4. - Hold a public hearing and consider a request by Carmen Lopez, for a Specific Use Designation with Term for the sale of all Alcoholic Beverages for on-premises consumption, in a bar, for Lot 2, 3, 4 and the east 9 feet of Lot 5, Block 8, replat of Loma Linda Addition, City and County of Midland, Texas (Generally located at the north side of East Scharbauer Drive, approximately 85 feet west of North Lamesa Road.) (DISTRICT: 2) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)

[4. - Hold a public hearing and consider a request by Carmen Lopez, for a Specific Use Designation with Term for the sale of all Alcoholic Beverages for on-premises consumption, in a bar, for Lot 2, 3, 4 and the east 9 feet of Lot 5, Block 8, replat of Loma Linda Addition, City and County of Midland, Texas (Generally located at the north side of East Scharbauer Drive, approximately 85 feet west of North Lamesa Road.) (DISTRICT: 2) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

HEARINGS. OUR PROCEDURE FOR CONDUCTING THESE PUBLIC HEARINGS IS AS FOLLOWS. FIRST, THE STAFF WILL PRESENT ITS EVALUATION OF THE REQUEST. THE APPLICANT WILL PRESENT AND REQUEST THE REQUEST AND RESPOND TO ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.

NEXT, THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE REQUEST WILL ADDRESS THE COMMISSION. THEN THOSE WHO ARE ARE OPPOSED TO THE REQUEST OR WHO WISH ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL ADDRESS THE COMMISSION. THE APPLICANT WILL THEN HAVE A FINAL OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS ANY OF THE REMARKS FROM THE PUBLIC. THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL THEN BE CLOSED. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC WILL BE HEARD ONLY IF A MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION DESIRES TO DIRECT A QUESTION, EITHER TO THE APPLICANT OR A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC. FINALLY, THE COMMISSION WILL CONSIDER ALL OF THE INFORMATION PRESENTED AND VOTE ON THE MATTER. TODAY'S FIRST PUBLIC HEARING IS ITEM NUMBER FOUR. HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST BY CARMEN LOPEZ FOR A SPECIFIC USE DESIGNATION WITH. TERM FOR THE SALE OF ALL ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES FOR ON PREMISES CONSUMPTION IN A BAR FOR LOT TWO, THREE, FOUR AND THE EAST NINE FEET OF LOT FIVE, BLOCK EIGHT REPLAT LOMA LINDA. ADDITION. CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST NORTH SIDE OF EAST SCARBOROUGH DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 85FT WEST OF NORTH LAMESA ROAD. THANK YOU COMMISSIONERS. MY NAME. IS ALEXIS. ITEM NUMBER FOUR FOR RUDY SPORTS BAR. THIS IS THE PROPERTY OWNER AND APPLICANT IS MISS CARMEN LOPEZ. IT'S ON FOUR NINE EAST SCARBOROUGH FOR THE SALE OF ALCOHOL. IT IS FOR AN EXISTING BUSINESS. THE AREA OF THE BUSINESS IS 7773FT■S. THE SERVICEABLE AREA IS 6568FT■S.

THE HOURS OF OPERATION AND THE PROPOSED HOURS OF ALCOHOL SALE IS MONDAY THROUGH SUNDAY FROM 4 TO 2 A.M. THE CURRENT ZONING IS REGIONAL RETAIL. THE SURROUNDING ZONINGS TO THE NORTH, SOUTH AND WEST ARE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING HOMES. TO THE EAST IS REGIONAL RETAILS.

THE CURRENT USE IS A BAR. THE PROPOSED USE WILL REMAIN A BAR. THE SURROUNDING USES TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH ARE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. TO THE EAST IS A WATER KIOSK VACANT AND THEN THE WEST IS COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS. THIS IS A LOOK ON EAST SCARBOROUGH. IT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE TALL CITY PLAN. THERE IS NO CHURCHES, SCHOOLS AROUND IT WITHIN 300FT. WE HAVEN'T RECEIVED ANY OBJECTIONS AND THAT'S MY FAULT. STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST WITH THE STANDARD SUD CONDITIONS, AND I'M OPEN TO ANY QUESTIONS. ANYTHING. ALL RIGHT.

[00:05:06]

THANK YOU ALEXIS. OPENING UP THE PUBLIC HEARING. IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT. WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK ON THE MATTER OR JUST DEFER TO STAFF? YES. JUST DEFER TO STAFF. OKAY. THANK YOU.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS REQUEST? SEEING NONE, IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO IS OPPOSED OR WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION? ALL RIGHT. THEN WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND WE WILL GO TO THE COMMISSION FOR ANY MOTIONS. MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. ALL RIGHT. I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THIS REQUEST FROM COMMISSIONER SISNIEGA AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL RIGHT, LET'S VOTE. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY BY MARKUS SCHWARTZ ON BEHALF OF RMLS HOPP TXLLC FOR SPECIFIC

[5. - Hold a public hearing and consider a request by Marcus Schwartz, on behalf of RMLS HopTX, LLC, for a Specific Use Designation with Term for the sale of all Alcoholic Beverages for on-premises consumption, in a restaurant, on Lot 3A, Block 62, Belmont Addition, Section 13, City and County of Midland, Texas (Generally located north of East Interstate 20, approximately 390 feet east of South Baird Street.) (DISTRICT: 2) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

USE DESIGNATION WITH TERM FOR THE SALE OF ALL ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES FOR ON PREMISES CONSUMPTION IN A RESTAURANT ON LOT THREE, A BLOCK 62 BELMONT EDITION, SECTION 13, CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF EAST INTERSTATE 20, APPROXIMATELY 390FT EAST OF SOUTH BEARD STREET. THANK YOU, CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS. ALEXIS, TO PRESENT ITEM NUMBER FIVE. THIS IS ANOTHER STUDY FOR A CONCEPT IHOP AND APPLEBEE'S. TOGETHER.

THE APPLICANT IS RMLS AND THE PROPERTY OWNER LRMLS. TEXAS REPRESENTATIVE IS MARCUS SCHWARTZ. LOCATION IS 301 EAST, INTERSTATE 20. IT IS. FOR A NEW RESTAURANT, THE AREA OF THE BUSINESS WILL BE 3725FT■S. THE SERVICE AREA WILL BE 22 2023, 223FT■S. THE HOURS OF OPERATION WILL BE 247. IT IS A. THE PROPOSED ALCOHOL HOURS WILL BE MONDAY THROUGH SATURDAY FROM 7 A.M. TO 2 A.M. AND SUNDAY FROM 10 A.M. TO 2 A.M. THE CURRENT ZONING IS BPI20 BUSINESS PARK SURROUNDING ZONING NORTH AND WEST IS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR OFFICE AND RETAIL DEVELOPMENT.

SOUTH AND EAST IS BUSINESS I 20 THE CURRENT SPACE USE RIGHT NOW IS VACANT SURROUNDING USES TO THE SOUTH AND EAST IS BUSINESS PARK TO THE WEST IS P D PLAN DISTRICT AND THE PROPOSED USE IS FOR A RESTAURANT AND IT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE CITY PLAN. THERE IS NO CHURCHES OR SCHOOLS WITHIN THE 300FT. NO OBJECTIONS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED. THEREFORE, WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF. WITH THE STANDARD CONDITIONS. THANK YOU AND I'M OPEN TO ANY QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF AT THIS TIME. OKAY. THANK YOU. OPENING UP THE PUBLIC HEARING. IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? WOULD YOU LIKE TO COME SPEAK ON THE MATTER? SURE. IF YOU DON'T MIND GIVING US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR. MY NAME IS CATHERINE CHAMBLEE. I'M ACTUALLY HERE IN LIEU OF MARCUS SCHWARTZ, 511 WEST SEVENTH STREET IN AUSTIN, TEXAS. I'M HERE REPRESENTING ROMMEL, OUR MLS HOP TEXAS LLC, AS WELL AS THE APPLICANT, OUR MLS AT BEVCO LLC. I THINK EVERYONE IS PROBABLY FAMILIAR WITH THE APPLEBEE'S CONCEPT. THIS WILL JUST BE A DUAL CONCEPT HALF IHOP, HALF APPLEBEE'S. AND SO THE NEED FOR THE ALCOHOL FOR ON PREMISE CONSUMPTION, MIXED BEVERAGES FROM MIXED BEVERAGE SALES. BASICALLY, THIS IS JUST TO ENHANCE THE AN ALREADY ROBUST MENU THE APPLEBEE'S OFFERS AS WELL AS IHOP. IT'S EXPECTED THAT THE ALCOHOL PERCENTAGE VERSUS GROSS WILL BE LESS THAN 20%. SO THIS ISN'T A BAR, YOU KNOW, IT'S NOT A BAR OR MAJOR ALCOHOL SALES. THIS IS EXPECTED TO BE 20%, AGAIN, 20% OR LESS FOR THE GROSS SALES FOR THE ALCOHOL. I WANTED TO SAY WE APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK HERE TODAY. THERE'S ALSO TWO OPERATIONAL MEMBERS OF THE COMPANY THAT ARE HERE AND PRESENT. SHOULD Y'ALL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FROM AN OPERATIONAL STANDPOINT. THANK YOU AGAIN SO MUCH FOR YOUR TIME. ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. I HAVE A DENISE WHITEHEAD WHO WOULD LIKE TO COME SPEAK IN FAVOR. DO YOU WANT TO COME SPEAK OR. I'M SORRY. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. I'LL HOLD THIS HERE. SAME THING WITH

[00:10:06]

MR. ETHAN WHITEHEAD. OKAY. I WILL DO THAT. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD ELSE WOULD WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS REQUEST? ALL RIGHT. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO IS OPPOSED TO THIS REQUEST OR WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION? SEEING NONE, I'LL TAKE THIS AS A CHANCE FOR US TO GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND WE'LL GO TO THE COMMISSION, MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE REQUEST FROM COMMISSIONER SISNIEGA AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER MARTIN. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? OKAY. LET'S VOTE. MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU. ITEM NUMBER SIX. HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND

[6. - Hold a public hearing and consider a request by Jorge Ramos, on behalf of Manuel Herrera for a Specific Use Designation with Term for the sale of all alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption, in a restaurant on Lot 2, Block 6, Claydesta Plaza, Section 5, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Desta Drive and West Wadley Avenue.) (DISTRICT: 3) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

CONSIDER A REQUEST BY JORGE RAMOS ON BEHALF OF MANUEL HERRERA FOR A SPECIFIC USE DESIGNATION WITH TERM FOR THE SALE OF ALL ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES FOR ON PREMISES CONSUMPTION IN A RESTAURANT ON LOT TWO, BLOCK SIX CLAY DESTA PLAZA, SECTION FIVE, CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF DESTA DRIVE AND WEST WADLEY AVENUE. THANK YOU, CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS. MY NAME ALEXIS.

ALEXIS. TO PRESENT ITEM NUMBER SIX FOR YOU GUYS HAVE SEEN THIS ITEM BEFORE. PREVIOUSLY THEY ARE ADDING JUST THE PATIO AREA NOW. NOTHING THAT IT IS ON. 418 WEST WADLEY THE AREA OF THE BUSINESS IS 7633. THE SERVICEABLE AREA WILL BE 5380 WITH THE PATIO AREA NOW, AND THEY ALSO CHANGED ONE HOUR FROM MONDAY TO THURSDAY FROM 11 A.M. TO 11 P.M. THE CURRENT ZONING IS PLANNED. DISTRICT FOR OFFICE AND RETAIL DEVELOPMENT SURROUNDING USES TO THE NORTH AND EAST IS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR OFFICE AND RETAIL. WEST IS PLANNED. DEVELOPMENT FOR TRANSITIONAL DISTRICT SOUTH IS FOR A SHOPPING CENTER. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. THE CURRENT USE IS A RESTAURANT. IT'S AN OPERATING RESTAURANT RIGHT NOW. SURROUNDING USES TO THE NORTH AND EAST IS AN OFFICE USE. TO THE WEST IS RESTAURANT. TO THE SOUTH IS A DRY CLEANING STORE AND SPA. THIS IS A VIEW ON WEST WHATLEY. IT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE CITY PLAN. THERE IS NO CHURCHES OR SCHOOLS WITHIN 300FT. NO OBJECTIONS WERE RECEIVED. SO WE DO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS RECOMMENDATION WITH THE STANDARD CONDITIONS. THANK YOU, AND I'M OPEN TO ANY QUESTIONS. ANYTHING FOR STAFF. THANK YOU ALEXIS. ALL RIGHT. OPENING UP THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT. NOT SEEING THE APPLICANT. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS REQUEST? SEEING NONE. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO IS OPPOSED WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION? OKAY. CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING. WE'LL GO TO THE COMMISSION. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM NUMBER SIX. ALL RIGHT. I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THIS REQUEST FROM COMMISSIONER SISNIEGA. I'LL SECOND. I HAVE A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL RIGHT. LET'S VOTE. MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. ITEM NUMBER SEVEN.

[7. - Hold a public hearing and consider a request by Chase Gardaphe for a Specific Use Designation without Term for a Manufactured Home Park on a 35.05-acre tract of land out of Section 25, Block 39, T-1-S, T&P RR Co Survey, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located on the west side of North Fairgrounds Road, approximately 650 feet north of East Cuthbert Avenue.) (DISTRICT: 2) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST BY CHASE GARDAPHÉ FOR A SPECIFIC USE DESIGNATION WITHOUT TERM FOR A MANUFACTURED HOME PARK ON A 35.5 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF SECTION 25, BLOCK 39T1STP RAILROAD COMMISSION SURVEY. CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF NORTH FAIRGROUNDS ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 650FT NORTH OF EAST CUTHBERT AVENUE. THANK YOU. CHAIRMAN. COMMISSIONERS PLANNING TO PRESENT ITEM NUMBER SEVEN, ITEM NUMBER SEVEN IN THE AGENDA IS A STUDY SUBMITTED BY J.C. GARVEY FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF NORTH FAIRGROUNDS ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 650FT NORTH OF EAST CUTHBERT AVENUE, TO UPDATING 16 EXISTING STUDY. THE TOTAL ACREAGE OF THE PROPERTY IS 35 ACRES, AND IT WOULD INCLUDE ABOUT 263 SPACES BELOW, AND THERE ARE ABOUT. AS YOU CAN SEE, SEVERAL SPACES WITH DIFFERENT. I GUESS THREE, 501, 58 BY 101, 59 BY 112, 56 BY 101, 55, 101. SO IT'S JUST DIFFERENT SPACES. THESE ARE BASICALLY THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A STANDARD CD FOR A MANUFACTURED HOME. AND THIS IS BASICALLY A CHART THAT I CREATED WITH CHATGPT

[00:15:10]

EXPLAINING THE STANDARD CONDITIONS THAT THE CITY CODE REQUIRES FOR A, A CD FOR MANUFACTURED HOME AND THE CURRENT THAT THE CITY HAS FOR THIS PROPERTY AND WHAT THE PROPOSED FOR THE NEW ONE. I KNOW IT'S KIND OF SMALL. I JUST TRY TO FIT IT IN. BUT THERE IS SOME CHANGES THAT ARE OCCURRING ON THE CURRENT SDO GOING BACK. SO BASICALLY WHAT WE'RE CHANGING OR WHAT IS CHANGING IS WHAT THE CURRENT DENSITY FOR THE STUDY HAS IS IT HAS 12 UNITS PER ACREAGE, WHILE THE OTHER ONE THAT WE'RE CURRENTLY CHANGING IS THE PROPOSED IS EIGHT UNITS PER ACREAGE. THERE WERE NOT CHANGING QUITE A LOT. WE'RE STILL REQUIRING THEM TO HAVE THE THE SETBACKS FOR THE PROPERTY. WE'RE ALSO KEEPING THEM. THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE LICENSE. WE'RE ALSO ALLOWING THEM NOT TO HAVE ANY SIDEWALKS, WHICH ALSO THE CURRENT ONE THAT HAS. WE ALSO DIDN'T HAVE THEM THE SIDEWALKS. BUT THERE'S NOT A LOT OF CHANGES, BUT THEY'RE ALSO WE'RE REMOVING WELL, NOT REMOVING, BUT LOWERING THE MAXIMUM OF DENSITIES BECAUSE HE ALSO SOLD KIND OF A LOT OF PROPERTY AS WELL. SO IT'S BEING SMALLER. WE'RE NOT ALLOWING THEM TO CONTINUE THE SAME DENSITY. THE CURRENT ZONING. WE DID HAVE A ZONE CHANGE QUITE A WHILE. YOU GUYS SAW THIS LIKE I BELIEVE LIKE TWO MONTHS AGO, HE WENT FROM MANUFACTURED HOUSING DISTRICT. THE THE SURROUNDING ZONING IS STILL THE SAME UP NORTH AND SOUTH. IT IS COMMERCIAL TO THE EAST. WE HAVE AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY PARK UP TO THE WEST, WHICH IS THE PROPERTY HE SOLD. IT'S PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT FOR A HOUSING DEVELOPMENT. THE CURRENT LAND USE UP IN THE. WELL IT'S CURRENTLY VACANT, BUT UP THE NORTH THERE'S A SENIOR LIVING FACILITY. TO THE SOUTH IS COMMERCIAL. TO THE EAST WE HAVE AN ANIMAL CONTROL SHELTER, WHICH IS THE CITY'S AND ALSO THE MANUFACTURED HOME PARK THAT HE ALSO OWNS. AND TO THE WEST IS THE VACANT PROPERTY THAT HE SOLD TO THE SCHOOL. AND THE PROPOSED USE, OF COURSE, IS THE MANUFACTURED HOME PARK. THIS IS A PHOTO ON NORTH FAIRGROUNDS LOOKING WEST. THE CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATES THIS AREA AS URBAN MEDIUM, WHICH SUPPORTS USES IS A MIXED HOUSING TYPES ALONG WITH COMMERCIAL OFFICE AND SERVICES. THE REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA. SEEING THAT THERE IS A MANUFACTURED HOME PARK TO THE EAST SIDE, WHICH IS THE PARK THAT HE OWNS. AND LIKE I SAID, THIS ALSO HAD A ZONE CHANGE THAT WE DATED.

MARCH 2024, 2026. THERE WERE NO OBJECTIONS RECEIVED. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST WITH THE STANDARD CONDITIONS THAT WE DID ON THE ORDINANCE REQUEST, WHICH IS THE FOLLOWING. AND I'M OPEN TO ANY QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE ANY, SINCE THERE IS A LOT. IT. IT LOOKS LIKE. AND JUST CORRECT ME HERE IF I'M WRONG, THAT WE'VE. THE PREVIOUS STUDY IS JUST BEING UPDATED. YES, RIGHT. THE PREVIOUS STUDY ALLOWED FOR UP TO 600 UNITS ON THE LAND. YES.

BUT NOW WE'RE LIMITING IT TO 200. AND WAS IT 53 OR 63? 663. AND AND THAT'S OKAY. BUT I GUESS DIDN'T KNOW THIS. WE'VE GOT A STANDARD CODE THAT SAYS MAX SEVEN UNITS PER ACRE, BUT EIGHT, WE'RE STILL AT EIGHT UNITS PER ACRE. IF WE WE DO THAT. YES. WHENEVER I DID THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE ACREAGE VERSUS THE SPACES THAT HE IS PROPOSING, IT CAME UP TO LIKE 7.3, SEVEN POINT SOMETHING. SO YOU CANNOT REALLY HAVE LIKE HALF A HOUSE OR HALF A MOBILE HOME IN EIGHT ACRES. SO I JUST ROUND IT OUT THE, THE MOBILE HOME. AND WHENEVER HE CAME TO DO THE MANUFACTURE, THE REASON WHY IT HAD 600 WAS BECAUSE HE WAS PROPOSING TO HAVE, LIKE MANY HOMES ON A SPACE, IT WAS LIKE THREE MINUTE HOMES ON AN ACTUAL SPACE. SO WHATEVER HE WAS PROPOSING PREVIOUSLY, IT WAS THREE MINUTE HOMES. AND THEN THERE WAS A SPACE WHERE, LIKE TOO MANY HOMES. SO WHENEVER THEY DID THE CALCULATIONS, THEY WERE LIKE, IN THIS SECTION, THERE'S GOING TO HAVE THREE SPACES OR THREE MONO MANUFACTURED HOMES FOR EACH SPACE. AND THEN THEY CALCULATED THAT BY THE SPACES. SO THAT'S HOW THEY CAME UP WITH THE 600 MAXIMUM. OKAY. IS THERE IS THERE ANYTHING I JUST BECAUSE I CAN'T NECESSARILY SEE EVERYTHING, IS THERE, IS THERE ANYTHING THAT WE ARE BECOMING LESS STRINGENT UPON BASED ON

[00:20:04]

WHAT WHAT WAS APPROVED PREVIOUSLY? OR IS EVERYTHING SLIGHTLY EITHER THE SAME OR A LITTLE BIT MORE RESTRICTIVE? IT SEEMS LIKE. IT'S MORE OR LESS THE SAME IN A WAY. I WOULD SAY THAT IT IS THE SAME. I THINK THE BIGGEST DIFFERENCE IS THE DENSITY, THAT IT'S SEVEN UNITS PER ACRE AS OPPOSED TO THE PREVIOUS OR SORRY, EIGHT UNITS PER ACRE AS OPPOSED TO THE PREVIOUSLY ALLOWED 12, WHICH IS CLOSER TO THE CODE STANDARD OF GOOD. OKAY, WELL, CITY WATER BE PROVIDED FOR ALL OF THESE. THAT IS A STANDARD FOR MANUFACTURED HOMES. THEY HAVE TO BE CONNECTED TO CITY WATER. SO RIGHT NOW IT'S ABOUT 7.5, WHICH IS ABOUT EIGHT UNITS PER ACRE.

AND ACCORDING TO THE CODE YOU SAID IT'S. YEAH. SO SO I GUESS THE CITY WILL APPROVE A VARIANCE OR WAIVER TO. SO THESE ARE THE REQUIREMENTS FOR. THE MAXIMUM IS ALLOWED IS FOR LIKE SEVEN. THEY HAVE TO BE CONNECTED TO CITY WATER. TO SEWER TO GAS. AND THEY HAVE.

BUT BASICALLY YES, THE SEWER, GAS, ELECTRICITY SHOULD BE PROVIDED AND SHOULD BE REQUIRED BY THE CITY'S CODE. SO NO SEPTIC TANKS, NO, NO SEPTIC TANKS. OKAY. OR ELSE THEY WON'T GET A SEAL FOR THE CITY. OKAY. SO THE HOMES ARE LIKE 3500. YOU SAID. WHAT WAS THAT AGAIN? THE HOMES ARE LIKE 3500. IS THAT THE LIVING AREA OR THE LOT? THE MEASUREMENTS FOR THE. LET ME GO BACK. I THINK IT WAS THERE. YES. YES. OKAY. 3500. THE SPACE ITSELF. YEAH. OH OKAY. THE LOT.

SO THEN THE HOMES WILL BE LESS. THE BUILDING'S SIZE 3500FT■S. WELL THAT'S, THAT'S THE MINIMUM FOR THE LOT THAT THEY CAN PUT THE HOME ON. BUT ALL OF THE LOTS ARE GREATER THAN 40FT NARROW AND 80FT ON THE LENGTH. THEY WERE ALL BIGGER THAN THOSE. WHAT'S THE STORAGE REQUIREMENT? THAT'S NO LONGER WE'RE NOT. IT'S BASICALLY LIKE A SHED THAT THAT THEY'RE PROVIDING FOR THE.

I GUESS, OCCUPANT OF THAT. IS THIS IS GOING TO HAVE LIKE A, A PARK AREA OR ANYTHING IT'S REQUIRED. AND IT ALSO IS IN THE CONDITIONS THAT THEY HAVE TO KEEP IT MAINTAINED AND. YEAH, THE LANDSCAPING SHALL CONFORM TO REGULATIONS SET FORTH BY TITLE CHAPTER. CAN YOU CLARIFY IF PARK IS REQUIRED OR IF THIS IS JUST THE LANDSCAPING? THEY ARE. I BELIEVE THEY ALSO IN THE SITE PLAN, THEY SHOW IT AS WELL. OH, I CAN I SEE IT, IT'S THE LANDSCAPING, THE RECREATION AREAS. TOTALLY. NO LESS THAN 8% OF THE TOTAL PARK AREA ARE REQUIRED OF THE TOTAL PARK AREA.

SO I GUESS YES, THERE'S A PARK AREA. OKAY. IS THAT THE PARK AREA OR IS THAT THE LIKE FOR THE MANUFACTURED HOME AREA? THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION. I THE WAY I READ IT, WHEN I SAY THE PARK AREA, I THINK THAT'S THE MOBILE HOME PARK. YEAH. CORRECT. SO 8% OF THE TOTAL OF THE WHOLE

[00:25:07]

PARK AREA, AT LEAST 8% NEEDS TO BE LANDSCAPED AND, AND HAVE A PARK. I DON'T THINK THAT NECESSARILY MEANS THEY HAVE TO HAVE A, A PLAYGROUND KIND OF THING, BUT A PARK SPACE, RECREATIONAL SPACE. AND I KNOW IN THE PREVIOUS SITE PLAN FOR THE CURRENT THAT THEY, I KNOW THAT THE CURRENT ONE THAT THEY ARE REPLACING, THEY HAD A SITE PLAN WHERE THEY WERE GOING TO PLAN TO PUT FOOD TRUCKS IN A PLAYGROUND. SO IF THEY'RE CARRYING THAT OVER TO THE NEW ONE, IT INCLUDES IT. ARE THEY CARRYING IT OVER TO THE NEW ONE? THEY ADDED IT BECAUSE, I MEAN, I GUESS IF IT'S NOT ON THEIR NEW ONE, THEN IT'S NOT NECESSARILY THEIR I DON'T SEE I YEAH. IT'S JUST A SITE PLAN DOESN'T SHOW THAT. UNLESS IS THAT, IS THAT WHAT'S OVER IN THE BOTTOM RIGHT CORNER? I GUESS THE THE SOUTHEAST CORNER LOOKS LIKE IT LOOKS LIKE DRAINAGE, BUT I GUESS SOMETIMES THEY DO THAT AS A PARK. EITHER WAY, I'M NOT SEEING ANYTHING THAT LOOKS LIKE IT'S IT'S LABELED PARK OR RECREATION SPACE. I GUESS THAT IS NOT PRESENT. YEAH. I'M. I DON'T THINK THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT UNLESS A REPRESENTATIVE IS HERE.

REPRESENTATIVE. I THINK I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT SINCE IT'S NOT CLEARLY SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN, AND THE SITE PLAN IS PART OF WHAT IS ADOPTED WITH THE ORDINANCE, I, I WOULD RECOMMEND JUST DEFERRING IT SO THAT WE CAN MAKE SURE THAT IT'S CLEAR WHAT'S BEING PROVIDED. ALL RIGHT. WE'LL MAKE NOTE OF THAT AT THIS AT THIS POINT. IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE FOR FOR STAFF BEFORE I GO AHEAD AND OPEN IT UP FOR PUBLIC COMMENT? OKAY. THANK YOU. APPRECIATE YOU BEATRICE. ALL RIGHT. THEN I WILL GO AHEAD AND OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ASK, IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? I DON'T SEE THE APPLICANT. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS REQUEST? SEEING NONE, IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO IS OPPOSED OR WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION? OKAY, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND I'LL GO TO THE COMMISSION. IF IT'S BEEN RECOMMENDED BY BY STAFF THAT WE PROBABLY GO AHEAD AND DEFER THIS. DOES ANYONE WANT TO GO AHEAD THAT MAKE THAT MOTION? OKAY. I'LL SECOND. ALL RIGHT. I HAVE A MOTION TO DEFER THIS ITEM UNTIL. DO WE NEED TO STATE TO A CERTAIN DATE OR JUST TILL THE NEXT MEETING? I, I CAN'T REMEMBER WITH A DEFERRAL OR IF YOU CAN LEAVE IT OPEN ONLY BECAUSE WE WANT TO MAKE SURE WE MEET THE NOTICE PROCESS. WE'LL DO OUR BEST TO GET IT ON THE NEXT MEETING, BUT I WANT TO MAKE SURE WE MEET THAT NOTICE. WE'LL JUST GO AHEAD AND LEAVE IT OPEN ENDED. THE MOTION HAS BEEN MADE BY TO DEFER THE ITEM BY COMMISSIONER BARRY, AND THE SECOND WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER LAFOY. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? OKAY. WE'LL GO AHEAD AND VOTE ON THE DEFERRAL. DISAPPEARED.

MOTION PASSES TO DEFER UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. ITEM NUMBER EIGHT, HOLD

[8. - Hold a public hearing and consider a request by SEER Land Surveying, on behalf of Drew & Michelle Harris, Robert & Sharon Floyd, Carroll & Barbara Grafa, and Robert Davenport, for a Zone Change from PD, Planned Development District for a Housing Development to an amended PD, Planned Development District for a Housing District on Lots 27, 28, 31, and 32, Block 1B, Racquet Club South, Section 3, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located on the north side of Racquet Club Drive, approximately 350 feet west of North L Street.) (DISTRICT: 3) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST BY SEAR LAND SURVEYING ON BEHALF OF DREW AND MICHELLE HARRIS, ROBERT AND SHANNON, FLOYD CARROLL AND BARBARA GRAF AND ROBERT DAVENPORT FOR A ZONE

[00:30:06]

CHANGE FROM PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR A HOUSING DEVELOPMENT TO AN AMENDED PD PLAN. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR HOUSING DISTRICT ON LOTS 27, 28, 31 AND 32.

BLOCK ONE B RACKET CLUB SOUTH, SECTION THREE CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF RACKET CLUB DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 350FT WEST OF NORTH L STREET. THANK YOU. CHAIRMAN. COMMISSIONERS PLANNING TO PRESENT ITEM NUMBER EIGHT, ITEM NUMBER EIGHT. AND THE AGENDA IS THE ZONING CHANGE SUBMITTED BY SIERRA LAND SURVEYING FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 27, 57, 27, 59, 28, OH 52809 RACKET CLUB TO AMEND THE CURRENT SITE PLAN OF THE PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT TO REFLECT CHANGES TO THE PROPERTIES. THE CURRENT ZONING IS PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT.

SURROUNDING USES INCLUDE SF ONE AND PD FOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT. THE PROPOSED ZONING WILL REMAIN.

PD HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FOR. FOR A HOUSING DEVELOPMENT. THE CURRENT USE IS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH RESIDENTIAL USES SURROUNDING IT. HERE'S THE SITE PHOTO ON RACKET CLUB DRIVE. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATES THIS AREA AS URBAN RESIDENTIAL LOW, WHICH SUPPORTS RESTRICTIVE LAND USE, EMPHASIZING ON SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED. THE PRELIMINARY PLAT WAS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ON MAY 4TH, 2026. NO OBJECTION WAS RECEIVED. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. I'M OPEN TO ANY QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE ANY. IF YOU WOULDN'T MIND JUST LAYING OUT THE CHANGES THAT FROM WHAT WE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED TO WHAT'S COMING BEFORE US TODAY. SO BASICALLY IT'S A PD, SO IT HAS TO HAVE AN ATTACHED SITE PLAN BECAUSE THE SITE PLAN, IT'S VERY, VERY OLD. THEY ARE JUST BASICALLY REVISING IT. MADELINE PRESENTED THE PRELIMINARY PLAT, I BELIEVE IN MY MAY 4TH. THEY'RE JUST COMBINING TWO LOTS, MAKING IT ONE, AND THEY'RE REVISING THE OTHER TWO LOTS TO FIX THE LOT LINES. OKAY, THAT'S ALL SO AND SO NOTHING'S CHANGED BETWEEN THERE. THIS IS JUST PROCEDURAL, IF YOU WILL. YES, BASICALLY. OKAY. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. THANK YOU. OPENING UP THE PUBLIC HEARING. IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? I HAVE ARE YOU MR. WHELAN. WOULD YOU LIKE TO COME SPEAK ON THIS? NOT REALLY, BUT OKAY. WE WOULD APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU. I JUST. MARK WHELAN 1102. WEST TEXAS. I JUST CAME IN CASE THERE WERE ANY QUESTIONS. OBVIOUSLY, IT'S A PROCEDURAL THING, AND I REALLY WANTED TO SEE IF I COULD MAKE IT TO THE FRONT PAGE OF THE MIDLAND REPORTER TELEGRAM TWO TIMES IN A ROW. THIS IS VERY EMBARRASSING. I'M SORRY I'M EVEN HERE. NO QUESTIONS. I'LL GO SIT DOWN. ALL RIGHT. ANY QUESTIONS FOR OUR APPLICATION? IT'S IT REALLY IS JUST STRAIGHTENING OUT SOME LOTS SO WE CAN DO SOME THINGS HERE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. APPRECIATE IT. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS REQUEST? SEEING NONE, IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO IS OPPOSED OR WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION? ALL RIGHT. I'LL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND WE'LL GO TO THE COMMISSION, MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE REQUEST FROM COMMISSIONER SISNIEGA. AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER MARTIN. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THE MATTER? OKAY. LET'S VOTE. MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU. APPRECIATE YOUR TIME.

[9. - Hold a public hearing and consider a request for a Final Plat of Pavilion Park Addition, Section 16, being a replat of the unrecorded plat of Pavilion Park Addition, Section 15, being a replat of a 90.60-acre tract of land out of Lot 8, Block 2, Pavilion Park Addition, Section 7, and a 10.00-acre tract of land out of Section 1, Block X, H.P. Hilliard Survey, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located on the north side of Solomon Lane, approximately 1,155 feet west of North Fairgrounds Road.) (DISTRICT: 1) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

ITEM NUMBER NINE, HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR A FINAL PLAT OF PAVILION PARK ADDITION SECTION ONE. SECTION 16 RATHER BEING A REPLAT OF THE UNRECORDED PLAT OF PAVILION PARK. ADDITION. SECTION 15 BEING A REPLAT OF A 90.6 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF LOT EIGHT, BLOCK TWO, PAVILION PARK ADDITION SECTION SEVEN AND A TEN ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF SECTION ONE, BLOCK XHP HILLIARD. SURVEY. CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SOLOMON LANE, APPROXIMATELY 1155FT WEST OF NORTH FAIRGROUNDS ROAD. GOOD AFTERNOON, CHAIRMAN, COMMISSIONERS. ANGELINA BASSANINI, PLANNER. TO PRESENT ITEM NUMBER NINE. ITEM NUMBER NINE IS A FINAL PLAT OF PAVILION PARK ADDITION SECTION 16, AND IT MAY LOOK FAMILIAR. YOU SAW SECTION 15 NOT TOO LONG AGO. WE DID APPROVE IT WITH CONDITIONS. AND AS WE WERE WORKING THROUGH THOSE CONDITIONS, A FEW THINGS HAD CHANGED JUST A LITTLE BIT. SO WE NEEDED TO GO BACK AND FIX IT.

THAT'S WHY IT'S COMING BACK AS SECTION 16, BECAUSE 15 WAS APPROVED BUT WAS AN UNRECORDED,

[00:35:01]

AND THE PLAT IS GOING TO BE AT 100.60 ACRES. THE ACREAGE DID NOT CHANGE. STILL, THE 149 PROPOSED LOTS. CURRENT ZONING IS SF TWO AND SOME AGRICULTURAL ESTATE OFF THE SIDE. THERE. THE SURROUNDING ZONING TO THE NORTH IS SF THREE TWO F AND TOWNHOME TO THE SOUTH IS GOING TO BE SF THREE AND A E TO THE EAST IS AGRICULTURAL ESTATE AND TO THE WEST IS A PD FOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT. THE LAND USE IS CURRENTLY VACANT LAND WITH SURROUNDING USES TO THE NORTH AND WEST OF SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING AND TO THE SOUTH AND EAST OF VACANT LAND, WITH A PROPOSED USE OF SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING. HERE'S A PHOTO OF THE PROPERTY ON FAIRGROUNDS ROAD LOOKING WEST. THE LAND. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOES DESIGNATE THIS AS URBAN RESIDENTIAL LOW, SO THIS REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE WITH OUR TALL CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. A ZONE CHANGE WAS ORIGINALLY APPROVED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN 2024. NO OBJECTIONS WERE RECEIVED AND STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT OF SECTION 16 AND SECTION 15 WAS APPROVED ON MARCH 16TH, AND WE DO HAVE ONE CONDITION JUST FOR SOME SOME ROADWAYS.

THANK YOU. I'M OPEN FOR ANY QUESTIONS. ANYTHING FOR STAFF. THANK YOU. ANGELINA. OPENING UP THE PUBLIC HEARING. IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? I DON'T SEE THE APPLICANT. OH. WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK ON THE MATTER OR DEFER TO STAFF? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS REQUEST? ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE, IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO IS OPPOSED OR WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION? OKAY. I WILL CLOSE OUR PUBLIC HEARING. WE WILL GO TO THE COMMISSION MOTION TO APPROVE. I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THIS REQUEST FROM COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON. SECOND AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER SISNIEGA. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THE MATTER? ALL RIGHT. LET'S GO AHEAD AND VOTE. THANK YOU.

FIRST, MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU. THAT CONCLUDES TODAY'S PUBLIC

[10. - Motion approving a reinstatement of an approved Preliminary Plat of The Vineyard Addition, Section 13 West, being a 309.21-acre tract of land out of the west half of Section 13, Block 40, T-1-S, T&P RR Co. Survey, Midland County, Texas. (Generally located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Mockingbird Lane and Avalon Drive.) (EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION), (DISTRICT: 4) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

HEARINGS. NEXT, WE WILL MOVE ON TO OUR MISCELLANEOUS SECTION, ITEM NUMBER TEN. MOTION APPROVING A REINSTATEMENT OF AN APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE VINEYARD ADDITION, SECTION 13 WEST BEING A 309.21 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF THE WEST HALF OF SECTION 13, BLOCK 40T1S, T AND P RAILROAD COMMISSION SURVEY, MIDLAND COUNTY, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF MOCKINGBIRD LANE AND AVALON DRIVE. THANK YOU. CHAIRMAN COMMISSIONERS PLANNER LAURIE ELLIOTT TO PRESENT ITEM TEN ON BEHALF OF BRETT MURRAY. ITEM TEN ON THE AGENDA IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT REINSTATEMENT SUBMITTED BY WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ON BEHALF OF THE VINEYARD RESERVE, LLC FOR FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ON A PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF MOCKINGBIRD LANE. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO PLAT EXCUSE ME, AT 309.24 ACRES INTO 547 LOTS. THE CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY IS VACANT LAND AND SOME RESIDENTIAL SURROUNDING USES TO THE NORTH INCLUDE INDUSTRIAL USE AND VACANT. VACANT LAND TO THE SOUTH AND SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING TO THE EAST AND WEST. THE PROPOSED USE IS FOR SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS. THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATES THIS AS URBAN MEDIUM. THE DESIGNATION CALLS FOR SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING, SO THE REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE TALL CITY PLAN. THE PRELIMINARY PLAT WAS APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION ON DECEMBER 17TH, 2018, AND THEN COUNCIL APPROVED IT ON JANUARY 8TH, 2019, AND WE DO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT REINSTATEMENT OF THE VINEYARD ADDITION, SUBJECT TO THESE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. YES, MA'AM. IS THIS. I HAVE THE ETJ AND DISTRICT FOUR BOTH ON HERE. IS IT DISTRICT FOUR? I APOLOGIZE, I BELIEVE IT IS BOTH. IT STRADDLES THE CITY LIMITS. THERE. SO WILL THIS THIS NEED TO BE ANNEXED? ULTIMATELY, YES. THAT PORTION WOULD NEED TO BE ANNEXED. AND I BELIEVE THAT IS ONE OF THE CONDITIONS LISTED. OKAY. I MUST HAVE MISSED THAT ONE. YES, SIR. I DON'T SEE SO THAT THE ANNEXATION WOULD BE APPROVED OR PROCESSED BY CITY COUNCIL. RIGHT. I AGAIN, I KNOW THAT THERE'S THERE'S BEEN SOME TALK AMONGST COUNSEL WITH SOME OF THESE ETJ ITEMS, I GUESS SINCE IT'S ALREADY ADJACENT TO WHAT'S BEEN ANNEXED, THIS IS PROBABLY PRETTY SAFE TO SAY THAT WHAT ISN'T CURRENTLY PART OF DISTRICT FOUR IS, IS GOING TO BE FINE WITH ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR TO BE HOOKED UP TO CITY UTILITIES AND ALL OF THOSE THINGS, I ASSUME. YES,

[00:40:04]

SIR. THEY WILL BE REQUIRED TO, TO CONSTRUCT THE THE WATER AND PAVING AND SEWER TO CITY STANDARDS PRIOR TO DEVELOPING. THANK YOU. YES, SIR. OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? I GUESS SO THEY'RE MOVING WITH LIKE PLANNED PROJECT APPROVAL BEFORE THIS ANNEXATION. I HAVE SEEN SEVERAL ITEMS THAT ARE COMING THAT WAY NOW. SO YES, I BELIEVE WHEN THEY GET TO FINAL, THE ANNEXATION COULD RUN CONCURRENTLY WITH THAT FINAL PLAT PROCESS. BUT IT WOULD WERE THEY TO APPEAR ON THE SAME AGENDA, THAT ANNEXATION WOULD HAVE TO APPEAR FIRST AND BE APPROVED, AND THEN THE FINAL PLAT. SO THEY COULD, IN THEORY, BE ON THE SAME AGENDA. JUST THAT ANNEXATION WOULD HAVE TO BE EARLIER IN THE AGENDA. WOULD WOULD WE BE ABLE TO APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT BEFORE ANNEXATION FROM THE COUNCIL OCCURS? IS THAT THE CASE, ELIZABETH? YOU YOU COULD, BUT THERE WOULD BE A CONDITION THAT IT HAS TO BE ANNEXED. IF THEY'RE FOLLOWING THAT ZONING, IF THEY'RE NOT INTENDING TO FOLLOW, THE INTENT HERE IS TO ANNEX. SO THE ANSWER IS YES. THERE WOULD JUST BE A CONDITION. OKAY. THANK YOU. SO I GUESS THE DEVELOPERS KNOW THAT THEY RAYS OF IF THEY ANNEXATION DON'T GET APPROVED. AND I'M JUST TALKING GENERAL, THEY ALREADY SPEND MONEY ON WORKING ON SITE PLAN. THEY'RE OKAY WITH THAT. CORRECT. OR I THINK THE DEVELOPER IS FULLY AWARE THAT THEY NEED TO ANNEX THE PROPERTY INTO CITY LIMITS.

I GUESS IT'S A RISK THAT THEY'RE WILLING TO TAKE. LET'S GO AHEAD AND GET THE PROCESS GOING BEFORE THE ANNEXATION ACTUALLY HAPPENS. YES, SIR. YES. EVERYTHING'S MOVING QUICKLY.

YEAH. AND I THINK JUST THE LAST QUESTION, SOME OIL AND GAS VARIANCES THAT WERE APPROVED.

BUT I THINK THEY WERE APPROVED SINCE 2012. THAT NOW IS A MINIMUM OF 135FT O THE DISTANCE FROM THE WELLS. I'M SORRY. IS THAT WHAT YOU SAID? YES. YES, MA'AM. THEY WERE ALLOWED TO THE HAVE THE MINIMUM OF THE 135. AND THAT WAS AT THE PREVIOUS APPROVAL IN 2012, IF I UNDERSTAND CORRECTLY. OKAY. YEAH. THAT'S ALL I HAVE. OKAY. ANYTHING ELSE FROM THE COMMISSION? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. WELL, THEN I WILL ENTERTAIN ANY MOTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE. I MOVE FOR APPROVAL. I HAVE A MOTION SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS. YES, ABSOLUTELY.

YES. SO I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THIS AND REINSTATE THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FROM COMMISSIONER MARTIN. SECOND, AND I HAVE A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER BARRY. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT, WE'LL VOTE. MOTION PASSES, 5 TO 1. THANK YOU. ITEM NUMBER 11. MOTION

[11. - Motion approving, with staff's recommended conditions, a Preliminary Plat of Crossroads Addition, Section 4, being a plat of a 24.53-acre tract of land out of Section 32, Block 40, T-1-S, T&P RR Co. Survey, Midland County, Texas. (Generally located at the northeast corner of the intersection of West County Road 74 and North County Road 1280.) (EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

APPROVING WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS. A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF CROSS ROADS ADDITION SECTION FOR BEING A PLAT OF A 24.53 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF SECTION 32, BLOCK 40 T, ONE S, T AND P RAILROAD COMMISSION SURVEY, MIDLAND COUNTY, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF WEST COUNTY ROAD 74 AND NORTH COUNTY ROAD 1280. THANK YOU. CHAIRMAN, COMMISSIONERS. PRESENT ITEM 11. ITEM 11 ON THE AGENDA IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTED BY MAVERICK ENGINEERING FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF WEST COUNTY ROAD 74 AND COUNTY ROAD 1280 TO OBTAIN ADDRESSES FOR AN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT. THE TOTAL ACREAGE OF THE PLATTED PROPERTY IS 24.53 ACRES, AND IT WILL BE PLANTED INTO EIGHT LOTS. THE CURRENT USE IS VACANT LAND.

THE USE TO THE NORTH AND EAST IS INDUSTRIAL. TO THE WEST IS THE CHURCH. TO THE SOUTH IS RESIDENTIAL. THE PROPOSED USE IS INDUSTRIAL. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOES NOT DESIGNATE THIS AREA AS. AS IS IN THE ETJ. STAFF RECOMMENDED DENIAL IN THE BEGINNING, AS. IS THIS PRELIMINARY AS THIS WAS. THE PACKAGE WAS SUPPOSED TO BE SUBMITTED OR POSTED ON THURSDAY.

WE USUALLY WAIT UNTIL LIKE FRIDAY TO POST A PACKAGE. AT THAT MOMENT, ENGINEERING DIDN'T HAVE THEIR COMMENTS APPROVED FOR THE DRAINAGE OR DEFERRALS. I WAS WAITING FOR MY DRAINAGE

[00:45:04]

REPORTS. THEREFORE THAT'S WHY IT IS STATED IS WE RECOMMENDED DENIAL, BUT BY FRIDAY ENGINEERING DID HAVE THEIR COMMENTS. SO THAT'S WHY AT THIS TIME WE'RE REVISING OUR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL FOR THIS PLAT. I KNOW IT'S KIND OF LIKE CONFUSING, SAYING DENIAL AND WE ARE SAYING APPROVAL, BUT ENGINEERING IS HERE IN CASE YOU ARE HAVING ANY QUESTIONS FOR THEM. BUT WE ARE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL AND THIS ARE OUR STANDARD CONDITION. IN CASE YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, YOU CAN EITHER ASK ME OR ASK ENGINEERING FOR ANY OF THAT.

ANY QUESTIONS? NO THANK YOU. I GUESS MY MY QUESTION ONLY WOULD JUST BE, AGAIN, DO WE DOES ENGINEERING FEEL COMFORTABLE WITH THE THE WATER AND EVERYTHING OUT THERE? ALL I JUST I KNOW THAT'S BEEN AN ISSUE SO I'LL OPEN IT UP FOR HIM. SO YES, THEY DID SUBMIT A GIC FOR THIS AREA AND IT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY OUR DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING OR NOT APPROVED.

BUT HE IS HE IS GOOD WITH THE FINDINGS ON IT. OKAY. AND WILL THIS I GUESS IT'S IN THE ETJ.

IS THERE ANY WILL THIS NEED TO EVENTUALLY BE ANNEXED AS WELL, OR CAN IT JUST STAY IN THE ETJ? IT CAN. IT CAN STAY. OKAY, SO JUST THE CITY DOES HAVE AUTHORITY WITHIN THE TWO DAY TO LOOK AT LAPSE, BUT NO ZONING AUTHORITY. SO JUST A REMINDER THERE, BUT IT CAN STAY IN THE ETJ. AND THERE'S NO INTENT AT THIS TIME TO ANNEX INTO THE CITY LIMITS. YEAH. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR OUR STAFF? OKAY. THANK YOU. APPRECIATE IT. ALL RIGHT THEN. DO I HEAR ANY MOTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION? I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THIS REQUEST. THE REQUEST? NO, NO. YEAH. RIGHT. RIGHT. JUST MAKING SURE. YEAH. AND THIS IS THIS MOTION IS BEING MADE BY COMMISSIONER SISNIEGA SECOND, AND I HAVE A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER LAFOY. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? OKAY. LET'S GO AHEAD AND VOTE ON THE MATTER.

MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU. AS PREVIOUSLY STATED, ITEMS 12, 13 AND 14 HAVE BEEN

[Item 12, 13 & 14]

[15. - Motion approving, with staff’s recommended conditions, a Preliminary Plat of Northgate Addition, Section 29 being a replat of Lots 5A and 5B, Block 34, Northgate Addition, Section 28, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located on the south side of Northbrook Lane, approximately 600 feet west of West Loop 250 North.) (DISTRICT: 1) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

REMOVED FROM OUR AGENDA. SO WE WILL MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER 15, MOTION APPROVING WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS. A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF NORTH GATE ADDITION, SECTION 29 BEING A REPLAT OF LOTS FIVE A AND FIVE B, BLOCK 34, NORTH GATE ADDITION SECTION 28. CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF NORTH BROOK LANE, APPROXIMATELY 600FT WEST OF WEST LOOP 250 NORTH. GOOD AFTERNOON, CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS. MADAM PLANNER, TO PRESENT ITEM 15. ITEM 15 IS ON THE AGENDA AS A PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTED BY MAVERICK ENGINEERING FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4813 NORTH BROOK LANE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF TOWNHOMES, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO PLAT TWO LOTS INTO FOUR LOTS. THE PROPERTY IS ZONED TO F TWO FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT. THE SURROUNDING ZONING CONSISTS OF A PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR SHOPPING CENTER. THE CURRENT USES VACANT LAND AND THE SURROUNDING USES CONSIST OF COMMERCIAL VACANT LAND AND TOWNHOMES. THE LAND USE DESIGNATION IS URBAN MEDIUM, WHICH SUPPORTS A MIX OF COMPLEMENTARY USES INCLUDING SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING AND MULTIFAMILY HOUSING. STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION. THANK YOU AND I'M OPEN FOR ANY QUESTIONS.

ANYTHING FOR STAFF. OKAY. THANK YOU. DO I HEAR ANY MOTIONS? MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE MOTION TO APPROVE THIS REQUEST FROM COMMISSIONER YEAGER. SECOND. SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER MARTIN.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? LET'S VOTE. MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU. ITEM NUMBER 16.

[16. - Motion approving, with staff's recommended conditions, a Preliminary Plat of Fairgrounds Addition, Section 9, being a replat of Lot 1, Lot 2, and a 0.042-acre portion of Lot 3, Block 12, Fairgrounds Addition, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Wolfcamp Circle and East State Highway 80.) (DISTRICT: 2) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

MOTION APPROVING WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS. A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF FAIRGROUNDS ADDITION. SECTION NINE BEING A REPLAT OF LOT ONE, LOT TWO AND A 0.042 ACRE PORTION OF LOT THREE, BLOCK 12 FAIRGROUNDS ADDITION CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF WOLF CAMP CIRCLE AND EAST STATE HIGHWAY 80. THANK YOU CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS. ANGELINA. PLANNER TO PRESENT ITEM 16.

ITEM 16 IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR FAIRGROUNDS ADDITION SECTION NINE, AND THE

[00:50:04]

REPRESENTATIVE IS MAVERICK ENGINEERING FOR A PARCEL LOCATED AT 2427 EAST HIGHWAY 80.

WE'RE WANTING TO CLEAN UP SOME LOT LINES. THEY WANT TO DO SOME FUTURE BUILDING PERMITS AND THEY NEED TO DO THIS IN ORDER TO DO SO. IT'S A 1.15 ACRE PLOT. IT'S CURRENTLY TWO LOTS GOING INTO ONE. IT'S CURRENTLY ZONED T P TECHNOLOGY PARK. ALL SURROUNDING ZONING IS THE SAME.

IT'S CURRENTLY AN INDUSTRIAL USE WITH SURROUNDING OF NORTHEAST AND WEST. ALSO INDUSTRIAL USES. AND TO THE SOUTH IS HIGHWAY 80 FOR THE PROPOSED USE IS STAYING THE SAME. THE LAND USE DESIGNATION IS GENERAL INDUSTRIAL. THIS REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE WITH OUR TULSA TOMORROW COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. THANK YOU AND I'M OPEN FOR ANY QUESTIONS. ALL RIGHT. APPRECIATE YOU. AND I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION. MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE REQUEST FROM COMMISSIONER SISNIEGA. I'LL SECOND AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER LAFORGE. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? OKAY. LET'S VOTE. MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.

THAT CONCLUDES OUR AGENDA FOR TODAY'S MEETING. SO THANK YOU VERY

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.

May 18, 2026 Planning and Zoning

Link

Social

Embed

Download

Download Selected Item