9. - Hold a public hearing and consider a Preliminary Plat of Arnett’s Acres, Section 2, being a replat of Lot 5, Arnett’s Acres, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located on the east side of North Lamesa Road, approximately 350 feet north of East Golf Course Road.) (DISTRICT: 2) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)

[9. - Hold a public hearing and consider a Preliminary Plat of Arnett’s Acres, Section 2, being a replat of Lot 5, Arnett’s Acres, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located on the east side of North Lamesa Road, approximately 350 feet north of East Golf Course Road.) (DISTRICT: 2) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE) ]

ITEMS ON THE PUBLIC PUBLIC HEARING SECTION. WE WILL READ IT. AND THEN WE'LL HAVE A SPOT WHERE WE CAN HAVE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC CAN EITHER VOICE THEIR OPPOSITION OR THEIR. I GUESS THEY'RE EITHER FOR IT OR AGAINST IT. BUT AND THEN WE'LL WE'LL VOTE ON IT THAT WAY. IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE YOU CAN BE. THE PROCEDURE IS THAT WAY. IT DOESN'T REALLY HAVE. OKAY. THE STAFF'S GOING TO PRESENT THE REQUEST. THE APPLICANT WILL PRESENT THE REQUEST AND RESPOND TO ANY QUESTIONS. THEN THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR WILL ADDRESS THE COMMISSION. THOSE WHO ARE OPPOSED WILL OR WISH TO HAVE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL ADDRESS THE COMMISSION.

THE APPLICANT WILL THEN HAVE FINAL OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS ANY REMARKS AND THEN THE PUBLIC MEETING WILL BE CLOSED, AND THEN WE'LL FINALLY VOTE ON IT. I GUESS OUR FIRST PUBLIC HEARING HERE IS ITEM NUMBER NINE. IT'S HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PLAT OF NET ACRE SECTION TWO BEING A REPLAT OF LOT FIVE NET ACRE CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS, GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH LAMESA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 350FT NORTH OF EAST GOLF COURSE ROAD. THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN, COMMISSIONERS PLANNER. TO PRESENT ITEM NINE. ITEM NUMBER NINE IN THE AGENDA IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTED BY CONSULTING FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 202 NORTH LA MESA ROAD, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNIT. THE TOTAL ACREAGE OF THE PROPERTY IS 0.312 ACRES AND IT WILL BE

[00:05:02]

PIDED INTO TWO LOTS. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED SF TWO. THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES ALSO ZONING IS SF TWO. THE CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY IS VACANT LAND. THE USE TO THE NORTH, SOUTH AND WEST ARE ALSO RESIDENTIAL, WHILE THE. THE PROPERTY TO THE EAST IS VACANT LAND. THE PROPOSED USE IS RESIDENTIAL. HERE'S THE SITE ON THE NORTH LAMESA ROAD. LOOKING EAST. THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATES THIS LOCATION AS URBAN RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM. THIS DESIGNATION EMPHASIZES A MIX OF HOUSING STYLES. NO OBJECTIONS WERE RECEIVED. THEREFORE, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS AND I'M OPEN TO ANY QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE ANY. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? NO. SEEING NONE, WE'LL. I GUESS I'LL OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF THIS. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WILLING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS REQUEST? IS THERE ANYONE SPEAKING IN OPPOSITION? SEEING NONE, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND MOVE TO THE BOARD FOR A MOTION. I MOVE FOR APPROVAL. I SECOND. LET'S VOTE. ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? ALL RIGHT, LET'S GO VOTE. MOTION PASSES 5

[10. - Hold a public hearing and consider a Preliminary Plat of Plainsview Estates, Section 2, being a replat of Lot 5, Block 1, Plainsview Estates, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located on the east side of Todd Road, approximately 1,070 feet north of East County Road 77.) (DISTRICT: 2) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) ()]

TO 0. ALL RIGHT. OUR NEXT ITEM IS TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF PLAINVIEW ACRES, SECTION TWO. BEING A REPLAT OF LOT FIVE, BLOCK ONE, PLAINVIEW ESTATES CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF TODD ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1070FT NORTH OF EAST COUNTY ROAD 77. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS PLANNING TO PRESENT ITEM NUMBER TEN. ITEM NUMBER TEN ON THE AGENDA IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTED BY MAVERICK ENGINEERING FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3300 BRAGG DRIVE. TO BE ABLE TO SUBDIVIDE THE RESIDENTIAL LOT INTO TWO. THE TOTAL ACREAGE OF THE PROPERTY IS 3.478 ACRES AND WE PLATTED INTO TWO. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED SF ONE AND AS WELL AS THE PROPERTIES TO THE WEST, THE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH, SOUTH AND EAST ARE ZONED A E. THE CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY IS VACANT LAND. THE USE TO THE NORTH, SOUTH AND EAST ARE VACANT. LAND TO THE WEST IS RESIDENTIAL. THE PROPOSED USE IS RESIDENTIAL. HERE'S THE SITE ON NORTH TOT ROAD. LOOKING EAST. THE FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATES THIS LOCATION AS URBAN RESIDENTIAL LOW. THIS DESIGNATION EMPHASIZES ON A MIX OF HOUSING STYLES. WE DID RECEIVE TWO OBJECTION LETTERS LAST WEEK, RESULTING IN AN 8.32 OBJECTION PERCENTAGE. PROTESTERS VOICED CONCERNS ABOUT THE WATER AVAILABILITY. AVAILABILITY. I DID PUT THE LETTERS ON YOUR DESK. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. I'M OPEN TO ANY QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE ANY. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? SO WHAT DID STAFF ADDRESS THE WATER CONCERN WHENEVER THEY FIRST PLATTED FOR THE PLAINS VIEW THE FIRST SECTION THEY DID COMPLETED THEIR GAC THEIR GRANT. EXCUSE ME. I NEED YOU TO SLOW DOWN AND SPEAK UP, PLEASE. SORRY. WHENEVER THEY FIRST PLATTED THEIR FIRST SUBDIVISION, THEY DID COMPLETE THEIR GROUNDWATER AVAILABILITY CERTIFICATE, WHICH IS BASICALLY WHAT THE LAW AND OUR LOCAL ORDINANCE DESIGNATES. I DID ALSO PUT THE STAPLE CERTIFICATE ON THE BACK OF THOSE LETTERS AS WELL. IT WAS COMPLETED BY A GEOLOGIST, A GEOSCIENTIST THAT IS REGISTERED WITH THE STATE OF TEXAS. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS? WHEN YOU REFER TO THE LETTER, IS THIS THE ONE ON THE BACK? THE ONE DATED ON 25TH? THE WHOLE REPORT FOR THE GAC IS ABOUT 33 PAGES LONG, SO I DIDN'T WANT TO PRINT THE WHOLE REPORT FOR Y'ALL. I JUST PRINTED THE CERTIFICATION AND PUT IT ON THE BACK TO ADDRESS THOSE CONCERNS OVER THE WATER. AND I ALSO HAVE MAVERICK HERE IN CASE THERE'S ANY MORE QUESTIONS FOR THEM. OKAY. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. WE'LL MOVE TOWARDS THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION. IS THERE ANYONE WILLING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE REQUEST? IF YOU CAN COME? BACK, ARE YOU WANTING TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION? YES, SIR. THEN IT WILL BE NEXT. OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. IF YOU'LL STEP UP AND GIVE YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. AND IN THIS REGARD, WE'D LIKE TO KEEP TO THREE MINUTES OR LESS. THANK YOU. OKAY. HI, MY NAME IS KATHERINE ROSMAN AND MY ADDRESS IS 6820 COLONY ROAD, MIDLAND, TEXAS, 79706. THANK YOU. YES. YOU'RE

[00:10:10]

JUST IN FAVOR OF THE REQUEST? YES. OKAY. YOU DON'T HAVE ANY OTHER ADDITIONAL? NO. THE REASON FOR THIS IS REALLY JUST TO SAVE ON COSTS. ENCORE IS ABLE TO ADD AN ADDITIONAL DROP, AND THEN WE HAVE EVENTUALLY WANT TO PUT IN LIKE A COMMUNITY CENTER AND A GUEST HOUSE. AND SO AND A POOL. SO THE CURRENT LIMIT WAS THREE. SO WE JUST FIGURED IT WOULD BE EASIER TO REPLOT RATHER THAN GET ADDITIONAL PERMITS. THANK YOU. YEAH. AND I'M SORRY, IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT I APOLOGIZE YES. OKAY. SO I'M ASHLEY DEVINE. I WORK IN THE SURVEYING DEPARTMENT AT MAVERICK ENGINEERING. AND I'M HERE ALSO REPRESENTING OUR CLIENT. SO THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPLAT, LIKE SHE STATED, WAS FOR AN ENCORE PERMIT IN ORDER TO GET A SEPARATE DROP BOX. THIS REPLAT WAS APPROVED OR THE ORIGINAL PLAT, I'M SORRY, WAS APPROVED, I BELIEVE, OCTOBER OF 2025. AND THAT ONE HAD CREATED THE NINE LOTS. AND THIS PLOT IS JUST SUBDIVIDING ONE OF THE LAST LOTS, SO IT'S NOT CREATING ANY MORE DEVELOPMENT PER THE REPLAT.

IT'S JUST A FORMALITY. AND SO THAT THEY CAN GET THEIR ELECTRIC PERMITS FOR A NEW DROP BOX. SO AND THEY'VE ALREADY, LIKE SHE MENTIONED, BEATRICE, THEY DID DO THE GROUNDWATER STUDY, AND IT'S BEEN APPROVED BY A GEO SCIENTIST THAT THERE'S ENOUGH WATER THERE AND IT'S VERIFIED WITH THE STUDY AND HIS STAMP. HE'S ALREADY DONE THE STUDY. SO IF YOU HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR ME, I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER. THANK THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYBODY IN ADDITION THAT'S IN FAVOR OF THE REQUEST? I WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK. ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE, I'LL ASK IF THERE'S ANYONE IN OPPOSITION TO THE REQUEST YOU CAN COME AND TAKE. THIS IS NEW FOR ME. ME TOO. I'VE NEVER DONE THIS, BUT I INTEND TO BE HEARD SINCE NOBODY ELSE SEEMS TO WANT TO BE HEARD. I LIVE AT 2012 TODD DRIVE. I'VE OWNED THE PROPERTY SINCE 1991. I HAVE WATER WELLS, MY MAJOR, MAJOR, MAJOR CONCERN IS I'VE ALWAYS HEARD THERE'S WATER SOUTH, AND THE FURTHER NORTH YOU GO, THE LESS WATER THERE IS AND YOU GET DOWN TO THE LOOP AND THERE'S NO WATER.

AND I KNOW THAT VEGA DEL PUEBLO OR WHATEVER, THAT SUBDIVISION THAT THEY'VE BUILT OUT THERE HAS NO WATER, AND THEY'RE BEING SUED. THE OWNERS ARE BEING SUED AND THAT YOU ALL ARE PUTTING IN CITY WATER FROM THE LOOP TO THEM. IF WE PUT IN A SWIMMING POOL ON THIS PROPERTY, THAT'S GOING TO TAKE MY GROUNDWATER. I'VE GOT ANIMALS. LOTS OF ANIMALS, ACTUALLY, THAT I LOVE DEARLY. AND I DO NOT WANT MY GROUNDWATER DEPLETED BECAUSE SOME KID WANTS TO SWIM IN A SWIMMING POOL. AND YOU STARTED THE WATER LINE FROM THE LOOP ABOUT A MILE, I HEAR. I'M NOT SURE EXACTLY HOW FAR. AND THEN THERE'S A WATER LINE FROM HIGHWAY 80, BUSINESS 20, WHATEVER YOU WANT TO CALL IT, TO GOLF COURSE. I'M IN BETWEEN. AND THERE'S NO PLAN TO CONNECT THEM. AND IF YOU'RE GOING TO DITCH FROM THE LOOP, JUST KEEP DITCHING. YOU KNOW, IT IS SO MUCH CHEAPER JUST TO DO IT INSTEAD OF HAVING TO DO IT, BRING THE EQUIPMENT OUT, TAKE IT BACK. THAT'S COSTLY. AND I SAY IT THROUGH ALL THE THE DITCHING OF THE SEWER LINES AND STUFF. I THINK YOU NEED TO GET CITY WATER ON THE WHOLE STRETCH OF TOD BEFORE YOU LET THEM PUT IN A SWIMMING POOL. WILL YOU PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD? JUST SO WE HAVE IT. I'M SORRY. WILL YOU PLEASE STATE YOUR NAME IS MARY LOU HARTMAN? THANK YOU. I LIVE AT 2012 TODD DRIVE. PERFECT. THANK YOU. ABOUT 18 ACRES. YEAH. LIKE AT THE VERY END, LIKE. YEAH,

[00:15:05]

THAT'S WHAT I'M SAYING. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE THAT WANTS, LIKE. MY NAME IS RENEE MOLINA, AND I OWN 16 ACRES NORTH OF THE DEVELOPMENT. WOULD YOU MIND PUTTING UP THE, THE PLAT THAT YOU HAVE ON THERE SO WE CAN HELP WITH WILL YOU ALSO GIVE US YOUR ADDRESS JUST FOR THE RECORD AS WELL? YEAH, I LIVE AT 4200 OH ONE TODD, JUST NORTH OF THIS. THANK YOU. SO WHAT IT IS IS THAT WE'RE VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THE WATER ISSUE, AS SOME OF YOU MAY OR MAY NOT KNOW, WE DON'T WANT THE SAME THING THAT'S HAPPENING AT VISTA DEL PUEBLO TO HAPPEN ON THAT ONE SECTION OF TODD. AS MARY LOU EXPLAINED, THERE'S THERE'S MAYBE A MILE OF OF RESIDENTS AND PROPERTY OWNERS THAT WILL BE LEFT OUT WITH THE WATER IF THE LINE IS NOT CONTINUED ALL THE WAY DOWN TO, TO WHERE THE HYDRANT IS AT JUST SOUTH OF GOLF COURSE ROAD. COULD YOU PUT THE OTHER, OTHER AREA, THE OTHER PLOT RIGHT THERE? OKAY, SO THIS IS MARY LOU'S LAND RIGHT HERE. SO SHE'S THE NEIGHBOR JUST TO THE SOUTH OF THE DEVELOPMENT. MATTER OF FACT, I USED TO OWN THIS PROPERTY HERE, BUT I KNOW FOR A FACT THAT TO GO NORTH FROM HERE, THE WATER IS VERY SPOTTY. THERE'S A COUPLE OF PROPERTIES UP. THE GENTLEMAN BOUGHT A SPRINKLER TO WATER AND GRAZED HIS HORSES AND STUFF. AND HE DOESN'T USE IT. WE DRIVE THERE AND HE'S NEVER USING IT BECAUSE THERE'S VERY LITTLE WATER. SO WE'RE NOT AGAINST DEVELOPMENT. DON'T GET IT WRONG, WE ARE FOR DEVELOPMENT. BUT THE CONCERN IS WHY NOT CONTINUE WITH THE WATER LINE ALL THE WAY THROUGH THAT WAY? ALL THESE FOLKS THAT ARE BUILDING HOMES OUT HERE DON'T RUN INTO THE SAME ISSUE THAT WE'RE RUNNING WITH BISHOP TO THE NORTH. AND SOME OF YOU GUYS MAY KNOW OR HAVE MORE DETAILS ON IT, BUT THERE IT'S IT'S A LEGAL ISSUE. THE RESIDENTS REALLY NICE HOMES, VERY EXPENSIVE HOMES. AND NOW THEY DON'T HAVE WATER. SO IF WE START FEEDING WATER TO THESE HOMES HERE, AND I DON'T HAVE THE NUMBERS OF THE GALLONS THAT A TYPICAL HOME USES PER DAY, AND IT'S GOING TO HAPPEN. WHAT MARY LOU JUST STATED, HER WATER TABLE IS GOING TO GO DOWN. THAT'S YOU CAN'T THERE'S NO OTHER EXPLANATION. THE WATER TABLE IS GOING TO RECEDE. AND THEN SHE'LL HAVE PROBLEMS. NOT ONLY WILL SHE BE AFFECTED, ALL THESE FOLKS WILL BE AFFECTED AS WELL. WE HAVEN'T SEEN THE WATER TABLE OR THE THE STUDY THAT WAS MADE. SO WE ASKED, IN ALL FAIRNESS, LET'S TABLE THIS UNTIL WE GET THAT INFORMATION OUT AND MAKE THE WISE, INTELLIGENT DECISION BASED ON FACTS THAT'S IN THE WATER STUDY SOMEWHERE. IF THESE GUYS THAT DID THE WATER STUDY SAYING, YEAH, YOU HAVE PLENTY OF WATER TO GO FOR HOWEVER LONG THE PROJECTION IS MADE AND IT'S NOT GOING TO AFFECT THIS GUY OR MARY LOU OVER HERE. WE'RE ALL FOR IT. WE WANT DEVELOPMENT. WE'RE NOT AGAINST DEVELOPMENT.

ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE LEARNED WHEN WE WERE WE STARTED ASKING QUESTIONS BECAUSE THE INITIAL REQUEST WAS IT WAS STATED EARLIER. WAS THAT. YEAH, BACK A FEW MONTHS AGO, THERE WAS A, A A NOTICE PUT OUT TO CHANGE FROM ANY. THIS WAS A TO SINGLE FAMILY. WE'RE OKAY WITH THAT. WE'RE NOT AGAINST THAT. I JUST WANT TO BE CLEAR ON THAT. IS THAT THREE ALL RIGHT SIR, IT WASN'T NOT TO INTERRUPT, BUT WE HAVE TO KEEP EVERYTHING DOWN TO THREE MINUTES. I'M SORRY. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WOULD SPEAK IN OPPOSITION? WITH THE APPLICANT OR STAFF LIKE TO ADDRESS SOME OF THE CONCERNS MADE. OR QUESTIONS THAT WERE MADE. SO AGAIN, I'M ASHLEY WITH MAVERICK ENGINEERING, AND I JUST KIND OF WANT TO REITERATE THAT THIS PLOT WAS APPROVED AND THIS REPLAT NOW HAS NO EFFECT ON ADDITIONAL, YOU KNOW, WATER BEING USED. THEY CAN BUILD A POOL IF THEY WANT TO. NOW, WHETHER THIS REPLAT GOES OR NOT, SO THAT THE REPLAT JUST DOESN'T REALLY HAVE ANY BEARING ON ANY ADDITIONAL, YOU KNOW, STRAINS ON WATER. IT'S MORE OF A FORMALITY, LIKE I SAID, AND I THINK THAT THEIR CONCERNS ARE MORE GEARED TOWARDS WHEN IS THE CITY GOING TO EXTEND WATER LINES MORE SO THAN THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT. SO I JUST HOPE THAT Y'ALL CAN KEEP THAT IN MIND. IF YOU HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS FOR FOR ASHLEY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. I'LL CLOSE THE AT WHAT STATEMENT, MA'AM. I'M SORRY, I CAN'T. SHE'S A I'M SORRY, BUT UNFORTUNATELY I CAN'T CREATE A PRECEDENT TO WHERE WE COULD JUST HAVE EVERYONE COME UP EVERY SINGLE TIME. SO I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS ONE. AND I GUESS, IS THERE

[00:20:07]

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION THAT WE NEED TO HAVE WITH THE FOR THE FROM THE BOARD? I THINK FOR STAFF LONDON, MAYBE IF YOU CAN ADDRESS SOME OF THE CONCERNS, I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS WAS ALREADY APPROVED AND IT'S JUST NOW THEY NEED THIS FOR ENCORE PERMIT. AND SO YOU SEE THAT THIS. ARE WE HAVING ANY PROBLEMS ON THAT PARTICULAR AREA WITH WATER OR DOES THE STUDY THAT WE HAVE IS SUFFICIENT TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE'S NOT GOING TO BE ANY SITUATIONS WITH BUILDING THE SWIMMING POOL, OR HOW CAN YOU HELP US WITH THAT? SO AS FAR AS THE THE WATER IN THE AREA AS A WHOLE, THE STAFF IN HERE CAN'T SPEAK TO THAT. WE RELY ON THE GSC THAT WAS SUBMITTED, RIGHT. BEATRICE. THE GSC WAS SUBMITTED AND APPROVED. SO WE RELY ON THE EXPERTISE OF THAT CERTIFIED ENGINEER OR GEOSCIENTISTS TO, TO SHOW AND PROVIDE EVIDENCE THAT THERE IS SUFFICIENT WATER. AND IT LOOKS LIKE I'M LOOKING AT THE ENGINEERING COMMENTS RIGHT NOW. IT LOOKS LIKE EVERYTHING HAS BEEN, AS FAR AS THE PRELIM GOES, HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. SO THERE'S NOTHING HERE WE CAN DO AT THE PRELIM. HOWEVER, PERHAPS THE APPLICANT OR MAVERICK CAN ADDRESS SOME OF THOSE CONCERNS IF THEY'RE ABLE. NO. IS THAT OUTSIDE THAT WE'VE CLOSED IT OR IS THAT I THINK YOU YOU ANSWERED YES. MOST OF THE QUESTIONS, BUT I SEE WHAT WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO TELL US IS JUST ABOUT BUILDING A SWIMMING POOL BECAUSE THAT'S, YOU KNOW, REQUIRES THE USE OF WATER. BUT I SEE THE STUDY WAS DONE IN 2025. AND ASSUMING THAT THERE WAS ANOTHER STUDY HAPPENED AFTER THAT OR NO, IT SHOULD STILL BE THE SAME STUDY THAT WOULD BE IN EFFECT. AND I THINK THE MAIN ISSUE IS JUST THAT THEY HAVE THREE STRUCTURES, AND THAT'S THE REAL REASON WHY WE'RE DOING THE REPLAT. IT'S NOT SO MUCH THE SWIMMING POOL BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, THEY CAN PUT A SWIMMING POOL ON ANY OF THOSE LOTS AS IT IS NOW, RIGHT? SO IT'S JUST THE ADDITION THAT THEY HAVE A GUEST HOUSE ON TOP OF ANOTHER STRUCTURE THEY'RE WANTING TO BUILD. AND THAT'S TOO MANY PER THEIR ZONING. SO IT'S MORE OF A STRUCTURE ISSUE THAN A SWIMMING POOL ISSUE. I'D SAY, OKAY, THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. IF THERE'S NO MORE DISCUSSION, I GUESS WE'LL MOVE TOWARDS A VOTE OR A MOTION.

I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. I'LL SECOND. HAVING A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER BARRY AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER MARTIN. WE'LL MOVE TOWARDS THE VOTE. THREE TWO. I WOULDN'T KNOW HOW TO DO THIS ONLY BECAUSE IT'S A THREE AND TWO VOTE. IF IT FAIL, WOULDN'T IT LIKE THREE IN FAVOR? YES. MOTION PASSED. YEAH. YEAH. IF IF IF MORE PEOPLE VOTED IN FAVOR. YES. IT'S A THREE 3 TO 2 VOTE. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THE NEXT ITEM IS. WE'RE ON NUMBER 11 CORRECT? YEAH. ALL RIGHT. THANK

[11. - Hold a public hearing and consider a request by Chase Gardaphe for a Specific Use Designation without Term for a Manufactured Home Park on a 35.05-acre tract of land out of Section 25, Block 39, T-1-S, T&P RR Co Survey, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located on the west side of North Fairgrounds Road, approximately 650 feet north of East Cuthbert Avenue.) (DISTRICT: 2) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

YOU. NUMBER ITEM NUMBER 11 IS HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A REQUEST BY CHASE FOR A SPECIFIC USE DESIGNATION WITHOUT TERM FOR A MANUFACTURED HOME PARK ON A 35.5 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF SECTION 25, BLOCK 39, T-1-STNP. RAILROAD COMMISSION SURVEY. CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF NORTH FAIRGROUNDS ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 650FT NORTH OF EAST CUTHBERT AVENUE. THANK YOU COMMISSIONER. ITEM NUMBER 11, ITEM NUMBER 11 IN THE AGENDA SAYS STUDY SUBMITTED BY CHASE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE

[00:25:02]

WEST SIDE OF NORTH FAIRGROUNDS ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 650FT NORTH OF EAST CUTHBERT AVENUE. TO UPDATE THE EXISTING STUDY. SO BASICALLY, THIS IS THE CURRENT STUDY FROM 2019. I JUST WANTED TO POINT IT OUT. THIS IS THE STUDY THAT FOR THE SITE PLAN THAT IS GOING TO BE UPDATED WITH THE STUDY THAT'S CURRENTLY. AND THIS IS JUST A BRIEF COMPARISON BETWEEN 2019 AND 2016 AND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THEM. THE MAIN DIFFERENCE IS BETWEEN THE SIZE OF THE PROPERTY, WHICH IS THE 49.85 ACRES BETWEEN THE 3505 ACRES ON THE 2019 ONLY HAD ONLY 284 SPACES BETWEEN 263 SPACES. ON THE 2019 STUDY, THE MAX WAS 600 UNITS ON THE CURRENT ONE THAT WE'RE UPDATING IS ONLY HAS A MAX OF 263 UNITS, AND THE DENSITY PER ACRE IS ALSO DIFFERENCE 12 VERSUS THE EIGHT UNITS. I JUST WANTED TO POINT IT OUT BEFORE WE GO AND MOVE ON TO THE DIFFERENT STUFF. THESE ARE THE DETAILS OF THE REQUEST, WHICH BASICALLY IS THE 263 TOTAL SPACES. AND THIS ARE THE BREAKDOWN OF EACH INDIVIDUAL SPACES THAT HE'S REQUESTING.

AND THIS IS THE CURRENT ZONING, THE CURRENT PROPERTY ZONED MF, MH MANUFACTURED HOUSING DISTRICT TO THE NORTH SOUTH IS C COMMERCIAL. TO THE EAST IS A E AND T P INTO THE WEST IS PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT FOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT. THE CURRENT USES VACANT SURROUNDING USES TO THE WEST IS ALSO VACANT. TO THE SOUTH IS COMMERCIAL. TO THE NORTH IS A SENIOR LIVING APARTMENTS. TO THE EAST IS THE ANIMAL SHELTER AND A MANUFACTURED HOME PARK. THE PROPOSED USES A MANUFACTURED HOME PARK. HERE'S A SIDE PHOTO ON NORTH FAIRGROUNDS LOOKING WEST. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. DESIGNATE THIS AREA AS URBAN MEDIUM WOULD. SUPPORT USES INCLUDE A MIX OF HOUSING, HOUSING TYPES ALONG WITH COMMERCIAL, OFFICE AND SERVING USES. THE PROPERTY DID GO THROUGH A ZONE CHANGE BACK IN APRIL. IT CHANGED TO MH MANUFACTURED HOUSING DISTRICT. NO OBJECTIONS WERE RECEIVED. THESE ARE THE CONDITIONS THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING. SHOULD THE COMMISSION APPROVED THE STUDY TODAY, IT WOULD BE APPROVED WITH THE CONDITION THAT THE SITE PLAN BE REVISED TO REFLECT A SECONDARY MEANS OF EGRESS AND INGRESS EGRESS. THAT'S THE ONLY THING THE STAFF IS RECOMMENDING. AND I'M HAPPY TO TAKE ANY QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE ANY. SO IT'S BASICALLY JUST TO REDUCE CAPACITY IN A SENSE AND ADD INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR THE CONDITION THAT WE'RE ADDING THE. YES. YEAH.

JUST ADDING. YEAH. OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. THANK YOU. IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? DO YOU WISH TO SPEAK. CAN YOU OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. OH SORRY. LET'S OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. IS APPLICANT READY? IF YOU'LL STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE.

IT GETS EASIER. I SERVED ON THIS BOARD ALONG WITH LUCY FOR EIGHT YEARS. AND IT'S. MY NAME IS CHASE AND 1320 NORTH FAIRGROUNDS ROAD, 79706. SO I ACTUALLY OWN THE MANUFACTURED HOUSING COMMUNITY DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET. AND THIS IS JUST GOING TO BE A SISTER PROJECT THAT WE WERE ORIGINALLY GOING TO DEVELOP ALL 50 ACRES. WE SOLD OFF. I SOLD OFF ROUGHLY 15 TO IDEA CHARTER SCHOOLS FOR THEM TO BUILD A K THROUGH 12. WE DO HAVE AN EASEMENT THROUGH THEIR PROPERTY FOR ADDITIONAL EGRESS, AND IT JUST ISN'T SHOWN ON THE CURRENT SITE PLAN. OUR ENGINEERS WORKING TO TO GET THAT ADJUSTED. THE SAME WITH FOR DRAINAGE ON THEIR PROPERTY.

THEY HAVE AN EASEMENT DOWN THE SOUTH SIDE OF OUR PROPERTY TO DRAIN INTO THE RETENTION POND.

THIS IS THE EXACT SAME DEVELOPMENT THAT WE WERE APPROVED ON IN 2019. I WAS GETTING READY TO DEVELOP IT AND IT WAS LIKE, WELL, LET'S SEE WHAT THIS WHOLE TWO WEEKS TO LESSEN THE CURVES ABOUT. AND SO NOW WE'RE REVISITING IT POST SELLING THE THE WESTERN 15 ACRES. SO NOW WE'RE GOING TO, YOU KNOW, CONDENSE THE PROPERTY. BUT IN ORDER TO DO THAT, WE HAD TO RE REDO THE SITE PLAN. SO THIS IS THE EXACT SAME. IT'S ACTUALLY LESS BECAUSE WE HAD MULTIPLE CONFIGURATIONS FOR THE LOTS ON THE ORIGINAL DEVELOPMENT. AND NOW WE'RE JUST GOING STRAIGHT SINGLE WIDE AND DOUBLE WIDE LOTS. SO IF YOU GUYS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER. SO ANY QUESTIONS. OKAY. THANK YOU. GOING TO HAVE PARKING SPOTS RIGHT? YES. EVERY EVERY LOT WILL HAVE A 20 BY 20 PARKING PAD ON IT WITH THE ABILITY TO

[00:30:04]

EXTEND FOR A THIRD PARKING STACKED. WELL. THANK YOU. SO. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE REQUEST? SEEING NONE. IS THERE ANYONE WISH TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION? SEEING NONE, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR. I BELIEVE THE CONCERNS THAT WE HAVE PREVIOUSLY WERE ALREADY ADDRESSED ON THIS NEW SITE PLAN, IT LOOKS LIKE. SO I DON'T KNOW IF THE COMMISSIONERS SEE ANYTHING DIFFERENT. I DO I HAVE A MOTION. FOR APPROVAL. HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL FROM COMMISSIONER MARTIN. I'LL SECOND AND A SECOND FROM AND I'M SORRY, YOUR LAST NAME.

THAT'S CORRECT. YOU CAN SAY IT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONERS. YEAH.

LUCY. YOUR VOTE PLEASE. OH, BECAUSE HE DOESN'T CALL FOR A VOTE. SORRY. MOTION PASSES. 5 TO 0. ALL RIGHT. ITEM 12 WAS WAS PULLED. SO WE'LL MOVE TO ITEM NUMBER 13. HOLD A PUBLIC

[13. - Hold a public hearing and consider a Preliminary Plat of Original Town, Section 32, being a replat of the middle 50 feet of Lot 2, Block 73, Original Town, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located on the west side of South Marshall Street, approximately 75 feet north of East Missouri Avenue.) (DISTRICT: 2) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

HEARING TO CONSIDER A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF AN ORIGINAL TOWN. SECTION 32 BEING A REPLAT OF THE MIDDLE 50FT OF LOT TWO, BLOCK 73 ORIGINAL TOWN, CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS.

GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF SOUTH MARSHALL STREET, APPROXIMATELY 75FT NORTH OF EAST MISSOURI AVENUE. THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS. ANGELINA BASSANINI, PLANNER TO PRESENT ITEM 13. ITEM 13 ON THE AGENDA IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTED BY DARREN HENNINGTON FOR A PARCEL LOCATED AT 108 SOUTH MARSHALL, AND WE'RE PLOTTING FOR SOME FUTURE RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION. THE PLOT IS 0.16 ACRES CURRENTLY. NOT A LOT, AND WE'RE GOING TO HAVE ONE PROPOSED LOT. IT IS CURRENTLY ZONED SF THREE WITH ALL SURROUNDING ZONING TO THE NORTH, EAST, SOUTH AND WEST. AS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL CURRENT USE IS VACANT WITH SURROUNDING USES OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING AND A PROPOSED USE OF SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING. HERE'S A SITE PHOTO OF THE PROPERTY ON SOUTH MARSHALL LOOKING WEST. OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOES DESIGNATE THIS AS URBAN MEDIUM, AND STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION. THANK YOU AND I'M OPEN FOR QUESTIONS. I THINK WE'RE GOOD. THANK YOU.

AWESOME. THANK YOU. IS THE APPLICANT. SAY IT AGAIN. SORRY, BUT I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING THEN. AT THAT POINT IS THE APPLICANT WILL PRESENT. WOULD YOU LIKE TO JUST DEFER TO STAFF? THANKS. ALL RIGHT. IS THERE ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE REQUEST? ANYONE OPPOSED? AND I THINK I GUESS WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC, THE PUBLIC HEARING AT THAT POINT.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. DO I HAVE ANY MOTIONS? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.

SECOND, I HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER BERRY TO APPROVE AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER CECILIA. MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO. ALL. ITEM NUMBER 14. HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A

[14. - Hold a public hearing and consider a request by Addis Getahun, on behalf of Lifehouse Fellowship Church for a Specific Use Designation without Term for a Residential Assisted Living Facility on Lot 3A, Block 25, Plantation Hills, Section 23, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located on the east side of Whitman Drive, approximately 350 feet north of Bluebird Lane.) (DISTRICT: 1) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

REQUEST BY ADDIS GETAHUN ON BEHALF OF LIFEHOUSE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH FOR SPECIFIC USE.

DESIGNATION WITHOUT TERM FOR RESIDENTIAL ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY ON LOT THREE, A BLOCK 25 PLANTATION HILLS, SECTION 23 CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF WITTMANN DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 350FT NORTH OF BLUEBIRD LANE. GOOD AFTERNOON, CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS. MADELINE HAWKINS, PLANNER, TO PRESENT ITEM 14. ITEM 14. ON THE AGENDA IS A SPECIFIC USE DESIGNATION WITHOUT TERM SUBMITTED BY ADDIS GETAHUN FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5108 WHITMAN DRIVE TO DEVELOP A RESIDENTIAL ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY. THE PROPOSED DAYS AND HOURS OF OPERATION ARE 24 HOURS SEVEN DAYS A WEEK. THE PROPERTY IS ZONED AGRICULTURAL STATE DISTRICT. THE SURROUNDING ZONING CONSISTS OF AGRICULTURAL ESTATE DISTRICT. THE CURRENT USES VACANT AND. THE SURROUNDING USES CONSIST OF A PARK TO THE NORTH, RESIDENCES TO THE SOUTH, EAST AND WEST. THE PROPOSED USE IS AN ASSISTED

[00:35:06]

LIVING FACILITY. HERE'S A SITE PHOTO ON WHITMAN DRIVE LOOKING EAST. THE LAND USE DESIGNATION IS URLL URBAN RESIDENTIAL LARGE LOT, WHICH SUPPORTS RESTRICTIVE LAND USES, EMPHASIZING HOUSING AND OPEN SPACE. THIS REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE TALL CITY. TOMORROW PLAN. TWO OBJECTIONS WERE RECEIVED, RESULTING IN A 17% OBJECTION PERCENTAGE SUPERMAJORITY VOTE IS NOT REQUIRED, AND PROTESTERS VOICED CONCERNS ABOUT TRAFFIC INCREASE. TWO OBJECTIONS WERE RECEIVED AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION. THANK YOU, AND I'M OPEN TO ANY QUESTIONS. DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEA HOW MANY PEOPLE WOULD BE LIVING AT 16, 16, 16, 16? YES. ONE.

SIX. OKAY, SO NOT A HUGE TRAFFIC. NO. AND I DID ASK THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER THIS MORNING AND HE SAYS THAT HE BELIEVES THIS IS NOT GOING TO INCREASE TRAFFIC. OKAY. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. I'LL GO AHEAD AND OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? YES. I'LL SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT. OKAY. YOU WANT TO COME UP AND. IF YOU'LL STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS TO AS WELL. HELLO. MY NAME IS JACK ODURO. I'M WITH MARIAH BROKERAGE SERVICES AND REPRESENT MY CLIENT ADDIS. I LIVE AT 6002 AURORA WAY, MIDLAND. THE SPECIAL USE DESIGNATION REQUEST IS FOR THE ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY. IT'S NOT GOING TO BE REZONED. IT'S ESSENTIALLY GOING TO STAY THE SAME. BASICALLY, THINK OF A LARGE RESIDENTIAL HOUSE WITH 11 TO 16 ROOMS. MANY OF US HAVE FAMILY MEMBERS THAT ARE PROBABLY IN AN ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY. THESE ARE THE CHILLEST GROUP OF PEOPLE YOU'LL EVER MEET. THAT TRAFFIC IS NOT REALLY GOING TO BE IMPACTED. THEY'RE GOING TO BE ABOUT FIVE EMPLOYEES, AND AT ANY GIVEN TIME, MAYBE 3 TO 5 VISITORS. AND SO THIS WILL NOT REALLY IMPACT TRAFFIC IN THE AREA AT ALL. ADDITIONALLY, THE GOAL OBVIOUSLY IS TO OFFER A LOT MORE FOCUSED CARE AS MY CLIENT, AS A DOCTOR. AND SO THAT WAS ONE OF THE NEEDS THAT WAS RECOGNIZED IN THE COMMUNITY FOR FOCUSED CARE FOR ADULTS IN THE AREA. AND SO THAT'S THE REASON. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS REQUEST? ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO THIS REQUEST? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. IF YOU'LL STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS. MY NAME IS KELLY SIMON, 5211 WHITMAN DRIVE. WE LIVE DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET FROM THIS PROPERTY. THERE'S A TON OF ACTIVITY ON THAT ROAD FROM 1:00 DURING SCHOOL YEAR. IT IS STARTING AT 1:00 PM. THERE ARE CARS LINED UP ALL THE WAY THROUGH TO THE TURNING LANE UNTIL 330. SO 2.5 HOURS CARS ARE LINED UP ACROSS THE STREET FROM OUR HOUSE. WE DO NOT WANT ANY MORE TRAFFIC ACROSS THE STREET. ALSO, WITH IT BEING AN ASSISTED LIVING, THE HAVING A AMBULANCE, FIRE TRUCKS, THE NOISE I. WE JUST DON'T WANT IT. SO WE ARE DEFINITELY AGAINST IT.

THAT PROPERTY HAS BEEN FOR SALE MULTIPLE TIMES. THEY HAVEN'T BEEN ABLE TO BUILD ANYTHING ON IT. I WOULD HAVE RATHER A CHURCH THAN THIS THAN THE ASSISTED LIVING THAT WAS ORIGINALLY WANTING TO BE PUT IN THERE. SO WE ARE DEFINITELY AGAINST IT. AND I KNOW THAT OTHER NEIGHBORS ARE AS WELL. I WISH THAT A LOT OF THEM COULDN'T BE HERE. THEY'RE ALL OUT OF TOWN. SO ANYWAYS, THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE THAT WANTS TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION? HI, I'M GINA MARTIN. TROY MARTIN, WE LIVE AT 2604 BLUEBIRD, WHERE THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY WITH THIS CHURCH, WE ACTUALLY OWN THIS LAND AND SOLD IT FOR A CHURCH TO BUILD A CHURCH ON. SO NOW THEY'VE OUR MAIN CONCERN IN THE AREA. IT'S VERY, VERY MUCH TRAFFIC. I MEAN, TERRIBLE TRAFFIC. NOT FOR US ON BLUEBIRD AS MUCH AS ON WHITMAN, BUT OUR MAIN CONCERN WAS RESIDENTIAL OR THEY WANT TO PUT IN A ASSISTED LIVING. WE JUST

[00:40:06]

WANTED TO MAKE SURE IT WASN'T GOING TO BE ANYTHING ABOVE A ONE STORY BUILDING, BECAUSE OUR BACKYARD IS 100FT FROM THE FENCE LINE, SO WE DIDN'T QUITE UNDERSTAND WHAT THEIR BUILDING PLAN WAS. ANYTHING ELSE YOU WANT TO ADD? NO. WHAT? THE LADY BEFORE US SPOKE ABOUT THE PICKUP TRAFFIC AT THE END OF SCHOOL. SHE SAID, IT BEGINS AT ONE. I NOTICED IT AT 2:00. I DON'T ANYWAY, DOES IT LIKE PEOPLE HAVE NOTHING ELSE TO DO BUT SIT IN THEIR CAR FOR TWO HOURS TILL SCHOOL LETS OUT. BUT THAT LINE OF TRAFFIC LINES ALL THE WAY ACROSS WHITMAN, IT WRAPS AROUND THE CORNER ACROSS BLUEBIRD, WHICH IS THE FRONT OF OUR HOUSE AND ALL THE WAY TO GARFIELD. YES, MA'AM. THE PICKUP TRAFFIC IS INSANE. HONESTLY, I DON'T SEE HOW THAT'S A GOOD ARRANGEMENT FOR ANY BUSINESS GOING IN PLACE THERE. WHY THEY'RE CONSIDERING PUTTING IT THERE DOESN'T SEEM LIKE A GOOD DECISION TO ME BECAUSE OF THE PICKUP TRAFFIC WITH THE SCHOOL ITSELF. BUT OUR PERSONAL CONCERN IS OUR PRIVACY IN OUR BACK YARD AND INTO OUR HOUSE, BECAUSE OUR BACK BACK OF OUR HOUSE IS WINDOWS AND WE DON'T REALLY WANT MULTIPLE STORIES STARING INTO OUR HOUSE. SO THAT'S OUR CONCERN. OKAY. THANK YOU. DOES THE APP DO YOU WANT TO ADDRESS SOME OF THE CONCERNS THAT. I GET ON? I AM THE DEVELOPER. SO I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY, IT'S NOT A NURSING HOME. IT'S NOT A BIG ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY. IT'S MORE RESIDENTIAL SENIOR LIVING. IT'S ONLY FOR 16 PEOPLE MAXIMUM. WE CANNOT GO BEYOND THAT BECAUSE OF THE TEXAS HEALTH DEPARTMENT CRITERIA AND THE SENIORS. OF COURSE, THEY WILL NOT PROBABLY DO DRIVING, SO THEY WILL NOT HAVE LIKE 16 CARS THERE. SO WE'LL HAVE MAXIMUM 4 TO 5 EMPLOYEES. SO IT'S NOT GONNA AFFECT THE TRAFFIC. DEFINITELY. I CHOSE THAT PLACE BECAUSE OF ACTUALLY I THOUGHT IT'S MORE RESIDENTIAL AND IT'S GOOD FOR THE SENIORS. SO AND IT'S NOT GOING TO BE A MULTI STORY. IT'S GOING TO BE ONLY A BIG HOUSE, ABOUT 6500 ACRES AT MAXIMUM.

YEAH. I'M SORRY. NO YOU'RE FINE, I UNDERSTAND THAT. COULD YOU REPEAT THAT LAST PART. IT'S GOT THE SIZE IS GOING TO BE 6500FT■. IT'S NOT IT'S ONE STORY HOUSE. YEAH. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. I'LL CLOSE THE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT THIS TIME. IS THERE ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION OR FURTHER DISCUSSION? IS THAT THE SITE PLAN THE ONE THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT? YES. OKAY. AND IT'S SO I UNDERSTAND THE CONCERN ABOUT THE MULTI STOREY BUILDING AND THE APPLICANT SAYING THAT IT'S ONLY GOING TO BE ONE STORY. THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE CAN VOTE ON IT. AND PUT ALSO A CONDITION. THE SUD IS ALREADY ATTACHED TO THE SITE PLAN. SO IF THEY WANT TO DO ANYTHING DIFFERENT THEY HAVE TO COME BACK. OKAY. I THINK IF P AND Z WANTS TO MAKE THAT MOTION THAT IT BE APPROVED WITH THE CONDITION THAT IT BE LIMITED TO A ONE STORY, I THINK THAT WE WOULD THAT WOULD THAT WOULD BE OKAY TO DO THAT. OKAY. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR DISCUSSION? IN THE MOTION? ARE WE READY TO DO THAT? I MEAN, IF THERE'S NO MORE DISCUSSION, WE CAN MOVE TOWARDS THAT PORTION. I MOVE FOR APPROVAL, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS INDICATED AND DISCUSSED HERE. DO WE WANT TO ADD THE CONDITION TO MAKE IT A ONE STORY? YES. YOU A OKAY. I MEAN, YOU CAN IF YOU WANT TO. SO OKAY. YOU WANT TO REPEAT THAT? YEAH. JUST REPEAT YOUR MOTION THEN WITH I RECOMMEND THAT WE APPROVE IT SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS INDICATED. AND ESPECIALLY I HAVE A SINGLE STORY BUILDING APPLIED FOR THE.

OKAY. I HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER MARTIN TO APPROVE IT WITH THE CONDITIONS LAID OUT, AS WELL AS ADDING A CONDITION THAT WOULD KEEP MAXIMIZE IT TO ONE STORY BUILDING. DO I HAVE A

[00:45:01]

SECOND? I'LL SECOND HAVE A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER LAFOY. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? I WOULD JUST LIKE, I BELIEVE. WOULD THAT BE OKAY FOR SOME PEOPLE? BECAUSE THAT WAS ONE OF THE BIGGEST CONCERNS. CORRECT. TO HAVE ONE STORY BUILDING TO MAKE SURE THAT, OKAY, THAT'S ALL RIGHT. NO MORE QUESTIONS. WE HAVE THE MOTION. AND A SECOND. LET'S LET'S CALL FOR THE VOTE. MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO. ALL. MAKE SURE I HAVE MY LIST HERE. THANK YOU. 15. ALL RIGHT. 15 HAS BEEN PULLED. SO IS 16 AND 17. SO WE'LL MOVE TO ITEM NUMBER 18. LET ME GET

[18. - Motion approving, with staff’s recommended conditions, a Preliminary Plat of Bizzell Kiser Addition, Section 12, being a replat of Lots 1A and 11A, Block 10 and Lots 1A and 2A, Block 7, Bizzell-Kiser Addition, Section 4, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located on the south side of East Peck Avenue, approximately 530 feet west of South Terrell Street.) (DISTRICT: 2) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

THERE REAL QUICK. ALL RIGHT. MOTION APPROVING WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS. A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF KAISER ADDITION SECTION 12 BEING A REPLAT OF LOTS ONE A AND 11 A BLOCK TEN AND LOTS ONE A AND TWO A BLOCK SEVEN BYCEL KAISER ADDITION SECTION FOUR, CITY AND COUNTY OF TEXAS, GENERALLY LOCATED GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF EAST PECK AVENUE, APPROXIMATELY 530FT WEST OF SOUTH TERRELL. AFTERNOON. CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS. PLANNER LAURIE ELLIOTT TO PRESENT ITEM 18. ITEM 18 ON THE AGENDA IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTED BY BACKROOM CONSULTING FOR THE PROPERTY AT 2305 SOUTH FORT WORTH STREET IN DISTRICT TWO. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO PLAT FIVE LOTS INTO ONE IN ORDER TO EXPAND THE CHURCH PROPERTY. THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT. ALL SURROUNDING PROPERTIES ARE ZONED PD FOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AS WELL. PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY A CHURCH AND WILL REMAIN SO. THE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH ARE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES AND VACANT LOTS TO THE SOUTH, EAST AND WEST ARE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. SHOWN HERE IS A SITE PHOTO OF THE PROPERTY FROM SOUTH FORT WORTH STREET. LOOKING SOUTH. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATES THIS AREA AS URBAN, MEDIUM AND THE SUPPORTED USES ARE MIXES OF COMPLEMENTARY USES TO INCLUDE SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING, MULTIFAMILY SCHOOLS AND CHURCHES. WE DO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHOWN HERE. HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE.

THANK YOU. YES, SIR. IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? OH, SORRY. LET ME OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? THIS IS A MISCELLANEOUS. IT DOESN'T GET OPEN. I'M SORRY. YEAH, SORRY. SO YEAH THE PUBLIC IS. YES. YEAH. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF OR FOR ANYONE. ALL RIGHT. I'LL CALL FOR A MOTION. MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. SECOND HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE FROM COMMISSIONER BARRY AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER SISNIEGA. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL RIGHT. LET'S VOTE. MOTION. MOTION PASSES, 5 TO 0. ALL RIGHT. ITEM

[19. - Motion approving, with staff's recommended conditions, a Preliminary Plat of Westridge Park Addition, Section 61, being a replat of a 4.497-acre tract of land out of Lot 10, Block 7, Westridge Park Addition, Section 39, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located on the north side of Deauville Boulevard, approximately 285 feet west of Griffith Drive.) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) () ]

19 ON THE AGENDA IS MOTION APPROVING WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS. A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF WESTRIDGE PARK ADDITION SECTION 61 BEING A REPLAT OF A 4.497 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF LOT SEVEN, LOT TEN, BLOCK SEVEN, WESTRIDGE PARK ADDITION, SECTION 39, CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF DEAUVILLE BOULEVARD, APPROXIMATELY 285FT WEST OF GRIFFITH DRIVE. THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS.

ANGELINA BASTIANINI, PLANNER TO PRESENT ITEM 19, ITEM 19 ON THE AGENDA IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTED BY MAVERICK ENGINEERING FOR A PROPERTY THAT IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF DEAUVILLE. WE'RE PLANNING FOR FUTURE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT IS 4.497 ACRES. THERE IS CURRENTLY ONE LOT AND WE'RE GOING TO HAVE ONE LOT PROPOSED. THE CURRENT ZONING IS REGIONAL RETAIL. ALL SURROUNDING ZONING IS A PD PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR SHOPPING CENTER.

THE LAND USE IS CURRENTLY VACANT. LAND SURROUNDING TO THE NORTH AND WEST IS VACANT. LAND TO THE EAST IS VACANT. LAND IN A SCHOOL AND TO THE SOUTH IS AN OFFICE BUILDING. THE PROPOSED USE IS AN INDOOR AMUSEMENT AND RESTAURANT. LAND DESIGNATION IS URBAN HIGH STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITION. THANK YOU. I'M OPEN FOR ANY QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? NO. ALL RIGHT. I MAKE A MOTION. I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM NUMBER

[00:50:03]

19. I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE FROM COMMISSIONER SISNIEGA. A SECOND AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER LAFOY. ANY OTHER FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL RIGHT, LET'S VOTE. MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO. ALL RIGHT. NEXT ITEM IS NUMBER 20. MOTION APPROVING WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDED

[20. - Motion approving, with staff’s recommended conditions, a Preliminary Plat of Highland Park Extension, Section 3, being a 5.32-acre tract of land out of section 27, Block 39, T-1-S, T&P RR Co. Survey, City and County of Midland, Texas (Generally located at the northeast corner of the intersection of West Louisiana Avenue and N Street) (DISTRICT: 3) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE) ]

CONDITIONS. A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF HIGHLAND PARK EXTENSION, SECTION THREE BEING A 5.32 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF SECTION 27, BLOCK 39, T-1-S, T AND P RAILROAD COMMISSION SURVEY.

CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF WEST LOUISIANA AVENUE AND N STREET. GOOD AFTERNOON COMMISSIONERS MADELINE HAWKINS, PLANNER TO PRESENT ITEM 20. ITEM 20. ON THE AGENDA IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTED BY MAVERICK ENGINEERING ON BEHALF OF MIDLAND ISD FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2000 WEST LOUISIANA AVENUE. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO PLOT 5.32 ACRES INTO ONE LOT. THE PROPERTY IS ZONED AS OF TWO SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT. THE SURROUNDING ZONING CONSISTS OF. CONSISTS OF SF 201 AND SF ONE. THE CURRENT USE IS AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AND THE SURROUNDING USES CONSIST OF A STADIUM TO THE NORTH, RESIDENTIAL TO THE EAST AND SOUTH, AND A CHURCH TO THE WEST. THE LAND USE DESIGNATION IS SCHOOL. UNIVERSITY, WHICH SUPPORTS EDUCATIONAL, PUBLIC, PRIVATE AND PAROCHIAL. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF. WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITION. THANK YOU AND I'M OPEN TO ANY QUESTIONS. ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. FURTHER DISCUSSION OR I'LL TAKE MOTIONS. MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE FROM COMMISSIONER SANTIAGO. SECOND AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER MARTIN. IF THERE'S NO FURTHER DISCUSSION, WE'LL MOVE TO THE VOTE. MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO AND ITEM 21 WAS PULLED. AND I BELIEVE THAT CONCLUDES OUR MEETING. WE'

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.

OPENING ITEMS

CONSENT AGENDA

Jun 15, 2026 Planning and Zoning

OPENING ITEMS

CONSENT AGENDA

Jun 15, 2026 Planning and Zoning

Link

Social

Embed

Download

Download Selected Item