECEIVED AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST.

AND I'M OPEN FOR QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF.

THANK YOU BRETT.

THANK Y'ALL.

OPENING UP THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? WOULD YOU LIKE TO SAY ANYTHING OR JUST DEFER TO STAFF? DEFER TO STAFF.

APPRECIATE THAT.

THANK YOU.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS REQUEST? SEEING NONE.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO IS OPPOSED OR WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION? ALRIGHT, I WILL CLOSE OUR PUBLIC HEARING AND WE WILL GO TO THE COMMISSION.

I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE.

I HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL BY COMMISSIONER OFIELD SECOND, A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER MARTIN.

IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THE ITEM? OKAY, LET'S VOTE.

MOTION PASSED.

SIX TO ZERO.

THANK YOU.

ITEM NUMBER 12,

[12. - Hold a public hearing and consider a request by Mark Payne for a Zone Change from SF-1, Single-Family Dwelling District, in part, PD, Planned Development District for a Shopping Center, in part, and AE, Agricultural Estate District, in part, to SF-3, Single-Family Dwelling District, in part, and LR, Local Retail District, in part, on a 164.49-acre tract of land out of Section 10, Block X, H.P. Hilliard Survey, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located on the east side of North Garfield Street, approximately 1,295 feet north of Mockingbird Lane.) (DISTRICT: 1) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

HOLY PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST BY MARK PAYNE FOR A ZONE CHANGE FROM SF ONE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT IN PART PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR A SHOPPING CENTER IN PART AND AE AGRICULTURAL ESTATE DISTRICT IN PART TO SF THREE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT IN PART AND LR LOCAL RETAIL DISTRICT IN PART ON A 164.49 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF SECTION 10 BLOCK X HP HILLIARD SURVEY CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH GARFIELD STREET APPROXIMATELY 1,295 FEET NORTH OF MOCKINGBIRD LANE.

GOOD AFTERNOON CHAIRMAN COMMISSIONERS BRITT MARY SENIOR PLANNER REPRESENT ITEM NUMBER 12.

ITEM ON THE ITEM 12 ON THE AGENDA OF THE ZONE CHANGE REQUEST SUBMITTED BY MARK PAYNE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH GARFIELD STREET.

THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE ZONE CHANGE FOR FUTURE RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT.

IT MIGHT LOOK FAMILIAR.

I SAW THE PLAT LAST TIME YOU WERE HERE.

YES, SO THERE IS A LOT OF ZONING THAT GOES ON WITH IT.

UM, IT HAS SF ONE CURRENTLY AE AND A PD FOR A SHOPPING CENTER SURROUNDING ZONING TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH IS ALSO AE UH, SURROUNDING ZONING TO THE EAST SF ONE, SF TWO AND SURROUNDING ZONING TO THE WEST INCLUDES AE SF ONE, SF THREE AND A PD FOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT.

THE CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY IS VACANT LAND.

THE SURROUNDING LAND USE OF THE NORTH AND WEST IS VACANT LAND INTO THE SOUTH AND EAST OF SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING.

THE PROPOSED USE IS FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING AS WELL AS COMMERCIAL USE.

HERE'S A SITE VOTE OF THE PROPERTY.

THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATES THIS LOCATION AS URBAN RESIDENTIAL.

LOW SUPPORTING USES INCLUDE A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USES.

THIS REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE TO T CITY TOMORROW.

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

AS OF THIS MORNING, UH, TWO OBJECTIONS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED AND I Y'ALL HAVE THOSE LETTERS IN FRONT OF YOU.

UM, STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST.

IT SEEMS LIKE SOME OF THE OBJECTIONS WERE REGARDING UM, WATER AS WELL AS UM, ACCESS TO AN EASEMENT AND UH, JUST NOT AGREEING WITH THE PROPOSED ZONING.

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER.

DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF AT THIS TIME? YOU SAID WE HAD THIS ITEM IN THE PREVIOUS MEETING, RIGHT? YES MA'AM.

WE BOUGHT IT ON IT.

SO, UM, IT'S COMING BACK FOR, SO YOU SAW THE PLAT AND SO THIS IS NOW THE ZONE CHANGE, MAKING SURE WE CAN GET THOSE LOTS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PLAT THAT Y'ALL APPROVED LAST MEETING.

OKAY, THANK YOU.

MM-HMM ANYTHING ELSE FOR STAFF? NO.

ALRIGHT, THANK YOU BRETT.

THANK Y'ALL.

THANK YOU.

I'LL OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? I AM.

I'D BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AT THIS POINT.

OKAY.

OKAY.

DO WE HAVE ANY

[00:20:01]

QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? ALRIGHT, WE THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS REQUEST? SEEING NONE.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO IS OPPOSED OR WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION? YES SIR.

IF YOU WOULD PLEASE COME UP TO THE, UH, PODIUM.

GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.

UH, DAVIS HORDE.

1306 WEST MISSOURI AVENUE.

MM-HMM .

THANK YOU.

UM, WE'RE JUST CONCERNED WE WE'RE SOUTH OF THE DEVELOPMENT, UM, AND NO, NO OPPOSITION TO THE UM, TO THE, THE PLAT OTHER THAN THE WATER.

UM, THE WATER FLOOD COMING, THE, THE CURRENT UM, FLOOD ZONE I THINK IS WRONG.

UM, WE'VE BEEN OUT THERE DURING STORMS AND THE WATER DOESN'T GO WHERE THE FLOOD SAYS IT DOES.

UM, AND JUST BE CURIOUS TO SEE WHAT AN UPDATED FLOOD ZONE WOULD SHOW.

I THINK THAT IT, IT ALL GOES TO A STREET AND COMES DOWN AND UH, I'M CONCERNED THAT IT WOULD OVER OVERFILL THE, UH, SADDLE CLUB LAKES, UM, RESERVOIR.

OKAY.

ALRIGHT.

UM, STAFF, WHAT, WHAT KIND OF, UH, INFORMATION DO Y'ALL HAVE ON THE AREA AND, AND ON THAT SURVEY, OBVIOUSLY HE'S MENTIONED THE FLOODPLAIN.

WHAT? SO THAT'S SOMETHING THAT'S CONSIDERED DURING, UM, THE PLATTING PROCESS.

SO IT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY ALL STAFF DEPARTMENTS.

NOW IT COULD HAVE BEEN APPROVED WITH THE DEFERRAL WHERE THEY COME BACK AND, AND SHOW THAT THAT FINAL PLAT, BUT THAT'S NOT REALLY HANDLED.

UH, MORE SO WITH ZONING WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT TODAY, THAT'S STRICTLY DURING PLATTING.

SO YOU'LL SEE THAT FINAL PLAT AGAIN TOO AS A PUBLIC HEARING COMING BACK TO Y'ALL WHENEVER THEY, UH, SUBMIT IT.

OKAY? MM-HMM .

SO DOES THAT, DOES THAT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION AT THIS POINT? THIS IS JUST FOR THE ZONING? YEAH.

YEAH.

AND SO FOR THE, WHEN THEY COME BACK FOR THE FINAL PLAT, THAT'S WHEN THEY'RE GONNA START ADDRESSING THOSE KINDS OF ISSUES.

OKAY, GREAT.

APPRECIATE IT.

OKAY.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

I'D BE GLAD ADDRESS THAT.

SO YOU WOULD YOU PLEASE THIS PROPERTY IS JUST NORTH OF MIDLAND DRAWS AND UH, WITH MOCKINGBIRD CONNECTION, UH, IF Y'ALL ARE FAMILIAR, WHERE MOCKINGBIRD WAS SUPPOSED TO GO THROUGH RIGHT THERE NORTH OF THE POLO CLUB, THERE IS SOME DRAINAGE ISSUES THERE, BUT WE'RE PUTTING A VERY SUBSTANTIAL RETENTION AND DETENTION BASIN, WHICH WILL DO NOTHING BUT IMPROVE THE CONDITIONS.

BUT THERE IS SOME ISSUES THE CITY WILL NEED TO ADDRESS AT SOME POINT IN TIME AS IT, IT GETS DOWN INTO THERE AS UH, IS INDICATED IT, YOU NEVER SEE IT.

YOU LOOK AT WHAT THE STORM A HUNDRED YEAR STORM'S SUPPOSED TO DO AND I'VE LIVED OUT THERE FOR 15, 20 YEARS OR BEEN OUT THERE THAT LONG AND HAVEN'T SEEN IT, BUT I HAVEN'T BEEN OUT THERE A HUNDRED YEARS.

SO, BUT ANY RATE, IT'S UH, WE'VE CERTAINLY DONE A THOROUGH STUDY TO SEE WHAT, MAKE SURE WE'RE ADDRESSING THE RUNOFF THAT WE'RE CREATING.

UM, SO, AND THEN JUST 'CAUSE WE, WE DO HAVE, UH, A COMMENT HERE.

IT LOOKS LIKE, UM, AND MAYBE YOU'VE, YOU'VE TALKED TO MRS. UH, PATTY MCDONALD ABOUT HER PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH.

SHE SAYS THAT SHE HAS ONLY, SHE'S LOOKING FOR AN EASEMENT.

THERE'S ONLY ONE WAY FOR HER TO GET HAY IN AND IT'S UP NEXT TO THAT, NEXT TO WHERE YOUR, YOUR PROPERTY WAS GOING TO BE.

SO HAVE YOU ADDRESSED THAT WITH HER OR, UH, I THINK THAT, WELL I DON'T THINK I'LL INTERFERE WITH THAT AT HER METHOD NOW IT'S PROBABLY FROM THE SOUTH.

OKAY.

AS MICING BIRD WOULD EVENTUALLY, HOPEFULLY GET COMPLETED THROUGH THERE.

I BELIEVE IT'LL GIVE HER BETTER ACCESS FROM BOTH SIDES.

NOW THEY HAVE SOMEWHAT REDIRECTED THE FLOW OF WHAT MILL AND DRAW IS TO WHERE IT RUNS THROUGH HER PROPERTY, BUT THE NORTHERN PORTION OF HER PROPERTY WOULD BE UP ADJACENT TO THE FUTURE MOCKINGBIRD LANE.

OKAY.

SHE, SHE JUST SAYS, AND I, I'LL JUST READ THIS SO THAT I'M NOT SAYING ANYTHING OUT.

UH, SHE SAYS, EVEN THOUGH I, I OBJECT OR I HAVE INDICATED I OBJECT TO THE REQUEST, I WOULD ONLY HAVE A MILD OBJECTION IF THE 50 FOOT EASEMENT REMAINS.

THIS IS THE EASEMENT THAT THE CITY OF MIDLAND CURRENTLY OWNS THAT RUNS EAST AND WEST JUST NORTH OF MY PROPERTY.

I HAVE A GATE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF MY PROPERTY THAT OPENS ONTO THIS EASEMENT AND THAT IS THE ONLY WAY I CAN GET HAY DELIVERED.

THERE IS A DIRT ROAD ON THE EAST SIDE OF MY PROPERTY THAT IS PRIVATELY OWNED.

THE OWNERS ALLOW ME TO USE THIS ROAD, BUT IT IS, DOES NOT HAVE A WIDE ENOUGH GATE TO ACCOMMODATE A HAY DELIVERY TRAILER.

I MUST BE ABLE TO USE MY NORTH GATE THAT OPENS ONTO THIS WIDE EASEMENT.

IF THIS EASEMENT REMAINS AND THE SOUTH PART OF MARK PAYNE'S DEVELOPMENT WOULD BE AE DISTRICT PROPERTIES, I WOULD HAVE NO OBJECTION AT ALL.

IN OTHER WORDS,

[00:25:01]

JUST NORTH OF MY PROPERTY WOULD BE A WIDE EASEMENT AND NORTH OF THAT WOULD BE AE ESTATES PROPERTIES.

IF BOTH OF THESE THINGS ARE WHAT IS PLANNED THEN I HAVE NO OBJECTION.

I BELIEVE THAT'S A UTILITY EASEMENT IS ACTUALLY WHAT IT IS.

THERE'S, THERE'S A MAJOR SEWER LINE THAT RUNS JUST NORTH OF HER PROPERTY.

SO WE'LL HAVE, WE WON'T BE DOING ANY OF THE DEVELOPMENT ON TOP OF IT.

UH, AND MOCKINGBIRD WILL ACTUALLY, SHE MAY NOT HAVE, WE WON'T CHANGE THAT GATE, LET'S PUT IT THAT WAY.

AND IT IS THE CITY'S EASEMENT.

NOW NORTH OF THAT WE WILL BE BUILDING SOME OF THE DETENTION BUT IT DOESN'T REALLY INTERFERE WITH HER, THE ACCESS TO HER PROPERTY.

SO.

OKAY.

ANY, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR OUR APPLICANT AT THIS TIME? NO SIR.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

APPRECIATE YOUR TIME MARK.

ALRIGHT, IS THERE ANYONE ELSE HERE WHO HAS MORE, UH, QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS ITEM OR IS OPPOSED? ALRIGHT, NOT SEEING ANY.

I WILL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND WE'LL GO TO THE COMMISSION.

MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.

I SECOND.

ALL RIGHT.

I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE FROM COMMISSIONER CIGA AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER GARZA.

IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM? NO SIR.

ALRIGHT, THANK YOU.

LET'S VOTE.

MOTION PASSED SIX TO ZERO.

[13. - Hold a public hearing and consider a request by Bliss Jung for a Zone Change from RR, Regional Retail District to LI, Light Industrial District on Lot 1, Block 2, West 191 Industrial Park, Section 3, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located on the west side of State Highway 191, approximately 1,185 feet northeast of Farm to Market 1788.) (DISTRICT: 4) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

ITEM NUMBER 13, HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST BY BLISS YOUNG FOR A ZONE CHANGE FROM RR REGIONAL RETAIL DISTRICT TO LI LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT ON LOT ONE BLOCK TWO WEST 1 91 INDUSTRIAL PARK, SECTION THREE, CITY AND COUNTY OF BELAND, TEXAS, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF STATE HIGHWAY 1 91, APPROXIMATELY 1,185 FEET NORTHEAST OF FARM TO MARKET 1788.

THANK YOU CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS.

SO THIS IS A ZONE CHANGE FOR PROPERTY, UM, OUT OVER IN 1 91 WHERE IT TURNS TO ODESSA, UH, DISTRICT FOUR AND IT'S TO ALLOW FOR A CONTRACTOR SHOP OR STORAGE YARD.

UM, THE AREA RIGHT NOW IS ZONED REGIONAL RETAIL, HOWEVER IT'S SLOWLY TRANSITIONING TO, UH, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.

UM, AND THEY'RE PROPOSING THAT ZONING AS WELL.

LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.

HERE'S A CURRENT LOOK AT THE PROPERTY ON OUR AERIAL HERE.

YOU CAN SEE IT'S MOSTLY SURROUNDED BY VACANT LAND.

UM, JUST TO THE, THE UH, WEST THERE, THERE'S ACTUALLY NOW AN AUTOMOBILE SERVICE GARAGE.

THAT'S THE ONLY, UM, ONLY THING TO POINT OUT THERE REALLY.

HERE'S A LOOK AT THE PROPERTY THAT'S CURRENTLY, IT'S BEEN GOING, IT'S BEEN UNDER CONSTRUCTION.

IT JUST HASN'T HAD ITS, UM, CO APPROVED YET BECAUSE IT'S WAITING ON THIS.

OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOESN'T DESIGNATE THIS AREA AS ANYTHING.

UM, SO THERE'S NO POLICIES, UM, TO, TO GUIDE US IN THAT NO OBJECTIONS WERE RECEIVED.

AND UM, ONCE AGAIN, BECAUSE THE AREA IS TRANSITIONING TO THIS TYPE OF, OF ZONING AND USE, WE'RE OKAY WITH THIS.

SO WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL.

I'M OPEN FOR ANY QUESTIONS.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR LANDON? ALRIGHT, THANK YOU.

ALRIGHT, APPRECIATE IT.

OPENING UP THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? I'M NOT SEEING THE APPLICANT.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS REQUEST? SEEING NONE.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO IS OPPOSED OR WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION? SEEING NONE, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

WE WILL GO TO THE COMMISSION.

A MOTION FOR APPROVAL.

I HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL FROM COMMISSIONER GARZA AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER OFIELD MARTIN.

OH MARTIN, SORRY.

Y'ALL GOTTA QUIT DOING THAT.

LET'S TO MOVE BACK.

SECOND IS FROM COMMISSIONER MARTIN.

IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? LET'S VOTE.

MOTION PASSED.

SIX TO ZERO.

THANK YOU.

ITEM NUMBER 14,

[14. - Hold a public hearing and consider a Final Plat of Northgate Addition, Section 28, being a replat of Lot 5, Block 34, Northgate Addition, Section 19, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located on the south side of Northbrook Lane, approximately 350 feet east of San Antonio Avenue.) (DISTRICT: 1) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A FINAL PLAT OF NORTHGATE.

A ADDITION SECTION 28 BEING A REPL OF LOT FIVE BLOCK 34 NORTHGATE EDITION.

SECTION 19, CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS.

GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF NORTHBROOK LANE, APPROXIMATELY 350 FEET EAST OF SAN ANTONIO AVENUE.

THANK YOU CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS ANGELINA TONINI PLANNER TO PRESENT.

ITEM NUMBER 14.

ITEM 14 ON THE AGENDA IS A PLA SUBMITTED BY MAVERICK ENGINEERING, UM, FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4 8 0 7 NORTHBROOK LANE FOR FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.

AND THE PLAT

[00:30:01]

ACREAGE IS POINT 33 ACRES WITH ONE EXISTING LOT GOING INTO TWO LOTS.

IT'S CURRENTLY ZONED TWO F TWO FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT WITH SURROUNDING ZONING OF PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR A SHOPPING CENTER.

CURRENTLY IT IS VACANT LAND WITH SURROUNDING USES OF A MEDICAL FACILITY TO THE NORTH TO THE EAST IS A PARKING LOT TO THE SOUTH IS A CAR DEALERSHIP TO THE WEST IS VACANT LAND WITH A PROPOSED USE BEING A DUPLEX.

HERE'S A SITE PHOTO OF THE PROPERTY.

UH, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATES THIS AS UM, URBAN MEDIUM.

THIS REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE WITH OUR TALL CITY TOMORROW.

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ONE OBJECTION WAS RECEIVED, UM, BUT STAFF DOES ULTIMATELY RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST.

THANK YOU.

AND I'M OPEN FOR ANY QUESTIONS.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? THANK YOU.

ANGELINA, OPENING UP THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IS THERE ANYONE OR RATHER IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? I DON'T SEE THE APPLICANT.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS REQUEST? SEEING NONE.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO IS OPPOSED OR WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION? ALL RIGHT, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND WE'LL GO TO THE COMMISSION.

I'LL MOVE FOR APPROVAL.

I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE FROM COMMISSIONER GARZA.

I'LL SECOND.

I HAVE A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER OFIELD.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL RIGHT, LET'S VOTE.

MOTION PASSED.

SIX TO ZERO.

THANK YOU.

ITEM NUMBER 15,

[15. - Hold a public hearing and consider a Preliminary Plat of Western Hills Addition, Section 15, being a replat of a 4.73-acre tract of land out of Lot 22, Block 22, Correction Plat of Western Hills, Section 2, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located on the east side of Beal Parkway, approximately 145 feet south of Blue Haven Drive.) (DISTRICT: 4) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

WHOLLY PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF WESTERN HILLS EDITION SECTION 15 BEING A REPL OF A 7.4 0.73 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF LOT 22, BLOCK 22.

CORRECTION PLAT OF WESTERN HILLS SECTION TWO.

CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS.

GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF BEALE PARKWAY, APPROXIMATELY 145 FEET SOUTH OF BLUE HAVEN DRIVE.

THANK YOU CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS.

THIS IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTED BY MAVERICK ENGINEERING ON BEHALF OF PARKWAY VILLAS.

LLC FOR A PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF BEAL PARKWAY.

UM, AND WE ARE PLANNING FOR FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.

PLOT IS 4.73 ACRES, UM, WITH EXISTING NUMBER OF LOTS OF ZERO AND A PROPOSED OF 40.

THE CURRENT ZONING IS TH TOWNHOUSE DWELLING DISTRICT TO THE NORTH IS TOWNHOUSE DWELLING DISTRICT TO THE EAST.

SF THREE TO THE SOUTH IS MF 16 AND TO THE WEST IS A PD FOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT.

THE CURRENT USE IS VACANT LAND SURROUNDING USES TO THE NORTH AND EAST ARE SINGLE.

FAMILY HOUSING TO THE SOUTH IS VACANT LAND IN TOWN HOMES AND TO THE WEST IS A MEDICAL FACILITY WITH A PROPOSED USE FOR THIS PROPERTY OF TOWN HOMES.

HERE'S A SITE PHOTO OF THE PROPERTY.

UM, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOES THIS AS URBAN RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM.

THIS REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE WITH OUR TALL CITY TOMORROW.

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, NO OBJECTIONS WERE RECEIVED AND STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS.

THANK YOU.

AND I'M OPEN FOR QUESTIONS.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU ANGELINA.

THANK YOU.

OPENING UP THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OTHERWISE DEFER TO STAFF.

THANK YOU, APPRECIATE IT.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS REQUEST? SEEING NONE, IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO IS OPPOSED OR WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION ALSO SEEING NONE I WILL CLOSE OUR PUBLIC HEARING.

I, I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.

I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE REQUEST FROM COMMISSIONER CIGA.

I'LL SECOND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER GARZA.

IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? OKAY, LET'S VOTE.

MOTION PASSED.

SIX TO ZERO.

THANK YOU.

THAT ENDS OUR, OUR TIME FOR UH, OUR CON UH, SORRY OUR PUBLIC HEARINGS.

UH, THIS NOW

[16. - Motion approving, with staff's recommended conditions, a Preliminary Plat of Devon Addition, Section 10, being a plat of a 2.90-acre tract of land out of Section 8, Block 40, T-2-S, T&P RR Co. Survey, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located on the south side of Younger Road, approximately 315 feet west of Fortress Drive.) (DISTRICT: 4) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

LEADS INTO OUR MISCELLANEOUS ITEM NUMBER 16, MOTION APPROVING WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS.

A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF DEVON EDITION SECTION 10 BEING A PLAT OF A 2.9 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF SECTION EIGHT BLOCK 40 T TWO ST AND P RAILROAD COMMISSION SURVEY CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS.

GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF YOUNGER ROAD APPROXIMATELY 315

[00:35:02]

FEET WEST OF FORTRESS DRIVE.

THANK YOU CHAIRMAN.

COMMISSIONERS RISCO PLANET TO PRESENT.

ITEM NUMBER 16.

ITEM NUMBER 16.

THE AGENDA IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTED BY MAVERICK ENGINEER FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH SIDE OF THE YOUNGER ROADS APPROXIMATELY 350 FEET WEST OF FORTRESS DRIVE IN ORDER TO PLAT 202.90 ACRES INTO FOUR LOTS TO BE ABLE TO OBTAIN PERMITS FOR A FUTURE RESIDENTIAL.

THE CURRENT ZONING IS TP TECHNOLOGY PARK DISTRICT.

THOSE SURROUNDING USES, UH, IS ALL TP TECHNOLOGY PARK DISTRICTS.

THE CURRENT USE IS VACANT AS WELL AS THE NORTH EAST IS A HOTEL SOUTH AND WEST.

OUR INDUSTRIAL USE WITH THE PROPOSED USE BEING INDUSTRIAL THE TALK COM TALK COMPARISON PLAN DOES NOT DESIGNATE THIS AREA.

STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST FOR THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE ANY.

SO THIS IS, THIS IS FOR RESIDENTIAL, INDUSTRIAL, INDUSTRIAL.

IT'S, IT'S BY THE AIRPORT.

OKAY, I THOUGHT I HEARD RESIDENTIAL.

THAT'S, THAT'S MY, MY BAD.

ALRIGHT, JUST WANTED TO CHECK ON THAT.

OKAY, THANK YOU.

ALL RIGHT, ANYTHING FROM THE COMMISSION I MOTION FOR APPROVAL? I HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL FROM COMMISSIONER GARZA.

SECOND.

A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER MARTIN.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? NO SIR.

LET'S VOTE.

MOTION PASSED.

SIX TO ZERO.

THANK YOU.

ITEM NUMBER 17 HAS BEEN PULLED FROM OUR AGENDA.

ITEM NUMBER 18,

[18. - Motion approving, with staff's recommended conditions, a Preliminary Plat of Limestone Addition, Section 1, being a plat of a 54.49-acre tract of land out of Sections 11 and 14, Block 40, T-2-S, T&P RR Co. Survey, Midland County, Texas. (Generally located at the southeast corner of the intersection of South County Road 1250 and West Interstate 20 Service Road.) (EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

MOTION APPROVING WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS.

A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF LIMESTONE EDITION SECTION ONE BEING A PLAT OF A 54.49 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF SECTIONS 11 AND 14 BLOCK 40 T TWO ST AND P RAILROAD COMMISSION SURVEY MIDLAND COUNTY, TEXAS GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF SOUTH COUNTY ROAD 1 2 50 AND WEST INTERSTATE 20 SERVICE ROAD.

AFTERNOON CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS LORI ELLIOTT TO PRESENT ITEM 18.

ITEM 18 ON THE AGENDA IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTED BY MAVERICK ENGINEERING ON BEHALF OF MARLON MUSKETT PROPERTIES LLC AND NORTH SPUR PROPERTIES LLC FOR THE PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF UH, SOUTH COUNTY ROAD 1250 AND WEST I 20 SERVICE ROAD.

IN THE ETJ THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO PLAT 54.49 ACRES INTO 11 LOTS FOR FUTURE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT.

THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY VACANT LAND AND THE PROPOSED USES FOR INDUSTRIAL USES UM, TO THE NORTH IS WEST.

I 20 TO THE SOUTHEAST AND WEST IS VACANT LAND.

THIS LAND USE IS DESIGNATED AS BP I 20 BUSINESS PARK DISTRICT SUPPORTED USES ARE A MIX OF INDUSTRIAL SUCH AS WAREHOUSING AND DISTRIBUTION CENTERS.

SO THE REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE TALL CITY TOMORROW.

PLAN BECAUSE THE PLAT IS OVER 25 ACRES THAT WILL NEED COUNCIL APPROVAL AND IS SCHEDULED FOR THE MARCH 24TH MEETING.

STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST WITH THE STANDARD CONDITIONS LISTED HERE, INCLUDING THE APPROVAL AT CITY COUNCIL.

THANK YOU AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? THANK YOU LORI.

I THANK YOU.

DO I HEAR ANY MOTIONS? I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE.

I SECOND.

ALRIGHT, I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE FROM COMMISSIONER OFIELD AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER CIGA.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THE MATTER? OKAY, LET'S VOTE.

MOTION PASSED.

SIX TO ZERO THANK YOU.

ITEM NUMBER 19,

[19. - Motion approving, with staff's recommended conditions, a Preliminary Plat of West 191 Industrial Park, Section 18, being a replat of Lot 1A, Block 3, West 191 Industrial Park, Section 10, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located on the north side of State Highway 191, approximately 1,780 feet east of North Farm to Market Road 1788.) (DISTRICT: 4) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

MOTION APPROVING WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS.

A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF WEST 1 91 INDUSTRIAL PARK SECTION 18 BEING A RE PLAT OF LOT ONE A BLOCK THREE WEST 1 91 INDUSTRIAL PARK.

SECTION 10 CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS.

GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF STATE HIGHWAY 1 91 APPROXIMATELY 1,780 FEET EAST OF NORTH FARM TO MARKET ROAD 1788 AFTERNOON CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS PLANNER LORI ELLIOTT TO PRESENT.

ITEM 19.

ITEM 19 ON THE AGENDAS.

A PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTED BY MAVERICK ENGINEERING ON BEHALF OF PERFECT SEA.

LLC FOR THE PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF STATE HEIGHT 1 91 IN DISTRICT FOUR THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REPL ONE LOT INTO TWO FOR FUTURE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT.

THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY VACANT LAND AND THE

[00:40:01]

PROPOSED USE IS COMMERCIAL.

THE PROPERTY'S TO THE NORTH ARE INDUSTRIAL USES INTO THE SOUTHEAST AND WEST IS VACANT LAND.

THE LAND HAS NO DESIGNATION IN THE TALL CITY TOMORROW.

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

SO THERE ARE NO POLICIES ESTABLISHED FOR IT.

WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT WITH THE FOLLOWING STANDARD CONDITIONS HERE AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE.

QUESTIONS FOR STAFF.

THANK YOU LORI.

THANK YOU.

DO I HEAR ANY MOTIONS? I MOVE FOR APPROVAL.

I HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL FROM COMMISSIONER MARTIN.

I'LL SECOND AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER GARZA.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? NO SIR.

ALRIGHT, LET'S VOTE.

MOTION PASSED SIX TO ZERO.

ITEM NUMBER 20,

[20. - Motion approving, with staff's recommended conditions, a Preliminary Plat of Gateway Plaza, Section 15, being a replat of Lot 1C, Block 4, Gateway Plaza, Section 8, and a 13.76-acre tract of land out of Section 1, Block 40, T-2-S, T&P RR Co. Survey, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located on the west side of Tradewinds Boulevard, approximately 1,200 feet north of West Interstate 20.) (DISTRICT: 4), (EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

MOTION APPROVING WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS.

A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF GATEWAY PLAZA SECTION 15 BEING A REPL OF LOT ONE C BLOCK FOUR GATEWAY PLAZA SECTION EIGHT AND A 13.76 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF SECTION ONE BLOCK 20 T TWO ST AND P RAILROAD COMMISSION.

SURVEY COUNTY IN CITY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS.

GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF TRADEWINDS BOULEVARD APPROXIMATELY 1,200 FEET NORTH OF WEST INTERSTATE 20.

THANK YOU CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS.

BRITT MURRAY, SENIOR PLANNER TO PRESENT.

ITEM 20.

ITEM 20 ON THE AGENDA AS A PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTED BY NEY MERTZ FOR THE RECONFIGURATION OF THE CURRENT LOT LAYOUT FOR THE PROPERTIES LOCATED AT 1700 SOUTH TRADE WINDS BOULEVARD AND 59 0 4 STATE HIGHWAY 80.

THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO PLAT 18.07 ACRES INTO TWO LOTS.

PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED AS A PD FOR A HOUSING DEVELOPMENT IN PART TECHNOLOGY PARK DISTRICT IN PART AND A PORTION GOES INTO THE ETJ SURROUNDINGS.

ZONING INTO THE EAST IS A PD FOR A HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND THE PROPERTIES OF THE NORTH, SOUTH AND WEST HAVE NO ZONING SINCE THEY'RE NOT WITHIN CITY LIMITS.

THE CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY IS VACANT.

LAND SURROUNDING USE OF THE NORTH IS VACANT LAND AND AN APARTMENT COMPLEX OF THE EAST AND COMMERCIAL USE TO THE SOUTH AND WEST.

THE PROPOSED USE IS STILL BEING DECIDED ON AT THIS TIME.

THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATES THIS LOCATION AS A SPECIAL STUDY AREA.

NO, PAUL HAS HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED FOR THIS DESIGNATION.

STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS.

THANK YOU YOUR HONOR.

OPEN FOR QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE 'EM.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR BRETT? SO THIS IS JUST FOR THE PLAT? YES, THIS IS THE PLAT.

DOES WOULD THE ZONING CHANGE BE? YES SIR.

ONCE THEY COME BACK AND FIGURE OUT THEIR USE, THEY'LL HAVE TO MAKE SURE IT ALIGNS WITH EITHER THE CURRENT ZONING THAT'S THERE OR THEY'LL HAVE TO DO A ZONING CHANGE AND SO THEY'RE BASICALLY JUST PLOTTING IT TO SELL IT AND THAT PERSON WILL COME INTO THE ZONE CHANGE.

PERFECT, THANK YOU.

MM-HMM .

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I HAVE A QUESTION NOT RELATED TO THE ITEM, BUT I NOTICED THE APPLICATIONS ARE NOT IN THE PACKAGE.

WE ARE HAVING ISSUES WITH APPLICANT APPLICATIONS TOO.

YEAH, SO THE REASON WE HAVE INTENTIONALLY OMITTED THE APPLICATIONS FROM THE PACKET IS BECAUSE WE'VE RECENTLY BEEN DEALING WITH UM, ISSUES WHERE SCAMMERS ARE LOOKING AT THE PACKET, OBTAINING THE APPLICANT'S, UH, CONTACT INFO AND THEN SENDING THEM SCAM EMAILS, ASKING TO WIRE TRANSFER MONEY, UM, IMPERSONATING CITY STAFF AS WELL AS IMPERSONATING MEMBERS OF THE PNZ COMMISSION.

AND SO IN AN EFFORT TO COMBAT THAT, WE HAVE UM, OMITTED THE APPLICATIONS FROM THE PACKET.

OKAY.

AND THEY'VE BEEN NOTIFIED, RIGHT, THE APPLICANTS BY THE CITY OF THIS COMMERCE NOT TO USE THE LINK OR WHATEVER THEY'RE RECEIVING TO PAY OR HAVE WE MAKE ANY PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS SO PEOPLE ARE AWARE? OH YES, WE HAVE.

YES.

WE'VE WORKED WITH OUR PUBLIC, UM, INFORMATION OFFICE TO RELEASE A STATEMENT OUT.

UM, JUST EXPLAINING, YOU KNOW, MAKE SURE THAT YOU'RE VERIFYING THE DOMAIN THAT YOU'RE RECEIVING THE EMAIL FROM, UM, AND, AND NOTIFYING THEM OF THE SITUATION.

OKAY? MM-HMM .

THANK YOU.

MM-HMM ALRIGHT, THANK Y'ALL.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

DO I HEAR ANY MOTIONS? I MOVE TO APPROVE MOTION FOR APPROVAL BY COMMISSIONER OFIELD.

SECOND.

SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER CIGA.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? LET'S VOTE.

MOTION PASSED.

SIX TO ZERO.

THANK YOU.

ITEM NUMBER 21.

[21. - Motion approving a reinstatement of an approved Preliminary Plat of Sheriff Gary Painter Subdivision, being a 236.34-acre tract of land out of Section 4, Block 38, T-2- S, T&P RR Co. Survey, Midland County, Texas. (Generally located at the northwest corner of the intersection of East County Road 110 and South County Road 1140.) (EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACЕ)]

MOTION APPROVING A REINSTATEMENT OF AN APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SHERIFF GARY PAINTER SUBDIVISION BEING A 236.34 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF SECTION FOUR BLOCK 38 T TWO STMP RAILROAD COMMISSION SURVEY MIDLAND COUNTY, TEXAS GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF EAST COUNTY ROAD ONE 10 AND SOUTH COUNTY ROAD

[00:45:01]

1140.

THANK YOU CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS.

BRITT MURRAY, SENIOR PLANNER TO PRESENT.

ITEM 21.

ITEM 21 ON THE AGENDA IS OF PRELIMINARY PLAT REINSTATEMENT SUBMITTED BY PARK HILL ON BEHALF OF MIDLAND COUNTY FOR THE REDEVELOPMENT OF THE CURRENT LAYOUT FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2214 SOUTH COUNTY ROAD 1140.

THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A PLAT 236.34 ACRES INTO FIVE LOTS.

CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY IS VACANT.

LAND SURROUNDING USE OF THE NORTH IS INDUSTRIAL USE.

UH, VACANT LAND OF THE SOUTH, EAST AND WEST.

THE PROPOSED USE IS FOR A COUNTY JAIL.

THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN HAS NO DESIGNATION FOR THIS PROPERTY.

SINCE IT'S BEEN SIX MONTHS SINCE THE ORIGINAL PRELIMINARY PLAT WAS APPROVED, THE ITEM MUST BE REINSTATED AND THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE SEEING TODAY.

UH, THE PRELIMINARY PLAT WAS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ON MAY 5TH, 2025, AND BY CITY COUNCIL ON MAY 13TH, 2025.

STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS.

I'M OPEN FOR QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE ANY.

WERE THERE ANY CHANGES BETWEEN THE TWO PLATS? NO SIR.

GREAT.

SORRY.

ANYTHING ELSE FOR THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

MOTIONS.

I MOVE FOR APPROVE.

I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE FROM COMMISSIONER MARTIN.

I SECOND.

SECOND.

I'LL TAKE THE SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER CIGA.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? NO SIR.

LET'S VOTE.

MOTION PAST SIX TO ZERO.

ITEM NUMBER

[22. - Motion approving a Final Plat of Sheriff Gary Painter Subdivision, being a 236.34-acre tract of land out of Section 4, Block 38, T-2-S, T&P RR Co. Survey, Midland County, Texas. (Generally located at the northwest corner of the intersection of East County Road 110 and South County Road 1140.) (EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

22.

MOTION APPROVING A FINAL PLAT OF SHERIFF GARY PAINTER SUBDIVISION BEING A 236.34 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF SECTION FOUR BLOCK 38 T TWO STMP RAILROAD COMMISSION SURVEY.

MIDLAND COUNTY, TEXAS GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF EAST COUNTY ROAD ONE 10 AND SOUTH COUNTY ROAD 1140.

THANK Y'ALL.

SO THIS ONE MIGHT LOOK FAMILIAR.

UH, WE JUST REINSTATED IT SO A LOT OF THE INFORMATION'S THE SAME.

.

UM, SO THE PRELIMINARY PLAT WAS JUST REINSTATED.

UM, STAFF IS RECOMMENDING DENIAL FOR THIS PLAT, UH, SIMPLY BECAUSE SOME OF OUR ENGINEERING CONCERNS.

UM, REGARDING THE PLAT, UH, WE, WE HAVEN'T HAD THE TIME TO REVIEW THE DRAINAGE REPORT.

WE STILL HAVE IT, UM, ON THE CITY'S END AND AS WELL AS WE NEVER RECEIVED DEFERRAL LETTERS FOR PAVING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS.

WE DO HAVE THE APPLICANT HERE AND WE ALSO HAVE A MEMBER OF OUR, UH, ENGINEERING TEAM HERE AS WELL TO HELP ANSWER QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU.

MM-HMM .

YOU SAID THAT UM, YOU'RE RECOMMENDING DENIAL AND IT'S MOSTLY BECAUSE YOU NEED SOME MORE TIME CITY-WISE OR THAT THAT MIGHT APPEAR TO BE THE CASE.

I THINK IF YOU HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT AND AND OUR ENGINEERING TEAM THERE MIGHT BE, IT MIGHT BE MAKE MORE SENSE AS FAR AS THE PLANNING'S IN THOUGH WE'RE GOOD TO GO ON IT.

IT'S JUST, UH, WAITING ON THOSE THINGS TO BE FINISHED UP, UM, WITH ENGINEERING TEAM AND MAKING SURE WE'RE GOOD TO GO ON ALL ASPECTS OF THE CITY.

ALRIGHT, I WOULD WELCOME THE APPLICANT TO COME KIND OF EXPLAIN A LITTLE BIT MORE TO US WHILE THE APPLICANT'S COMING UP.

UM, I'D JUST LIKE TO ADD TO WHAT MR. MURRAY SAID.

UM, THE RE SPECIFICALLY THE REQUIREMENT THAT WE'RE DENYING FOR IS THE, UM, THE REQUIREMENT FOR A DRAINAGE STUDY THAT NEEDS TO BE APPROVED, NOT JUST RECEIVED BUT APPROVED.

UM, AND THEN WE'RE ALSO DENYING FOR THE, UM, UH, THE PAVING NOT BEING, UM, UP TO CITY STANDARDS BUT ALSO OR DEFERRAL BEING REQUESTED.

SO THOSE ARE THE TWO REQUIREMENTS THAT WE'RE RECOMMENDING DENIAL FOR.

OKAY.

YEP.

ALRIGHT.

GOOD AFTERNOON COMMISSIONERS.

JOSH WALLER WITH PARKHILL REPRESENTING MIDLAND COUNTY.

UM, THE PAVING ASPECT, THE COUNTY ROADS WILL ALWAYS BE UNDER COUNTY CONTROL, SO THERE'S NO NEED TO UPDATE TO CITY OF MIDLAND STANDARDS.

THIS IS FOR THE MIDLAND COUNTY JAIL.

SO THE PROPERTY IS ALSO UNDER MIDLAND COUNTY'S CONTROL.

UM, AS FAR AS THE DRAINAGE, THEY WROTE THE DRAINAGE MANUAL FOR THE COUNTY FOR THIS PROJECT.

SO, UH, MIDLAND COUNTY HAD THEIR APPROVAL PROCESS AND THIS WAS ALSO SUBMITTED BACK IN DECEMBER OF 2025.

AND I'M NOT SURE HOW IT GOT MISSED, BUT, UH, RESUBMITTED THE SAME REPORT THIS PAST FRIDAY ONCE I FOUND OUT THAT THEY DIDN'T HAVE IT IN THEIR HANDS.

OKAY.

WITH WITH THE RECOMMENDATION TO, UM, DENY THIS REQUEST JUST SEEMS LIKE THERE'S SOME THINGS THAT JUST NEED TO GET, GET DONE.

WOULD IT BE ADVANTAGEOUS FOR US TO DECIDE TO DEFER THIS TO THE NEXT MEETING AND THEN THAT WOULD ALLOW US AT LEAST TWO EXTRA WEEKS FOR ALL THE OTHER THINGS TO HOPEFULLY GET FIGURED OUT IN THAT TIME? SO THE COMMISSION, THE MAKE THE COMMISSION ITSELF CAN'T, UM, DEFER THE PLAT,

[00:50:01]

BUT UM, IF THE APPLICANT OR THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE APPLICANT IS WILLING TO AGREE TO AN EXTENSION, UM, SAY FOR EXAMPLE FOR THE PLAT TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE NEXT P AND Z MEETING, THAT WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE AND THEY CAN JUST STATE THAT ON THE RECORD HERE.

OKAY.

WOULD YOU THINK THAT THAT'S SOMETHING AS LONG AS THE APPLICANT'S OKAY WITH THAT? YEAH, I THINK I, I I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO EXTEND FOR THE NEXT MEETING.

SO MAYBE IF THERE'S ANYTHING THAT IS MISSING AND MAYBE IT WAS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT AND MAYBE WE'RE JUST MISSING TO HAPPEN WITH STAFF, MAYBE WE HAVE TWO WEEKS TO, TO FIGURE THAT OUT INSTEAD OF DENYING THE REQUEST AND MAKE THE APPLICANT TO COME BACK AND REAPPLY.

I THINK IT'S BEST JUST TO GIVE AN EXTENSION IN MY OPINION.

OKAY.

IS THE APPLICANT OKAY WITH THAT THOUGH? I THINK IS THE QUESTION.

YES.

MIDLAND COUNTY WOULD PREFER TO HAVE IT GO TODAY, BUT IF Y'ALL ARE GOING TO WANT THE EXTENSION, THEY'LL PROBABLY BE OKAY WITH THAT AS WELL.

THIS HAS BEEN WHAT, THREE YEARS IN THE PROGRESS? YEAH, SO, UH, THEY'RE, THEY'VE BEEN WORKING ON IT AND THEY'RE READY TO KIND OF HAVE IT SOLIDIFIED.

I BET THEY ARE.

THE THE QUESTION THAT I HAVE IS IF, IF WE DECIDE, YOU KNOW, NOT THAT WE KNOW THAT FOR SURE, BUT IF WE DECIDE THAT HEY, WE'RE JUST GONNA DENY THIS BECAUSE WE'VE BEEN RECOMMENDED DENIAL, UM, WHAT WOULD THAT DO TO THE PROCESS FOR, FOR THE COUNTY? THAT WOULD JUST MEAN THAT THEY WOULD NEED TO, UM, ADDRESS, UM, THE REQUIREMENTS THAT THEY, THAT WE ARE DENYING FOR.

UM, STATE LAW DOES NOT PERMIT THE CITY TO SPECIFY A TIMEFRAME BY WHICH THE REQUIREMENTS, UM, NEED TO BE ADDRESSED.

SO AS SOON AS LONG AS THEY, UM, ADDRESS THOSE REQUIREMENTS AND THEN SUBMIT WITHIN THE, UM, SUBMITTAL WINDOWS THAT THE CITY HAS ESTABLISHED, THEN UM, THAT WOULD SUFFICE FOR THE NEXT, UH, SUBMITTAL.

OKAY.

MM-HMM .

ALRIGHT.

I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT THAT ONE OF THOSE REQUIREMENTS IS PAVING AND RIGHT, RIGHT.

BUT THERE, UH, DID I MISHEAR THAT THERE'S SUPPOSED TO BE, UM, SOME KIND OF APPROVED, UM, DRAINAGE WAIVER FOR THAT? YEAH, WELL, YES AND I'LL HAVE, UM, I'LL HAVE ADRIAN ACOSTA, HE'S, HE'S THE ENGINEERING MANAGER.

I'LL, I'LL HAVE HIM COME UP HERE AND PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON THAT.

OKAY.

IF, IF YOU WOULDN'T MIND.

SO YES, UH, WE'VE HAD TIME TO LOOK AT THE DRAINAGE REPORT AND WE HAVE CONFIRMED THAT IT IS APPROVED FOR PLANNING PURPOSES.

SO THAT STRIKES ONE OF THE, UH, THE DENIAL, UH, REASONINGS.

OKAY.

UM, AS FAR AS THE PAVEMENT, THE REASON FOR WE, WE UNDERSTAND IT IS IN THE COUNTY IT IS A COUNTY PLAT AND ULTIMATELY THE COUNTY IS GONNA MAINTAIN THOSE ROADS BECAUSE THAT'S IT BEING OUT IN THE COUNTY.

UM, THE ISSUE IS IS THAT THERE'S AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY AND THE STATE THAT GIVES THE CITY OR BETWEEN THE COUNTY AND THE CITY THAT GIVES THE CITY THE, UH, THE, UH, AUTHORITY TO USE THE CITY CODE AS FAR AS ENFORCING THE PLANNING REQUIREMENTS.

SO AS PART OF OUR PLANNING REQUIREMENTS IS TO BRING UP THEIR FRONTAGE TO CITY STANDARDS.

SO THAT'S WHERE THIS COMMENT IS COMING FROM.

BUT WE UNDERSTAND, LIKE YOU SAID, IT IS A COUNTY ROAD AND IT IS GONNA BE MAINTAINED BY COUNTY, BUT ACCORDING TO THE CITY CODE, OUR HANDS ARE KIND OF TIED IN THAT SENSE.

OKAY.

BUT I MEAN IT'S, WE UNDERSTAND IT, IT'S STILL, IT'S THE COUNTY ROAD AND THEY'RE GONNA MAINTAIN IT TO COUNTY STANDARDS.

RIGHT.

SO THEY'LL, THEY'LL, THEY'LL MAINTAIN IT UP TO COUNTY STANDARDS.

JUST THE ONLY ISSUE SEEMS TO BE THAT BECAUSE OF THE WAY EVERYTHING'S WRITTEN, THE CITY HAS THE REQUIREMENT, IF YOU WILL, TO SAY THAT THEY NEED TO COME UP TO CITY STANDARDS.

BUT I GUESS THE QUESTION BECOMES IS, IS THE CITY OKAY WITH THEM NOT COMING UP TO CITY STANDARDS AT THIS POINT? WHAT I MEAN I GET IS THAT SOMETHING THAT WOULD NEED TO ESSENTIALLY BE APPROVED BY COUNCIL? I THINK THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WOULD NEED TO BE DECIDED BY COUNCIL.

UH, AND SINCE OUR ENGINEER ALREADY ADDRESSED THE DRAINAGE REPORT, I THINK THAT THAT SECOND ISSUE IS UP TO THE COUNCIL.

IT'S NOT REALLY UP TO US TO DENY.

YEAH.

THIS PERSON, I, I, I THINK JUST IN MY OWN IT, ONCE WE'VE GOT THOSE OTHER, WE'VE ALREADY KIND OF GOT ONE THAT'S ESSENTIALLY BEEN SLASHED, THE OTHER ONE AND IT'S JUST COMES UP TO WHATEVER STANDARD WE, WE WANT TO SAY IS APPROPRIATE.

IT OBVIOUSLY WITH WHERE THIS IS LOCATED, AS LONG AS THE TRANSITION FROM WHAT THE COUNTY IS DOING TO WHAT THE, THE CITY CA UH, THE CITY STANDARD IS BETWEEN THIS PLA WHATEVER IS, IS CONNECTED TO THE REST OF THE CITY.

I DON'T SEE WHY THERE WOULDN'T BE ANY PROBLEM ALLOWING THIS

[00:55:01]

TO BE AT COUNTY STANDARD, BUT UH, I MAY BE THE ONLY ONE WHO HAS THAT THOUGHT, SO, SO I DON'T THINK THAT WE CAN EVEN DECIDE ON THAT.

I THINK THAT'S UP TO THE WE WE CAN RECOMMEND THAT'S, THAT'S ALL WE'RE HERE HERE TO DO IS WHETHER WE THINK THAT THAT IS APPROPRIATE OR NOT BASED ON WHAT THE STAFF IS ALLOWING US TO, TO DECIDE ON.

SO YOUR, YOUR MOTION, IS IT STILL ON THE TABLE TO EXTEND OR DO YOU WELL AFTER HEARING UM, OR COMMENTS FROM OUR ENGINEER, I WOULD LIKE TO CHANGE MY MOTION AND APPROVE THE REQUEST.

ALRIGHT, WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE FROM COMMISSIONER CIGA.

I'LL SECOND IT.

THERE IS A SECOND NOW FROM COMMISSIONER OFIELD.

IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS? ALRIGHT, LET'S GO AHEAD AND VOTE.

MOTION PASSED.

SIX TO ZERO.

ALRIGHT, THANK YOU.

ITEM NUMBER 23,

[23. - Motion approving, with staff's recommended conditions, a Preliminary Plat of Ruckus Addition, Section 3, being a replat of Lot 1, Block 1, Ruckus Addition, and a 70.15- acre tract of land out of Section 30, Block 38, T-1-S, T&P RR Co. Survey, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located at the southeast corner of the intersection of East Loop 250 North and North Fairgrounds Road.) (DISTRICT: 2) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

MOTION APPROVING WITH STAFF'S.

RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF OF PRELIMINARY PLAT OF RUCKUS EDITION SECTION THREE BEING A REPL OF LOT ONE BLOCK, ONE RUCKUS EDITION AND A 70.15 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF SECTION 30 BLOCK 38 T ONE ST AND P RAILROAD COMMISSION SURVEY CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF EAST LOOP TWO 50 NORTH AND NORTH FAIRGROUNDS ROAD.

THANK YOU CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS.

BRITT MARY SENIOR PLANNER VISIT ITEM 23.

ITEM 23 ON THE AGENDA AS A PRELIMINARY PLAT SUSPENDED BY PARK HILL ON BEHALF OF LONE STAR SANCTUARY FOR ANIMALS AND JACK AND DOLORES MCCAW FOUNDATION FOR FUTURE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON A PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH FAIRGROUNDS ROAD, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO PLOT 111.69 ACRES INTO NINE LOTS.

PROPERTY IS HAS CURRENTLY HAS MULTIPLE ZONINGS SUCH AS MF 16 REGIONAL RETAIL SF THREE AND PD FOR HOUSE AND DEVELOPMENT.

A PD FOR SHOPPING CENTER SURROUNDING ZONING TO THE NORTH IS A PD FOR A SHOPPING CENTER.

SURROUNDINGS ZONE TO THE SOUTH IS SF TWO TO THE WEST SF ONE AND THE ZONING TO THE EAST CONSISTS OF SF TWO AND A PD FOR A HOUSE DEVELOPMENT AND A SHOPPING CENTER.

CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY IS VACANT LAND IN AN ANIMAL SHELTER SURROUNDING LAND USE TO THE NORTH IS LOOP TWO 50 NORTH TO THE WEST IS A GOLF COURSE TO THE SOUTH AND EAST IS VACANT LAND THAT PROPOSED USES FOR A NEW COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT.

THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATES THIS LOCATION AS URBAN, MEDIUM, URBAN LOW AND EMPLOYMENT RESERVE SUPPORTING USES INCLUDE A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USES.

THIS REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE WITH TALL CITY TOMORROW.

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN ADDITION TO THE PLAT, THE PROPERTY'S ALSO IN THE PROCESS OF BEING REZONED ZONE CHANGE REQUEST IS SCHEDULED FOR THE MARCH 24TH CITY COUNCIL MEETING.

THE PLA WILL ALSO NEED TO GO TO HAVE CITY COUNCIL'S APPROVAL AS IT EXCEEDS 25 ACRES.

THIS ITEM'S ALSO SCHEDULED FOR THE MARCH 24TH CITY COUNCIL MEETING.

STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS.

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.

DOES GO AHEAD.

I WAS GONNA SAY, SO THE ZONE CHANGE CLERK, SO THE ZONE CHANGE HAS TO GO UP TO THE CITY COUNCIL, CORRECT? YES SIR.

THIS WALL, THIS PLOT WILL ALSO GO 'CAUSE IT EXCEEDS 25 ACRES.

YES SIR.

YEAH.

ALRIGHT.

DOES, DOES THE CITY SEE ANY ISSUES WITH HOW THIS IS GONNA BE DEVELOPED CONSIDERING THAT THE HIGH SCHOOL IS GONNA BE JUST TO THE SOUTH ESSENTIALLY? NO SIR.

WE DIDN'T HAVE ANY ISSUES WITH IT FROM ANY DEPARTMENTS.

OKAY.

UH, ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU BRETT.

THANK YOU.

DO I HEAR ANY MOTIONS? I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE.

I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE FROM COMMISSIONER OFIELD.

SECOND.

SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER MARTIN.

IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? NO SIR.

IF NOT, LET'S VOTE.

MOTION PASSED.

SIX TO ZERO.

THANK YOU.

ITEM NUMBER 24.

[24. - Motion approving, with staff's recommended conditions, a Preliminary Plat of Northwestern Addition, Section 21, being a plat of a 3.77-acre tract of land out of Section 5, Block X, H.P. Hilliard Survey, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located on the north side of Cardinal Lane, approximately 2,200 feet west of North Midkiff Road.) (DISTRICT: 1) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

MOTION APPROVING WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS.

CONDITIONS A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF NORTHWESTERN EDITION SECTION 21 BEING A PLAT OF A 3.77 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF SECTION FIVE BLOCK XHP HILLIARD SURVEY CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CARDINAL LANE APPROXIMATELY 2,200 FEET WEST OF NORTH MIDKIFF ROAD.

GOOD AFTERNOON CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONER, MAD MAAS PLANNER TO PRESENT.

ITEM 24.

ITEM 24 ON THE AGENDA AS A PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBMITTED BY MAVERICK ENGINEERING FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 37 0 8 CARDINAL LANE.

IN

[01:00:01]

ORDER TO MEET THE CITY'S SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO PLOT ZERO LOTS INTO ONE LOT.

THE PROPERTY IS ZONED AE AGRICULTURAL STATE DISTRICT AND THE SURROUNDING ZONING IS ALSO AE.

THE CURRENT USE IS SINGLE FAMILY AND THE SURROUNDING USES ARE SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING AND VACANT LAND TO THE WEST.

THE LAND USE DESIGNATION IS URBAN RESIDENTIAL LARGE LOT WHICH SUPPORTS SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING AND OPEN SPACE.

THE REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE TALL CITY TOMORROW.

PLAN AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS.

THANK YOU.

AND I'M OPEN FOR ANY QUESTIONS.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? THANK YOU MADAM.

DO I HEAR ANY MOTIONS? MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.

I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER CIGA.

I'LL SECOND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER GARZA.

ANY DISCUSSION? ALRIGHT, LET'S VOTE.

MOTION PASSED.

SIX TO ZERO.

THANK YOU.

ITEM NUMBER 25,

[25. - Motion approving, with staff's recommended conditions, a Preliminary Plat of Dahlia Industrial Park, Section 2, being a replat of Lots 19 and 20, Block 2, Dahlia Industrial Park, Midland County, Texas. (Generally located at the southwest corner of the intersection of West County Road 140 and North County Road 1283.) (EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY 26. OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

MOTION APPROVING WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS.

A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF A DALIA INDUSTRIAL PARKS SECTION TWO BEING A RE PLAT OF LOTS.

19 AND 20 BLOCK TWO.

DAHLIA INDUSTRIAL PARK, MIDLAND COUNTY, TEXAS GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF WEST COUNTY ROAD ONE 40 AND NORTH COUNTY ROAD 1283.

GOOD AFTERNOON, CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS.

MADELEINE HAWKES PLANNER TO PRESENT.

ITEM 25.

ITEM 25 ON THE AGENDAS.

A PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTED BY SIERRA LAND SURVEYING FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1 0 9 0 1 AND 1 0 9 1 1 WEST COUNTY ROAD 47 FOR THE SUBDIVISION OF THE PROPERTY FOR TRANS AND ENTITLEMENTS.

THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO PLANT THREE LOTS INTO FOUR LOTS.

THE CURRENT USES VACANT LAND WITH INDUSTRIAL USES TO THE NORTH, SOUTH AND WEST AND VACANT LAND TO THE EAST.

THE LAND USE IS NOT DESIGNATED BY THE TULSA CITY TOMORROW.

PLAN, SINCE THE PRELIMINARY EXCEEDS UH, 25 ACRES, IT MUST HAVE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL.

THE PRELIMINARY PLAN IS SCHEDULED FOR THE MARCH 24TH, 2026 CITY COUNCIL MEETING.

STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS.

THANK YOU.

AND I'M OPEN FOR ANY QUESTIONS.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU MADLY.

THANK YOU.

ANY MOTIONS? I MOVE TO APPROVE.

ALL RIGHT, I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE FROM COMMISSIONER MARTIN.

I'LL SECOND AND A SECOND.

I'M SORRY FOR COMMISSIONER LAVOY.

LAVOY LAVOY FROM A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER LAVOY.

IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL RIGHT, LET'S VOTE.

MOTION PASSED SIX TO ZERO.

OUR FINAL ITEM IS ITEM NUMBER

[26. - Motion approving, with staff's recommended conditions, a Preliminary Plat of Seraра Addition, Section 2, being a plat of a 48.80-acre tract of land out of Section 47, Block 38, T-1-S, T&P RR Co. Survey, Midland County, Texas. (Generally located at the southeast corner of the intersection of East County Road 95 and South County Road 1130.) (EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

26, MOTION APPROVING WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS.

A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SARPA.

ADDITION SECTION TWO BEING A PLAT OF A 48.8 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF SECTION 47 BLOCK 38 T ONE STNP RAILROAD COMMISSION SURVEY MIDLAND COUNTY, TEXAS GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF EAST COUNTY ROAD 95 AND SOUTH COUNTY ROAD 1130.

THANK YOU CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS ANGELINA TINI TO PRESENT.

ITEM 26.

ITEM 26 ON THE AGENDA IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SARPA EDITION SUBMITTED BY MAVERICK ENGINEERING.

UM, WE ARE PLANNING FOR FUTURE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH OFFICE SPACE.

IT IS A 48.80 ACRE, UH, AT TRACT LAND AND WE WANT TO PROPOSE UH, 22 LOTS.

CURRENT USE IS VACANT WITH SURROUNDING USES TO THE NORTH AND WEST SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING TO THE EAST OF SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING AND VACANT LAND TO THE SOUTH IS VACANT LAND WITH A PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL USE AND THE TALL CITY TOMORROW.

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOES NOT DESIGNATE THIS AREA AS IT IS IN THE ETGA.

SINCE THE PLAT IS OVER 25 ACRES, IT WILL NEED TO GO TO CITY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL AND IT IS SCHEDULED FOR THE MARCH 24TH, 2026.

CITY COUNCIL MEETING.

STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS.

THANK YOU.

AND I'M OPEN FOR QUESTIONS.

ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU ANGELINE.

THANK YOU.

[01:05:01]

ALRIGHT, DO I HAVE ANY MOTIONS? I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE.

I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE REQUEST FROM COMMISSIONER OFIELD.

SECOND.

CAN I HAVE A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER CIGA? ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THE MATTER? ALRIGHT, LET'S VOTE.

MOTION PASSED.

SIX TO ZERO.

THANK YOU.

THAT CONCLUDES OUR AGENDA.

IT IS FOUR THIRTY SIX AND I WILL CALL OUR MEETING TO ADJOURN.

THANK YOU.