[OPENING ITEMS ]
[00:00:07]
I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND CALL THIS MEETING TO ORDER. WELCOME TO THE WESTRIDGE VILLAGE SITE PLAN COMMITTEE. I REALIZE THIS IS PERHAPS A LITTLE BIT OVERLY FORMAL, BUT FORTUNATELY THIS IS JUST HOW WE HAD TO DO IT DUE TO, YOU KNOW, STATE LAW AND WHATNOT. SO WE'LL GO AHEAD AND BEGIN. SO FOR THOSE ON THE COMMITTEE PRESENT HERE, THIS IS VERY SIMILAR TO A PRE DEV PRE DEVELOPMENT MEETING. SO FOR ADRIAN AND TAHA YOU'RE YOU'RE FAMILIAR WITH THOSE. AND SO WE'RE JUST GOING TO REVIEW THE SITE PLAN. AND SHE'S GOING TO COME UP HERE AND GIVE A PRESENTATION. AND WE'RE GOING TO REVIEW THIS THESE TWO SITE PLANS HERE AND GIVE COMMENTS.
AND WE'RE ALSO GOING TO VOTE ON THEM BECAUSE THE ORDINANCE ASSOCIATED WITH THESE PROPERTIES REQUIRES US TO VOTE ON THESE SITE PLANS IN ORDER FOR THEM TO BE ADOPTED. OKAY.
IT'S A VERY UNIQUE ZONING IN THAT WAY. SO I'LL GO AHEAD AND WE'LL TAKE UP ITEM TWO HERE.
EXCUSE ME. WE'LL DO THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE FIRST. OR DO WE HAVE THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE? YOU READY? OKAY, COOL. JUST MAKING SURE. ALL RIGHT. WE'LL GO AHEAD AND DO THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE LIKE WE NORMALLY DO THEN. ALL PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. HONOR THE TEXAS FLAG. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THEE. TEXAS. ONE STATE UNDER GOD, ONE AND INDIVISIBLE. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. WE WILL GO AHEAD AND TAKE
[2. Review and consider a proposed site plan submitted by Parkhill, on behalf of Texas Brothers, LLC, for a 0.91-acre tract of land out of Section 48, Block 40, T-1-S, T&P RR Co.Survey, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Thomason Drive and Tradewinds Bouldevard.) (DISTRICT: 4) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]
UP ITEM TWO HERE JUST TO REVIEW AND CONSIDER A PROPOSED SITE PLAN SUBMITTED BY PARK HILL ON BEHALF OF TEXAS BROTHERS, LLC FOR A 0.9 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF SECTION 48, BLOCK 42, 1ST AND P R COAST SURVEY. CITY AND COUNTY OF TEXAS, GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF THOMAS THOMASON DRIVE AND TRADEWINDS BOULEVARD IN ANGELINA PLANNER TO PRESENT ITEM TWO. ITEM TWO IS A SITE PLAN REVIEW OF T. OH. WE'RE GOING TO GO THROUGH JUST A QUICK OVERVIEW OF THE PD. WESTRIDGE VILLAGE PD WAS ADOPTED IN 2019 AND AMENDED IN 2023. AND SO ONE OF THE CONDITIONS OF SAID PD, THEY DO HAVE TO GO THROUGH THIS COMMITTEE REVIEW. THE SITE PLAN DOES HAVE AN UNDERLYING ZONING OF OUR OH TWO OFFICE DISTRICT, WITH PERMITTED USES FROM 02MF16 TOWNHOME AND REGIONAL RETAIL, AND PD DOES PROVIDE SOME FLEXIBILITY IN HOW THE PROPERTY MAY DEVELOP. AS LONG AS THEY GO THROUGH THIS PROCESS, THEY'LL STILL HAVE TO GO THROUGH ANY BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS. AND WITH THAT, THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ARE GOING TO BE GOVERNED BY PD ORDINANCE 10367, PER THE PD. A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS IS STILL REQUIRED BEFORE BUILDING PERMITS ARE ISSUED. THERE ARE NO MINIMUM OR MAXIMUM LOT AREAS OR SETBACKS, AND IF ANY STREETS REMAIN PRIVATE, NO PERMITS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ANY SPECIAL EVENTS. THE MAXIMUM TOTAL FLOOR AREA OF THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT IS ONE POINT 5,000,000FT■!S, WITH A PARKING MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT CONTINGENT ON THE PROPOSED USE, AND THE MASTER PLAN IS GOVERNED WITH THE SIGNAGE AND ANY PROHIBITED USES. THEY CANNOT HAVE ANY FUNERAL HOMES, TRUCK SALES, HEAVY TRUCKS, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, PAWN SHOP AND DANCE HALL. EVERYTHING ELSE ALLOWED IN REGIONAL RETAIL AND BELOW ARE ALLOWED IN THIS AND THE PARKING AND HEIGHT IS DESIGNATED. EACH USE HAS ITS OWN CALCULATION IN THE PD ITSELF, SO IT DOES DIFFER A LITTLE BIT FROM OUR STANDARDS. TYPICALLY IN THE CITY ORDINANCES. SO FOR H2O SPECIFICALLY OUR PROPERTY OWNER IS TEXAS BROTHERS LLC. THE REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS IS PARK HILL. IT'S GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF THOMASON AND TRADEWINDS. AND AS PER THIS ORDINANCE, THEY ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS SITE PLAN. THIS HAS BEEN PLOTTED AS WESTRIDGE SECTION 60. WE GO TO THE NEXT ONE. IT STOPPED WHEN THE SCREEN SHARING. THERE WE GO. SO THE. THE SITE PLAN FOR THIS ONE SHOWS T O TO THE NORTH SIDE OF THIS. THEY DID PLOT IT AND WITH THAT EXTRA LOT TO GO ELSEWHERE FROM THE REVIEW OF IT, THERE WERE NO OBJECTIONS SET OUT WHEN I SENT THIS OUT TO STAFF. ALL STAFF HAS BEEN OKAY WITH IT. PLANNING DID LOOK AND IT IS MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PD STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS SITE PLAN BASED ON FIVE CRITERIA. THE USE IS AN ACCEPTABLE USE IN OUR REGIONAL RETAIL DISTRICT OF. THE USE OF A DRIVE THROUGH RESTAURANT RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE THROUGH THE AREA IS DESIGNATED AS A SPECIAL STUDY AREA IN OUR TALL CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, WHICH MEANS THERE ARE NO RESTRICTIONS. THE AREA IS BEING RAPIDLY DEVELOPED INTO COMMERCIAL USES AND THERE ARE LITTLE TO NO RESIDENTIAL USES IN THE. IMMEDIATELY ABUTTING THE CLOSEST IS GOING TO BE ACROSS LOOP 250. IF FOR SOME REASON THIS WAS DENIED BY THE COMMITTEE, THERE IS AN APPEAL PROCESS THEY CAN GO THROUGH TO COUNSEL. AND WITH THAT, I'M OPEN TO ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. ANGELINA. OKAY. I DO[00:05:06]
HAVE ONE REQUEST TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM FROM MR. ERIC WEST HERE. GREAT. ERIC WEST PARK HILL, 1700 WEST WALL. SO I WAS ACTUALLY GOING TO SPEAK JUST TO MAKE SURE I GAVE AN OVERVIEW OF THE PD AND KIND OF A LITTLE BIT OF CONTEXT. BUT ANGELINA DID A GREAT JOB ON, ON A LOT OF THAT.SO I WILL TALK A COUPLE OF SPECIFICS JUST TO KIND OF SET SOME STAGE. AND THEN WE'RE REALLY WORKING WITH THE OVERALL DEVELOPER PONTICUS DEVELOPMENT. WE ENDED UP SUBMITTING THE SITE, BUT THERE'S ANOTHER ENGINEER AND I THINK THERE'S, THERE MAY BE FOLKS ONLINE THAT, THAT ARE AVAILABLE TO ANSWER SPECIFIC QUESTIONS IF THEY NEED TO ON THAT. AND, YOU KNOW, THE, THE MAIN THING HERE IS THAT THE CITY OF MIDLAND DOESN'T REALLY HAVE A MIXED USE KIND OF ZONING.
AND SO THE ONLY WAY TO DO THAT IS THROUGH PLAN DEVELOPMENT. AND PLAN DEVELOPMENT IS GREAT FOR CERTAIN THINGS. IT'S IT ALLOWS A LOT OF FLEXIBILITY. SO WE'VE COMBINED MULTIPLE TYPES OF USES, YOU KNOW, INTO ONE PIECE OF LAND. AND THAT'S REALLY GREAT. THAT GIVES A LOT OF FLEXIBILITY AND IT'S ALLOWED THEM TO, TO MARKET IT IN A WIDE VARIETY OF WAYS. BUT ONE OF THE BIGGEST DETRIMENTS TO A PD IS IF IT'S TIED TO A REALLY RIGID SITE PLAN, THEN YOU HAVE TO GO BACK THROUGH AN ENTIRE ZONING PROCESS EVERY TIME YOU WANT TO DO IT. AND SO THE IDEA 7 OR 8 YEARS AGO WAS TRY TO HAVE SOME COMPROMISE WHERE THERE WAS THE FLEXIBILITY IN THE PD, BUT WITHOUT THE HAVING TO COME BACK AND REVISIT IT IN FULL EACH TIME. AND SO THIS THIS COMMITTEE WAS THE RESULT OF THAT. AND SO JUST, JUST A LITTLE BIT OF CONTEXT FOR HOW IT FITS IN. AND THEN ANGELINA GAVE YOU ALL THE REST OF THE THE GOOD DETAIL ON THAT. I DON'T REALLY HAVE ANYTHING SPECIFICALLY TO SAY ABOUT THE SITE PLAN. AS THE ENGINEER FOR THE MASTER DEVELOPER, WE'RE ALSO REVIEWING THESE AS THEY AS THEY COME IN TO THEM LOOKING AT.
MAKE SURE IT FITS. AND EVERY, EVERY TIME THEY'RE LOOKING AT A NEW NEW DEVELOPMENT, THEY'RE REWORKING THE ENTIRETY OF THE SITE PLAN. AND WE WORK WITH THEM ON THAT TO MAKE SURE IT ALL CONTINUES TO FIT IN WITH THAT. I'M, I'M OPEN TO ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU GUYS MIGHT HAVE FOR, FOR ME OR FOR THE DEVELOPER. ALL RIGHT. VERY WELL. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I'LL GO AHEAD AND OPEN IT UP TO THE COMMITTEE THEN FOR DISCUSSION. AGAIN, REMINDER VERY SIMILAR TO, SAY LIKE A MEETING WHERE WE JUST COMMENT ON WHAT WE SEE. I WILL SAY, FIRSTLY, AS FAR AS THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE GOES, I KNOW OUR CITY TRUCKS ARE LOADED LEFT SIDE. AND SO I DON'T KNOW IF PERHAPS THE DEVELOPERS MAYBE GOING TO USE LIKE A PRIVATE TRASH COMPANY, BUT THAT MIGHT JUST BE SOMETHING TO TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THAT MIGHT NEED TO BE RELOCATED. AND ALSO, I THINK IT LOOKS LIKE EVERYTHING IS RIGHT TURN IN, RIGHT, TURN OUT ON BOTH SIDES, RIGHT. SO THE ONLY WAY TO GET IN. YOU WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO GET IN OFF OF THOMASIN GOING TOWARDS THE WEST. YOU DON'T. AND ON TRADE WINDS YOU'D ONLY BE ABLE TO. YOU'D HAVE TO TURN LEFT ONTO THOMASON AND THEN RIGHT TO GET IN. IF YOU WERE COMING FROM THE NORTH. YEAH. AND THAT I CAN ANSWER THAT QUESTION WHILE YOU'VE GOT IT. IN THE OVERALL PLAN. THERE IS CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN ALL OF THE LOTS. AND SO OFF OF THOMASIN, THERE WILL BE A FULL INTERSECTION THAT'S FURTHER DOWN THAT MATCHES WITH THE CREST VIEW BAPTIST CHURCH ENTRANCE. AND THEN AT THAT TIME, THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO, TO GET IN ALL THE WAY TO THE PROPERTY FROM, FROM THAT ENTRANCE.
THAT'S OBVIOUSLY A FUTURE PIECE, BUT ALL OF THOSE PROPERTIES ARE ACTUALLY GOING PRETTY QUICKLY.
YOU'LL PROBABLY SEE THOSE AT THE VERY NEXT TIME YOU ALL GET TOGETHER. OKAY, SO WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT, ARE YOU ARE NOT PLANNING TO CONNECT TO THE FULL ACCESS DRIVE, WHICH IS A KENNEWICK DRIVER RIGHT NOW THAT THAT'S THE ONE, THAT'S THE ONE THAT KENT QUICK BUILT IS DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM THE CREST VIEW. THAT WILL BE THE FULL ACCESS. ARE YOU PLANNING TO CONNECT WITH THIS? YES. YEAH. THEY'LL THEY'LL BE AN ACCESS DRIVE ALL THE WAY ACROSS. YEAH.
ALSO ONE OF THE COMMENT ON THE PLAT WAS THAT TO MAKE IT PHYSICALLY RIGHT IT RIGHT OUT, YOU HAVE TO PROVIDE THE MEDIAN ON THOMASON WHICH WILL BE REQUIRED WITH THE BUILDING PERMIT. TO MAKE A PHYSICAL. I MEAN, IF WE JUST PUT THE SIGN THERE RIGHT IN, RIGHT OUT, IT'S NOT GOING TO WORK. SO, I MEAN, MY QUESTION WOULD BE IF THE IF THE RIGHT IN, RIGHT OUT IS, IS
[00:10:09]
WHAT THE THE CITY IS WANTING. LIKE. WOULD THE CITY IS THE CITY PLANNING ON PUTTING THOSE MEDIANS IN ON ALL OF. THOMASON. IT WILL BE DEVELOPER RESPONSIBILITY TO PUT THE MEDIAN ALONG THE FURNITURE. OKAY. AND THAT'D BE SOMETHING THAT I WANT TO TO. WE MET WITH A FEW MONTHS AGO AND I BRING UP THE SAME POINT. DIDN'T DISCUSS AFTER THAT, BUT YEAH, I TOLD YOU ALSO. OKAY. YEAH, AS LONG AS THEY'RE AWARE THEN THAT'S FINE. ANY DEVS THAT ARE COMING IN IN THIS AREA, WE HAVE BEEN LETTING THEM KNOW THAT THEY ARE AWARE OF THE RIGHT IN, RIGHT OUT AND THAT IT WILL BE A MEDIAN. WE DO INCLUDE THAT IN THOSE PREDEVELOPMENT NOTES TO ANYONE IN THIS DEVELOPMENT, ALONG WITH A COPY OF THE PD FROM FROM MY OWN KNOWLEDGE IS THERE'S NOT A TON OF MEDIANS IN IN MIDLAND, BUT THERE ARE SOME THAT HAVE BEEN STRATEGICALLY PUT IN OVER THE YEARS. ARE WE TRYING TO MOVE TRAFFIC WISE TO WHERE WE HAVE MORE OF THAT JUST BECAUSE OF THE TRAFFIC OR WHAT WHAT'S CAUSING THAT? IS THAT JUST A NEW THING? THAT'S I MEAN, I OBVIOUSLY SEE IT IN A LOT OF OTHER BIG CITIES, AND I'M NOT OPPOSED TO IT. I'M JUST KIND OF WONDERING WHERE IT'S ALL COMING FROM. SO THE SO THE MOST OF THE CRASHES IN CITY OF MIDLAND, ABOUT 50% IS BECAUSE OF THE LEFT HAND MOVEMENT. SO MEDIAN BASICALLY RESTRICT THE LEFT HAND MOVEMENT, BUT ALLOW YOU TO MAKE A U-TURN TO GET TO THE ANY PROPERTY YOU WANT. WE DO HAVE MEDIAN ON TRADEWINDS BOULEVARD, WHICH IS RIGHT NEXT TO IT. WE ARE PLANNING ON THOMASON TO HAVE A MEDIAN THERE. ALSO AT THIS LOCATION. MEDIAN IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE THEY ARE ABOUT LESS THAN 300FT AWAY FROM THE INTERSECTION. SO IF SOMEBODY'S MAKING A LEFT OUT, BASICALLY THEY'RE MAKING A LEFT OUT IN A LEFT TURN LANE FOR THE SIGNAL AT REDMOND AND THOMASON.OKAY. AND THIS INTERSECTION WILL CREATE A LOT OF TRAFFIC BECAUSE OF THE HIGH SCHOOL GOING RIGHT THERE. SO MEDIAN IS JUST BASICALLY FOR THE SAFETY OF FOR THE, FOR THE CUSTOMER, FOR THIS PROPERTY. ALSO, THE RESIDENTS OF THE MIDLAND. OKAY. THANKS. ADRIAN. DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS ON THE SITE PLAN? NO, I BELIEVE TAHA ADDRESSED IT. OKAY. OKAY. AND JUST SO JUST TO GET A RESPONSE TO ON THE TRASH ENCLOSURE THEN, IS THAT GOING TO THAT LOCATION IS GOING TO WORK FOR YOU ALL. THEN IF YOU ARE ONE CITY, OKAY. IT IS. YES. OKAY. OKAY. EXCELLENT. OKAY.
JUST MAKING SURE BECAUSE THAT WOULD OF COURSE AFFECT THE LAYOUT. SO WHAT, YOU HAVE TO COME BACK HERE AGAIN. YEAH. SO OKAY, WE DO ALSO MAKE SURE THOSE ARE INCLUDED IN THOSE NOTES AS WELL. OKAY. THOSE NOTES THEY ARE THAT CITY ONLY OPERATES SIDE LOAD. AND SO IF THEY'RE DOING FRONT LOAD IT WILL BE PRIVATE SERVICE. OKAY. VERY GOOD. I GUESS THE ONLY THING THAT I WOULD TOUCH ON, AND I BELIEVE YOU GUYS ALREADY ARE AWARE OF THIS, IS THE REGIONAL REPORT DONE BY PARK HILL, JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU GUYS ARE ABIDING BY THAT THAT REPORT. OKAY. WELL, IF THERE'S NO FURTHER DISCUSSION, WE'LL GO AHEAD AND WE'LL TAKE A VOTE ON IT. ONE QUESTION BEFORE JUST JUST BECAUSE WE WERE TALKING ABOUT THE MEDIANS AND EVERYTHING, HOW DOES THAT HAS THAT HOW DOES THAT AFFECT THE ACCESS FOR FIRE AND FOR MEDICAL AND ALL THE OTHER EMERGENCY PERSONNEL? DOES IT DOES IT JUST MAKE IT THAT MUCH HARDER FOR THEM TO GET TO THE. WOULD YOU BE ABLE TO SPEAK OR DO THEY NOT HAVE TO FOLLOW THOSE KINDS OF RULES? THEY CAN JUST I MEAN, IN AN EMERGENCY. YEAH, BASICALLY PD OR FIRE DEPARTMENT CAN GO IN A WRONG WAY AND THEY HAVE THE LIGHTS ON. SO BASICALLY TRAFFIC IS STOPPED FOR THEM. WHEN WE WHEN WE PUT THE MEDIAN, WE DESIGN IN A WAY THAT ALL THE PROPERTY HAS AT LEAST ONE FULL ACCESS. SO YES, THEY WILL, THIS PROPERTY WILL ALSO HAVE FULL ACCESS. BUT THIS DRIVEWAY, WHICH IS RIGHT IN FRONT OF THIS PROPERTY, WILL BE RIGHT IN, RIGHT OUT. SO IT'S NOT FULLY RESTRICTING THE DRIVEWAY. I'M JUST THINKING BECAUSE WHERE THE THE FIREHOUSE IS THERE, IF, IF THERE WERE SOMETHING, I MEAN, WHERE THEY'RE COMING FROM, THEY WOULD HAVE TO CROSS ALL OF THAT TRAFFIC TO, TO GET IN AND MAKE A BIG OLD TURN. IT JUST BE EASIER IF THEY COULD MAKE THAT
[00:15:03]
LEFT TURN IN. BUT IF FIRE ENGINE CANNOT MAKE A LEFT TURN, THEY NORMALLY GO IN THE WRONG WAY. OKAY, THAT'S THE NORMAL PRACTICE IF IT HELPS. JOSH, I DID ROUTE THIS TO OUR FIRE DEPARTMENT, AND THE COMMENT FROM THE FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE WAS THAT THEY DID REVIEW THE SITE PLAN. THEY HAD NO OBJECTION, SUBJECT TO THE 2015 IFC FIRE APPARATUS. ACCESS ROADS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE IFC, AND THEN THAT AN OFFICIAL FINAL COMPLIANCE WILL BE VERIFIED AT THE TIME OF CIVIL PLAN REVIEW AND THE BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL AND ANY ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MAY BE IDENTIFIED THERE, SO THEY WILL STILL BE LOOKING AT IT AS WE MOVE THROUGH THIS PROCESS. AND ONCE WE GET THIS APPROVAL FOR JUST THE SITE PLAN TODAY IS ALL THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT AND CONSIDERING, THEN THEY'LL START MOVING THROUGH THAT BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS AND IT'S GOING TO BE REVIEWED AGAIN AT THAT TIME. THANK YOU. I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING ELSE. OKAY. YEAH. AND JUST TO REITERATE WHAT ANGELINA HAD SAID, THIS IS JUST FOR JUST FOR THE SITE PLAN THAT WE'RE CONSIDERING TODAY. SO JUST TO MAKE SURE BEFORE WE MAKE OUR VOTES, I MEAN, TALK WITH YOUR COMMENTS. ARE YOU OKAY WITH THE SITE PLAN AS IS RIGHT NOW, OR WOULD YOU HAVE THEM MAKE CHANGES TO THIS LAYOUT? I'M.SINCE WE ARE TALKING ABOUT THE SITE PLAN AND MEDIAN IS OUTSIDE THE SITE PLAN, SO I'M. I'M FINE WITH THE SITE PLAN, BUT CAN WE ADD A NOTE? CAN WE APPROVE IT WITH THE CONDITION THAT MEDIANS WILL BE REQUIRED WITH THE BUILDING PERMIT? BECAUSE I'M GOOD WITH THE SITE PLAN AND MEDIAN IS IN THE RIGHT OF IT. YEAH, YEAH. THIS THIS COMMITTEE IS IN NO WAY REPLACING THE BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW. SO THAT'S STILL GOING TO TAKE PLACE. SO SO YEAH, BY, BY APPROVING THE SITE PLAN, YOU'RE NOT THEREFORE APPROVING THE BUILDING PERMIT OR ANYTHING THAT'S STILL GOING TO BE REVIEWED. I'LL MAKE SURE THEY ALSO HAVE A COPY OF THE STAFF REPORT THAT WENT WITH THIS ONE. AND IT DOES HAVE YOUR COMMENT IN THERE THAT DOES STATE THAT WE DO NEED THAT. AND I BELIEVE THAT ALSO WAS IN THE PLAT. OKAY. THEY SHOULD HAVE COPIES OF ALL THOSE STAFF REPORTS. WE'LL MAKE SURE WE WORK WITH APPLICANTS DURING THE BUILDING PROCESS AS WELL. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. WELL, THERE'S NO FURTHER DISCUSSION. THEN WE'LL GO AND TAKE A VOTE. SO ALL IN FAVOR OF APPROVAL, SAY I, I. OKAY. YEAH, SURE. MOTION PASSES 4 TO 0.
OKAY. VERY GOOD. THIS IS OUR SECOND TIME EVER DOING THIS. AND THE LAST TIME WE DID IT WAS LIKE TWO YEARS AGO. SO JUST GIVE US A LITTLE GRACE. BUT OKAY, SO OUR LAST ITEM, ITEM
[3.Review and consider a proposed site plan submitted by Huitt-Zollars, Inc, on behalf of Loop 250 2025 West Tract, LLC, for a 1.131-acre tract of land out of Section 48, Block 40, T-1-S, T&P RR Co. Survey, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located on the west side of South Loop 250 West, approximately 410 feet south of Thomason Drive.) (DISTRICT: 4) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE]
THREE IS A REVIEW. AND CONSIDER A PROPOSED SITE PLAN SUBMITTED BY HEWITT ZOLLARS INCORPORATED ON BEHALF OF LOOP TO 52,025 WEST TRACT LLC FOR A 1.131 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF SECTION 48, BLOCK 40T1STMPR CO SURVEY CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF SOUTH LOOP. 250 WEST, APPROXIMATELY 410FT SOUTH OF THOMPSON DRIVE. THANK YOU ANGELINA. PLANNER TO PRESENT ITEM THREE. MAYBE THIS IS GOING TO BE A SIMILAR ONE. IT'LL BE A LITTLE BIT SHORTER BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE BACKGROUND ON THE PD. LET ME SEE. GIVE US JUST A SECOND. IT LOOKS LIKE WE'RE HAVING SOME ISSUES WITH THIS ONE. SO FOR THIS ONE THE PROPERTY OWNER IS GOING TO BE LOOP. 250 2025 WEST TRACT LLC. AND IT IS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF LOOP 250, APPROXIMATELY 410FT SOUTH OF THOMPSON. THIS IS JUST TO THE NORTH OF THE HONDA THAT'S ALREADY THERE AND DEVELOPED. SO HERE'S A SITE PLAN OF THE PROPERTY. SO THIS IS BEING PLOTTED RIGHT NOW. THERE ARE TWO LOTS. SO TO THE THE LOT ON THE WEST SIDE OF IT IS GOING TO BE USED FOR THE MIDLAND DIAGNOSTIC ANIMAL HOSPITAL STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THIS SITE PLAN FOR THE NEW MIDLAND DIAGNOSTIC VETERINARY HOSPITAL BASED ON THE SAME FIVE CRITERIA AND. THIS USE IS ALLOWED WITHIN THE ZONING. IT IS A SPECIAL STUDY AREA. IT IS BEING RAPIDLY DEVELOPED AND THERE ARE NO RESIDENTIAL USES, AND WE DIDN'T SEE ANY HUGE ISSUES WHEN THIS WAS ROUTED OUT. ALL DEPARTMENT COMMENTS DID SHOW APPROVED AS WELL. THE SAME WILL BE STANDARD FOR THIS. THE T IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY BUILDING PERMIT CAN OCCUR, AND WE'LL WORK THROUGH THE BUILDING PROCESS WITH THOSE APPLICANTS.THIS IS JUST THAT FIRST STEP. THANKS AND I'M OPEN FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU ANGELINA.
ALL RIGHT. I DON'T HAVE ANY REQUESTS TO SPEAK ON THIS ONE, BUT I MEAN, FEEL FREE, YOU KNOW, ERIC OR ANYONE IF YOU'D LIKE TO COME UP AND PROVIDE COMMENTS. I'LL GO AHEAD AND OPEN IT UP FOR DISCUSSION. THE COMMITTEE. OKAY. YEAH, SURE. THANK YOU. YEAH. NO IT'S FINE. OKAY. I WANT TO THANK THE COMMITTEE FOR YOUR TIME, YOUR INPUT ON THE PROJECT. AND I'M REALLY GLAD
[00:20:02]
PARK HILLS HERE, ALTHOUGH THE REPRESENTING THE DEVELOPER I HAD CAN CAN YOU PULL THAT SITE PLAN BACK UP OR. JUST HAD A COMMENT ABOUT TRAFFIC MORE THAN ANYTHING CURRENTLY IN THE CITY OF MIDLAND IS INVOLVED WITH THE DSL AND TXDOT ENTRY FOR A NEW DRIVE RIGHT OFF OF TWO, AND YOU CAN SEE IT UP THERE IN THE TOP OF THAT DRAWING COMING IN. BUT THAT DRIVE JUST GOES TO THIS FACILITY AND THEN IT KIND OF STOPS. SO I THINK YOU WERE MENTIONING HOW THAT ARTERY WOULD WOULD COME ON AROUND AND BEND BACK ALL THE WAY TO THOMPSON. YEAH. SO. I GUESS I, I DON'T HAVE A TIMETABLE FOR THAT THOUGH. DO YOU DO YOU HAVE AN IDEA OF WHEN. SO WE'RE IT'LL PROBABLY GET SUBMITTED TO THE CITY IN THREE WEEKS. OKAY. FOR, FOR SUBMITTAL TO, TO BE REVIEWED. YEAH. SO BEING PROACTIVE, I JUST ON THE OWNER'S SIDE, I'M JUST THINKING, YOU KNOW, WITHOUT THE ARTERY CONNECTION, EVERYBODY WOULD HAVE TO TURN AROUND IN THAT PARKING LOT. SO IT'S GOOD TO KNOW. AND THAT'S GOING TO REALLY IMPROVE THINGS. OKAY.THAT'S KIND OF WHAT I WANT TO ADD TO THE STORY. SO OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU.
SO IT SOUNDS LIKE THAT NEW STREET THAT IT'S IT SAYS THERE THAT'S GOING TO BE SOMETHING THAT'S BUILT IN. AND WILL THAT BE DONE BY THE CITY, OR IS THAT GOING TO BE DONE AS DEVELOPMENT GROWS? YEAH. SO THIS IS AN INTERNAL ACCESS DRIVE THAT THE DEVELOPER, THE, THE OVERALL DEVELOPER IS PUTTING IN. AND SO IT WILL START THERE OFF OF LOOP 250 BY THE VETERINARY CLINIC, AND THEN WRAP BACK AROUND AND GO BEHIND ALL THE WAY BEHIND THE HTO AND, AND, AND BACK OVER CONNECTING TO TRADE WINDS, TRADE WINDS. SO THAT WOULD BE A THROUGH ACCESS THAT IS FULLY ON THE ON THE SITE, NOT A CITY STREET OR ANYTHING. OKAY. BUT THAT'S IN DESIGN AND AND WILL BE READY TO SUBMIT HERE PRETTY QUICKLY. THAT WOULD BE MAINTAINED BY THE DEVELOPER.
YEAH. SO IT WILL BE A PRIVATE ACCESS DRIVE THAT WILL BE PART OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, I BELIEVE. OKAY. THANK YOU. OKAY. AND THEN WHILE WE'RE ON THE TOPIC OF STREETS, AND I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WOULD HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD TO FOR DRIVE, PARK DID SUBMIT THE DRIVE TO TEXT AND TEXT OR DID APPROVE THE DRIVEWAY OFF OF LOOP 250 FURNITURE ROAD, AND EVERYTHING ELSE INSIDE THIS PROPERTY WILL BE PRIVATE STREET. OKAY. AND THEN ADRIAN, DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS? SAME COMMENT AS THE OTHER SITE PLAN. JUST MAKE SURE THAT YOU'RE FOLLOWING THE REGIONAL DRAINAGE REPORT IN THIS AREA. I BELIEVE EVERYTHING IS. WE SHOULD BE HEADING SOUTH TOWARDS THE THE BASIN OFF OF WHAT IS THAT SOUTH STREET? I THINK IT STARTS WITH AN A, DO YOU REMEMBER? TO THE STREET TO THE SOUTH. ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT THE ONE THAT'S ALL THE WAY TOWARDS CINERGY? BY THE BY, THE. I DON'T KNOW THAT ONE. YEAH. WE CAN PULL UP A MAP. SO THAT'S YOU SAID THAT'S WHERE THE DRAINAGE SHOULD BE FLOWING. YEAH. THAT'S WHERE THEY HAVE THEIR REGIONAL POND. OKAY. SO I BELIEVE DRAINAGE PARK HILL DID A REGIONAL DRAINAGE REPORT FOR THAT WHOLE DEVELOPMENT. AND I BELIEVE EVERYTHING DRAINS TO THE SOUTH THERE AND EVENTUALLY SPILLS OVER ACROSS IS A LEISURE, LEISURE, LEISURE. I DO BELIEVE A NOTE WAS MADE ON THOSE PLOTS TOO FOR THAT AS WELL PER COMMENTS DURING ENGINEERING. OKAY. DOES DOES THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE HIGH SCHOOL AFFECT ANY OF THAT AT ALL, OR IS THAT ALREADY PLANNED IN? IT'S DIFFERENT. IT'S JUST SOUTH OF THE HONDA DEALERSHIP. IT'S JUST FOR THIS PROPERTY. OKAY, A DIFFERENT WATERSHED. YEAH. OKAY. OKAY. THE ONLY THING ONLY TWO THINGS I HAVE AGAIN, THE TRASH ENCLOSURE. JUST ENSURE THAT THAT IS APPROPRIATE LOCATION WHERE IT CAN BE ACCESSED.
OTHERWISE IF YOU CHANGE IT AND YOU END UP CHANGING YOUR SITE, THERE'S POTENTIAL FOR YOU TO HAVE TO COME BACK HERE AGAIN, RIGHT? SO AND THEN SECONDLY, I SEE PART OF THE LANDSCAPING IS SHOWN ON HERE. LOOKS LIKE YOU HAVE THE TREES OR I DON'T SEE THE PLANT MATERIAL. AND THAT'S FINE IF YOU DON'T HAVE THE PLANT MATERIAL ON HERE. BUT JUST KEEP IN MIND THAT IF YOU HAVE NOT ACCOUNTED FOR THE PLANT MATERIAL, THAT THAT ALSO MAY END UP CHANGING THE SITE LAYOUT. SO I DON'T KNOW IF ANYONE CAN SPEAK ON THAT. IF SOMEONE HAS VERIFIED THAT THE
[00:25:06]
CORRECT AMOUNT OF PLANT MATERIAL HAS BEEN ACCOUNTED FOR THIS SITE. YES. OKAY. WE HAVEN'T. OKAY. THAT LANDSCAPING PLAN. OKAY. I MEAN, WE'RE GOING TO BEFORE IT ENTERS THE PERMITTING. OKAY. THE TREES ARE FOR THE CODE FOR THE MIDLAND CODE AND. THE PLANNING AS WELL.OKAY. THEY ARE MEETING CURRENT CITY CODE AND DO PLAN TO, BEFORE THE BUILDING PERMIT TO GET A FULL LANDSCAPE PLAN, AND IT'LL BE RELOOKED OVER AGAIN THROUGH THAT BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS. OKAY. AND WE'LL MAKE SURE TO WORK WITH THE APPLICANT AS WELL AS CITY STAFF TO MAKE SURE THOSE ARE THE MEETING, BOTH CITY CODE AND AS WELL AS THIS PD. OKAY. SOUNDS GOOD. OH, SORRY. AND ONE OTHER THING. I'M NOT SEEING THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PARKING SPACES ON HERE. I DON'T KNOW IF I'M JUST MISSING THEM, BUT WE NEED TO VERIFY THAT THEY'RE AT LEAST 18 BY 20 OR EXCUSE ME BY SAYING BY 20. YES. SORRY. 20. MY BAD. THEY WERE. WE HAD A PRENUP WITH THEM NOT TOO LONG AGO ON THIS ONE. AND SO I KNOW THAT JUST TYPICAL NINE BY 18, NINE BY 18. OKAY.
IT'S JUST REALLY SMALL. YEAH. OKAY. LET'S SEE. IT SAYS 54 SPACES TOTAL TYPICAL SIZE. AND THEN I CAN'T TELL WHAT THE NUMBERS ARE, BUT OKAY, WHEN YOU SUBMIT FOR YOUR BUILDING PERMIT, THEY'RE GOING TO TELL YOU THAT THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO BE NINE BY 20. AND I REALIZE THAT OUR PARKING SENSORS SAY NINE BY 18, BUT THEY ALSO SAY NINE BY 20, RIGHT? SO WE'VE HAD, AS A DEPARTMENT, WE JUST HAD TO MAKE THE DECISION THAT WE'RE GOING TO GO WITH NINE BY 20. I DON'T THINK THAT THAT'S A SIGNIFICANT ENOUGH CHANGE FOR YOU TO HAVE TO COME BACK HERE, BECAUSE YOU'LL STILL BE CONFORMING TO THE SITE PLAN, UNLESS YOU DO END UP HAVING TO MOVE THINGS AROUND. RIGHT. BUT JUST KEEP THAT IN MIND. YOU'LL NEED TO ADJUST THAT TO NINE BY 20. YEAH.
AND JUST A REMINDER FOR THIS, THE PD DOES HAVE A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT. SO THEY ARE ONLY REQUIRED A 2.5 FOR EVERY 1000 SQUARE FOOT FOR THEIR OFFICE USE. OKAY. THERE WAS SOME DIFFERENCE IN. SO THE LAST ONE IS EIGHT BY 1000 FOR THE RETAIL. BUT FOR THE OFFICE USE IT'S ONLY 2.5 FOR EVERY 1000FT■S OF THE BUILDING. AND THEY ARE MEETING THAT CURRENTLY ON THIS.
OKAY. SO HOW MANY ARE THEY. I JUST HAVEN'T DONE THE MATH YET. HOW MANY DO THEY HAVE TO HAVE? 2000FT. SO. OH, SO YOU ONLY NEED FIVE SIX. SO YOU'VE GOT EXTRA EXCESS PARKING. YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO FIT IT ALL IN. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. DOCUMENTS THERE STAFF. OKAY. THEY'VE GOT THE MINIMUM. AND THEN THEY'RE DOING A LITTLE BIT EXTRA ON THEIR SIDE. SHOULD BE ADEQUATE.
OKAY. WELL THERE'S NOTHING ELSE. THEN WE'LL GO AHEAD AND I HAVE ONE MORE. GO AHEAD. SINCE PD REQUIRED THE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, IS IT PARTIAL RESPONSIBILITY TO SUBMIT THE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY OR OR THE INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPERS. SO WE HAVEN'T DISCUSSED THAT PREVIOUSLY ON ANY OF THE OTHER WORK OUT HERE. THERE WAS A TRAFFIC STUDY DONE THAT SHOWED THIS ENTIRE AREA AS RETAIL. AND SO WE'VE BEEN RELYING ON THE FACT THAT THAT REALLY HAS NOT CHANGED. WE HAVEN'T DONE ANYTHING THAT MODIFIED THAT ASSUMPTION THAT THIS WOULD ALL DEVELOP AS RETAIL. SO OUR OUR PLAN WAS IF, IF THERE EVER WAS, SAY, A RESIDENTIAL USER THAT WANTED TO COME IN HERE, YOU KNOW, MULTIFAMILY OR SOMETHING. AND WE NEEDED TO, TO ANALYZE THAT SEPARATELY FROM WHAT'S BEEN DONE BEFORE. THEN WE WOULD DO THAT IF THERE IS SPECIFIC TRAFFIC QUESTIONS OR THINGS RELATED TO ANY INDIVIDUAL SITE, THEN THEN WE WOULD REFER TO EACH INDIVIDUAL SITE, YOU KNOW, DEVELOPER TO, TO DO THAT. BUT WE'LL, WE'LL STICK TO THAT OVERALL KIND OF TRAFFIC STUDY THAT WAS DONE FOR THIS ENTIRE KIND OF WEST AREA OUTSIDE THE LOOP UNTIL SOMETHING CHANGES WITHIN THIS DEVELOPMENT THAT WE THINK MODIFIES THAT SIGNIFICANTLY. IF THAT, THAT DOESN'T WORK. OKAY. YEAH, WE REVIEWED THE DRIVE APPROACH ON, ON THE LOOP TO 50 TEXT IS FINE, CITY IS FINE. SO I DON'T THINK SO. TRAFFIC NEW TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY IS REQUIRED. YEAH, THAT'S EXACTLY THE WAY WE WERE KIND OF THINKING OF IT. I DON'T THINK ANYTHING'S REALLY CHANGED. AND THAT'S THAT'S BEEN SEVERAL YEARS BACK THAT THAT WAS DONE.
BUT WE DON'T SEE A NEED TO DO ANOTHER ONE UNLESS SOMETHING DOES CHANGE. I AGREE WITH THAT.
OKAY. I GOT ONE OTHER ITEM AS FAR AS UTILITY CONNECTIONS. WHERE ARE YOU GUYS PROPOSING TO GET YOUR SERVICES FROM? SO SEWER IS ACTUALLY ALREADY BEEN REVIEWED BY THE CITY FIRST.
[00:30:04]
IT'S COMING FROM THE TRADE WINDS SIDE BECAUSE OF THE WAY THE THE LAND FALLS. AND THAT'S ACTUALLY GOING TO BE ROUTED IN THAT SAME ACCESS EASEMENT, THE PRIVATE ACCESS. WE'RE GOING TO HAVE THE SEWER LINE COMING OVER. AND THAT'S WHAT WILL PROVIDE THE SEWER SERVICE HERE. THERE IS WATER THAT'S ON LOOP 250. AND SO THEY'LL BE ABLE TO EXTEND A SERVICE STRAIGHT FROM LOOP 250. SO WILL YOU GUYS BE PROVIDING A UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG THAT ACCESS ROAD? YES.OKAY. YES. IT'S A SAD QUESTION. I'M GOING TO ASK YOU AFTER THE MEETING ABOUT EASEMENT LANGUAGE.
BUT ANYWAY, I WON'T BORE YOU ALL WITH THAT. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SOUNDS GOOD. WELL, IF THERE ARE NO FURTHER COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS, THEN WE'LL GO AHEAD AND MOVE TO THE VOTE. SO ALL IN FAVOR OF APPROVING THE SITE PLAN, SAY I AND RAISE YOUR HAND, I. MOTION PASSES 4 TO 0. ALL RIGHT. VERY GOOD. WELL, THAT IS ALL THE ITEMS ON OUR AGENDA TODAY. SO WE WILL ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 3:36
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.