Link


Social

Embed


Download

Download
Download Transcript

[00:00:01]

US. GOOD AFTERNOON. I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND CALL TODAY'S MEETING FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO ORDER. THE FIRST ITEM ON OUR AGENDA IS THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. SO IF YOU WILL, PLEASE STAND WITH ME. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. HONOR THE TEXAS FLAG. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THEE. TEXAS. ONE STATE UNDER GOD, ONE AND INDIVISIBLE. THANK YOU. NEXT ON TODAY'S AGENDA IS OUR PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD.

DURING THIS TIME, WE WILL RECEIVE COMMENTS FROM MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO DESIRE TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGARDING ITEMS ON THE CONSENT AGENDA FOR WHICH PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL NOT BE HELD. IS THERE ANYONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK AT THIS TIME?

[CONSENT AGENDA]

OKAY. SEEING NONE, I WILL MOVE ON TO OUR CONSENT AGENDA. ITEMS TWO AND THREE. IS THERE ANYTHING THAT NEEDS TO BE PULLED FOR DISCUSSION SEPARATELY? ALL RIGHT THEN, I'LL ENTERTAIN MOTIONS. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA. I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA FROM COMMISSIONER SISNIEGA. SECOND.

AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON. LET'S VOTE. MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU.

[4. - Hold a public hearing and consider a request by Davis Hord, on behalf of Dan Hord, for a Zone Change from SF-1, Single-Family Dwelling District to AE, Agricultural Estate District on a on 8.959- acre tract of land out of Section 10, Block X, H.P. Hilliard Survey, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located on the west of Breckenridge Drive, approximately 175 feet south of Durango Drive.) (DISTRICT: 1) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND P]

NEXT WILL BE OUR PUBLIC HEARINGS. OUR PROCEDURE FOR CONDUCTING PUBLIC HEARINGS IS AS FOLLOWS. FIRST, STAFF WILL PRESENT ITS EVALUATION OF THE REQUEST. THEN APPLICANTS WILL PRESENT THE REQUEST OR RESPOND TO ANY QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS FROM MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.

NEXT, THOSE WISHING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE REQUEST WILL ADDRESS THE COMMISSION. THEN, THOSE WHO ARE OPPOSED TO THE REQUEST OR THOSE WHO WISH FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL ADDRESS THE COMMISSION. THE APPLICANT WILL THEN HAVE A FINAL OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS ANY REMARKS FROM THE PUBLIC. THE PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL THEN BE CLOSED. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC WILL BE HEARD ONLY IF A MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION DESIRES TO DIRECT A QUESTION, EITHER TO THE APPLICANT OR A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC. FINALLY, THE COMMISSION WILL CONSIDER ALL OF THE INFORMATION PRESENTED AND VOTE ON THE MATTER. TODAY'S FIRST PUBLIC HEARING IS ITEM NUMBER FOUR. HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST BY DAVIS HOARD ON BEHALF OF DAN HOARD FOR A ZONE CHANGE FROM SF ONE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT TO A E AGRICULTURAL ESTATE DISTRICT ON AN 8.959 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF SECTION TEN, BLOCK XHP HILLIARD SURVEY. CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF BRECKENRIDGE DRIVE, APPROXIMATELY 175FT SOUTH OF DURANGO DRIVE. THANK YOU.

CHAIRMAN, COMMISSIONERS. SENIOR PLANNER. TO PRESENT ITEM NUMBER FOUR. ITEM NUMBER FOUR ON THE AGENDA IS SUBMITTED BY DAVIS ON BEHALF OF DAN FORD FOR THE PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST INTERSECTION OF BRECKENRIDGE DRIVE AND WOODLAND PARK AVENUE TO ALLOW THE USE OF THE PROPERTY AS HORSE GRAZING AND LAND CULTIVATION. THE CURRENT ZONING IS SF ONE. TO THE NORTH. WE HAVE SF TWO TO THE EAST. WE HAVE A PD FOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT TO THE WEST AND SOUTH WE HAVE SF ONE. THE PROPOSED USES E. THE CURRENT USE IS VACANT LAND. THE USE TO THE NORTH, SOUTH AND WEST ARE ALSO VACANT. LAND TO THE EAST IS RESIDENTIAL. THE PROPOSED USE. AGRICULTURE AND PASTURE. HERE'S THE SIDE ON BRECKENRIDGE DRIVE. LOOKING WEST. THE COMPREHENSIVE DESIGNATES THIS AREA AS URBAN RESIDENTIAL LOW, WHICH DOES ENCOURAGE RESTRICTIVE LAND USE AND EMPHASIZES IN SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. WE HAVE RECEIVED TWO OBJECTION LETTERS FROM THE PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN THE 200 FOOT BUFFER, AS WELL AS SEVERAL OBJECTIONS FROM OUTSIDE THE NOTIFICATION AREA, AND AS WELL THE EMAIL FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE ZONE CHANGE, WHICH RESULTED IN AN 86% REJECTION FOR THE OBJECTION FOR THE ZONE CHANGE.

THOSE IN A POSITION VOICE CONCERNS ABOUT HOW THE PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE MAY NEGATIVELY IMPACT THE ORDERLY GROWTH OF THE SURROUNDING AREA. LIKE I SAID, THERE WERE TWO OBJECTIONS RECEIVED. THEREFORE, STAFF NEITHER APPROVES NOR RECOMMENDS APPROVE THIS REQUEST FOR A CHANGE FOR SF 1 TO 80, AND I'M OPEN TO ANY QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE ANY. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? ARE THERE ANY OTHER PRECEDENTS FOR THIS TYPE OF REQUEST BEING APPROVED

[00:05:04]

IN THE PAST? I DO NOT BELIEVE SO. BUT. I DON'T RECALL ANY OF THE TOP OF MY HEAD EITHER. YEAH.

IS IS THAT WHY YOU'RE NOT MAKING A RECOMMENDATION? IS BECAUSE YOU JUST DON'T HAVE ANY PRECEDENT. OH, WELL, ELIZABETH, FEEL FREE TO CHIME IN TO ADD ANYTHING YOU'D LIKE, BUT I THINK FOR US, YOU COULD ARGUE EITHER WAY, IS WHY YOU COULD ARGUE THAT ON ONE HAND, IT IS JUST A PASS THROUGH. IT'S VERY LOW IMPACT, LOW INTENSITY. ON THE OTHER HAND, IT IS AGAINST THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BEING THAT IT DOES CALL FOR A SINGLE FAMILY. SO BECAUSE OF THAT KIND OF MIDDLE GROUND, THAT'S WHY WE'RE TAKING THE STANCE WE ARE. THERE'S SEEMS TO BE A CONFLICT BETWEEN WHAT WHAT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SAYS AND WHAT MIGHT NECESSARILY BE ALLOWED. CORRECT. WHILE ALSO, YOU KNOW, IT IS AT THE SAME TIME, YOU KNOW, IT IS A LOW IMPACT, LOW INTENSITY USE. SO YOU COULD ARGUE EITHER WAY. OKAY. I UNDERSTAND, ELIZABETH, WERE YOU LOOKING TO SAY SOMETHING? OKAY. NO, LANDON HAD IT. IN THESE KINDS OF CASES, IT'S DIFFICULT. THERE'S DEFINITELY AN ARGUMENT TO BE MADE FOR. BUT THERE'S ALSO AN ARGUMENT TO BE MADE AGAINST. OKAY. THANK YOU. SO THE WOULD YOU SAY IT IS 86% OBJECTION? YES. THERE'S THE EMAILS. YES. THE PROPERTY JUST WEST OF THE PROPERTY. IT'S OVER 23 ACRES, WHICH MADE THE MAJORITY OF THAT 86%, WHICH WAS ABOUT LIKE 80 SOMETHING PERCENT. OKAY. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF AT THIS TIME? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU.

BEATRICE. ALL RIGHT. I WILL OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING. IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? WOULD YOU LIKE TO COME SPEAK? SURE. YOU CAN HAND THAT TO TO STAFF AND WE'LL GET THAT ON RECORD.

AND IF YOU WOULDN'T MIND SAYING YOUR NAME AND YOUR ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. DAVIS WARD, 1306 WEST MISSOURI AVENUE. I MEAN, LIKE THEY SAID, IT'S IT'S WE HAVE NO LONG TERM PLAN FOR IT, BUT WE WERE JUST TRYING TO GIVE THE, THE PROPERTY LIFE UNTIL THERE IS A PLAN. AND SO WE WEREN'T PUTTING ANY BUILDINGS OR ANYTHING, JUST JUST FENCING AND GIVING IT USE AND, AND THE PROCESS OF HORSES GRAZING ON IT KEEPS IT RELATIVELY CLEAN, BETTER THAN IT BEING OVERGROWN.

WE GOT A NOTICE FROM THE CITY TO, TO GO AND CLEAN IT UP. AND SO IT WAS, IT WAS THE NEXT USE IS TO CLEAN IT UP, FENCE IT IN AND AND GIVE IT LIFE UNTIL THERE'S ANOTHER USE FOR IT. DO YOU PLAN ON KEEPING THEM THERE 24 HOURS A DAY, SEVEN DAYS A WEEK? NO. SO THE THE SEASON OUT THERE. THE POLO CLUB IS SOUTH OF IT. SOUTH OF THE DRAW. AND SO THE 8 TO 8 WEEK SEASONS. SO 16 WEEKS A YEAR AT NIGHT THEY PUT THEM OUT THERE. AND THEN DURING THE DAY THEY USUALLY BRING THEM IN STALLS AND THEY'RE USED OR RIDDEN OR WHATEVER, AND THEN TURNED BACK OUT AT NIGHT. SO IT'S MINIMAL USE. OKAY. DO YOU KNOW HOW MANY HORSES? NOT SURE. NOT NOT A TON.

NOT NOT DOZENS. NO NO NO NO. NOT MORE THAN WHAT YOU WOULD YOU WOULDN'T WANT TO OVERGRAZE IT. HOW HOW MANY HORSES PER ACRE IS USUALLY RECOMMENDED? I DON'T KNOW, I DON'T KNOW FOR SURE, BUT I WOULDN'T PUT MORE THAN 15 OR 20. IT IS EIGHT ACRES AND WE. WE HAVE PROBABLY MORE THAN THAT ON ON SOME OF OUR EIGHT ACRE TRACTS. AND THAT THAT'S GRASS THAT WE, WE HAVE COASTAL ON THERE OR BERMUDA. AND SO IT CAN SUPPORT MORE THAN THE NATIVE GRASS THAT'S THERE.

BUT NOT A TON. BUT I'M NOT I'M NOT POSITIVE ON WHAT THE LIKE HORSE PER ACRE RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE. OKAY. YOU SAID THAT THE CITY RECENTLY MADE YOU. WELL, THERE'S ACTUALLY A CONFUSING. OUR MARK PAYNE OWNS THE PROPERTY TO THE LEFT, BUT THE CARD STILL SHOWS THAT IT'S US. FOR SOME REASON WE DON'T OWN IT. AND THAT'S REALLY WHAT THE RECOMMENDATIONS WERE FOR THAT AREA TO BE CLEANED UP. BUT THE THE GREEN, THE EIGHT ACRES IS OWNED BY US AND IT WAS PREVIOUSLY ALREADY MOWED DOWN. AND SO IT WASN'T. BUT ANYWAYS, SOMEBODY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD WANTED IT TO BE CLEANED UP. AND SO IT GAVE US ANOTHER EXCUSE TO GO AND GIVE IT SOME ATTENTION.

SO WE WENT AND PICKED UP TRASH THAT HAD BEEN ON THIS FOR A WHILE AND JUST NOT DONE IT OR NO, WE PROBABLY OWNED IT FOR 3 TO 5 YEARS. I DON'T REMEMBER EXACTLY WHEN WE BOUGHT IT, BUT

[00:10:07]

I MEAN, THERE'S NO REASON TO GO OVER THERE. SO WE DIDN'T CHECK IT OUT. BUT PEOPLE, I THINK, OCCASIONALLY COME AND DROP TRASH FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD, JUST DUMP IT ON THERE BECAUSE IT'S EMPTY AND IT'S NOT FENCED IN. SO IT'S EASY FOR PEOPLE TO GO IN. AND YOU LOOK AT THE PROPERTY AROUND IT TO PEOPLE JUST GO DUMP. THERE'S A DRAW TO THE SOUTH OF THAT AND THERE'S, THERE'S JUNK ALL OVER THERE. AND IF IF THERE'S NO REASON TO GO OVER THERE, I WOULDN'T NOTICE THAT THERE'S A WASHING MACHINE THERE. SO WE WENT INSIDE OUR EIGHT ACRES, WENT AND PICKED UP THE TRASH AS A WAY TO GO AND CHECK AND HORSES ROAM HERE WITHOUT BEING HURT.

SO WE DID. SO IT'S CLEAN NOW. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? I GUESS JUST RIGHT NOW HOW FAR IS IT FROM STABLES OR WHERE OTHER HORSES ARE CURRENTLY PRESENT? WHAT IS THAT, LIKE A COUPLE HUNDRED FEET? IT'S NO MORE THAN A FIVE MINUTE WALK. SO THEY'RE ALREADY KIND OF IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. OKAY. YEAH, IT'S IT'S RIGHT JUST SOUTH OF THE RED BORDER. YEAH.

SO YOU CAN SEE THE GREEN AT THE BOTTOM, THE GRASS THAT'S THE EDGE OF THE, THE POLO CLUB PROPERTY. AND RIGHT ACROSS THE FENCE THERE'S HORSES JUST RIGHT UNDER THE MIDLAND. AND THE THE ENERGY SIGN IS, IS THAT THE DRAW THERE? THAT IT'S NOT A DRAW, BUT IT'S LIKE, IT'S LIKE A IT'S LIKE A MANUFACTURER. IT STOPS AND ENDS RIGHT THERE. LIKE THE WATER'S NOT FLOWING THROUGH THERE. THE ACTUAL FLOODPLAIN GOES SOUTH AND GOES THROUGH THAT. SORRY. OKAY. IT GOES THROUGH HERE, BUT THIS IS ALL BURNED UP INTO THE FLOODPLAIN ACTUALLY COMES THIS WAY DOWN. WHEN WE WHEN WE BUILT THIS, WE GOT THE CITY TO AGREE THAT THAT WE WERE ADDING THIS FIELD, ADDING STORAGE INTO THE FLOODPLAIN. SO WHEN THE FLOODPLAIN COMES, IT FILLS UP HERE FIRST BEFORE GOING INTO A PLACE. AND SO THIS, THIS ISN'T TECHNICALLY THE FLOODPLAIN, BUT IT IS A, A PIT, I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE WORD IS. AND THAT THAT GREEN IS THE POLO FIELDS. RIGHT.

YES. OKAY. YES. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. THERE'S THERE'S SEVEN HORSES TURNED OUT THERE RIGHT NOW, SO. OKAY. SEVEN HORSES RIGHT I GUESS. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS REQUEST? SEEING NONE, IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO IS OPPOSED OR WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION I DO HAVE? A MR. MARK PAYNE. WOULD YOU LIKE TO COME SPEAK? MY NAME IS MARK PAYNE. I LIVE AT 912 ALAMOSA COURT, MIDLAND, TEXAS 79705. I GUESS I COULD ANSWER SOME OF THE QUESTIONS IN BETWEEN. TO THE EAST OF IT, THERE WAS JUST A STRIP OF GROWTH THAT WAS THERE THAT NEEDED TO BE CLEANED UP. AND I THINK ALL OF US HAD GOTTEN NOTICE TO CLEAN OUR MOWING AROUND IT. AND I THINK THEY DID A GOOD JOB OF GETTING THAT CLEANED UP PRETTY QUICK. THE DRAW BELOW IS A WELL, THAT'S A DRAINAGE, AN OLD DRAINAGE PLAN. SO I GUESS MY BIGGEST CONCERNS WITH WITH THE PROPOSAL, ESPECIALLY IF IT'S ON A PERMANENT PERMANENT BASIS. VISIT WITH THEM A LITTLE FURTHER. YOU KNOW, WOODLAND PARK HAS BEEN IN LIMBO BECAUSE THERE'S A COUPLE OF FACTORS IN IT. AND I'M GOING TO BLOW THREE MINUTES IF I GET TOO DETAILED. BUT I'LL JUST START WITH MY PRIMARY OBJECTIONS AND THEN Y'ALL CAN. MY OBJECTION IS THAT IT'S A ZONE CHANGE LIKE THIS TO.

AS YOU CAN SEE, THE CLUBHOUSE IS RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET FROM THIS CATTY CORNER. AND WE CAME IN AND ABOUT 20 YEARS AGO, YEARS AGO WITH A MASTER PLAN, TELL THEM WHAT THE PLAN WAS FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD. AND AT THAT TIME THAT WAS A SCHOOL SITE, IS WHAT IT WAS. SO IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL THERE. OVER TEN YEARS LATER OR SO, IT BECAME CLEAR THAT THE SCHOOL SYSTEM WAS NOT GOING TO BUILD IT THERE. IT WAS ALWAYS JUST ASSUMED IT WOULD REVERT BACK TO THE SF ONE. SO IT THE PEOPLE OUT THERE DIDN'T EXPECT A PASTURE ON THAT CORNER. AND I DON'T. SO THAT BEING THE CASE, YOU KNOW, IF THE ZONING WAS TRULY. I DON'T THINK THAT'S THE INTENT IN THE SENSE OF LIKE, WE WANT TO REZONE IT AND BUILD HOUSES THERE. I THINK IT'S MORE THAN JUST ALLOWS YOU TO HAVE ANIMALS ON IT. YOU KNOW, IF IT WAS A, IF THEY WERE TRYING TO TAKE IT TO A E, I THINK MAYBE YOU COULD DIVIDE IT UP AND MAKE SOMETHING THAT WAS, WAS WORK.

[00:15:01]

IT CERTAINLY WOULDN'T BE SOMETHING I WOULD RECOMMEND PUTTING IN THAT LOCATION IN A SUBDIVISION. SO. YOU KNOW, I WOULD QUESTION WHAT IT IS, IS WHETHER IT'S, IT'S REALLY A PASTURE IS WHAT IT IS. IT'S NOT, THERE'S NO INTENT TO BUILD HOME SITES THERE. AND E AGRICULTURAL ESTATES IS WHAT E STANDS FOR. AND I WOULD QUESTION WHETHER I MEAN, I WAS PROBABLY THE ONE THAT BROUGHT UP THE ZONING DOESN'T ACCOMMODATE IT. AND I DO KNOW THAT UNIMPROVED PROPERTY TO AVOID ADD TAXES I CAN I COULD HAVE CATTLE OUT THERE GRAZING ON SOME ACREAGE I EARN FOR THE KIND IN THE NORTH WEST CORNER. I DON'T THINK THE ASSOCIATION IN VISITING. WELL, THERE ARE SOME ISSUES WITH THE HORSES. THEY'RE CONCERNED ABOUT FLIES AND SUCH, WHETHER THAT'S THERE OR NOT, IT IS EVEN GOING BACK TO WHERE THE SCHOOL WAS THERE OR THE HORSE, THE PASTURE.

I CAN TELL YOU, IF I WAS LIVING NEXT TO IT, I'D PROBABLY RATHER HAVE THE HORSES THAN THE SCHOOL BECAUSE OF TRAFFIC IT WOULD CREATE. SO. THAT'S WHAT I'VE GOT TO SAY. I THINK THERE MAY BE SOME NEIGHBORS HERE. OKAY. ANYTHING YOU WANT TO ASK? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. I HAVE A TAMMY SAYS THAT YOU DON'T WANT TO SPEAK. IS THAT STILL TRUE? OKAY. NAME AND ADDRESS, PLEASE. TAMMY DENISON. I LIVE ON 1009 ALMONT. I LIVE DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM THE HORSES, AND I WAS RAISED ON A RANCH. I LOVE ANIMALS, BUT I DO KNOW THAT THEY DO BRING FLIES AND SO I HAVE NO ISSUES WITH ANIMALS. BUT I DON'T THINK THAT'S A GOOD IDEA TO HAVE THEM DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM THE CLUBHOUSE, NOR RIGHT ACROSS FROM RESIDENTIAL AREAS. SO THAT'S MY OPPOSITION.

OKAY. THANK YOU. I HAVE A QUESTION. SO IT WAS CLARIFIED, THOUGH, THAT THE HORSES WOULD NOT BE ON THE PROPERTY GRAZING LIKE SEVEN DAYS A WEEK. CORRECT. THEY WOULD COME BACK TO THE STABLES. I THINK WE'LL HAVE A CHANCE TO TO ASK THE APPLICANT AGAIN, BUT I THOUGHT I HEARD HIM SAY THERE WERE TWO EIGHT WEEK PERIODS. THAT'S THE PLAN, RIGHT? IS THAT WHAT Y'ALL HEARD? YEAH, IT IS TWO SEASONS. TWO EIGHT WEEK PERIODS, SOMETHING LIKE THAT. OKAY, OKAY. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION OF THIS ITEM? ALL RIGHT. AS THE APPLICANT, WOULD YOU LIKE TO COME AND ADDRESS ANY OF THE CONCERNS? I DON'T THINK SO. ALL RIGHT. ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU GUYS WOULD HAVE FOR THE THE APPLICANT? I DO HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION THAT I'VE THOUGHT OF IF YOU DON'T MIND. THE YOU SAID THAT THE PLAN IS TO JUST USE IT FOR GRAZING. IS THERE ANY POTENTIAL FOR YOU TO PARCEL IT OUT AND BUILD HOMES OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT? I MEAN, I THINK HE ADDRESSED THAT THERE MIGHT THERE'S THE POSSIBILITY OF CATTLE THAT COULD GO ON IT. I DON'T KNOW ABOUT THAT. NO, THERE'S NO PLANS ON CATTLE. WE HAVE NO PLANS AS OF NOW. I CAN'T SPEAK FOR TEN YEARS FROM NOW, BUT THERE'S NO PLAN FOR IT.

WE'RE NOT A DEVELOPER. SO. OKAY, SO THERE'S NO LIKE YOU SAID, YOU DIDN'T HAVE ANY PLANS FOR THE FUTURE. SO I JUST TRY TO GIVE IT LIFE UNTIL THERE IS PLANS, BUT THERE'S NO PLANS.

OKAY. CAN YOU ADDRESS SOME OF THE THE LIKE FLIES AND THINGS? I MEAN, WHAT I AS I GREW UP NEXT TO STABLES AND THINGS AS WELL, AND I'VE, WE ALWAYS HAVE FLIES, SO I'M KIND OF USED TO THEM, BUT I, YOU KNOW, YEAH. I MEAN, ESPECIALLY WITH, WITH SEVEN HORSES, I THINK IT WOULD A LOT LESS CHANCES. THERE ARE THERE WERE SPOTS THAT WERE EXTREMELY OVERGRAZED AND SOMEBODY ELSE'S PROPERTY ON THE CLUB. AND YES, THAT WAS AN ISSUE. BUT THAT IS MISMANAGEMENT AND WAY OVER GRAZING. AND IF IF YOU WANT TO GO MEET ME OUT THERE, I'LL SHOW YOU. WE, WE KEEP OUR PASTURES CLEAN AND WE, WE GO AND DRAG THEM REGULARLY TO MAKE SURE IT DOESN'T BECOME A PROBLEM BECAUSE I DON'T WANT THE FLIES EITHER. AND SO I WOULD HATE, HATE TO BE A BUG TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD OR TO MYSELF. AND SO UNLESS WE WENT AND PACKED 30 HORSES IN THERE, I THINK YOU WOULD START GETTING SOME ISSUES THEN. AND THAT WOULD BE THAT

[00:20:04]

WOULD BE PRETTY CLEAR. BUT I THINK THE. THE USE RIGHT NOW, IT IT WOULDN'T SEVEN HORSES WOULDN'T HAVE ENOUGH. YEAH, I THINK SO. I KNOW AND THIS IS THIS IS SOMETHING I THINK MAYBE FOR THIS CITY BECAUSE I KNOW MOCKINGBIRD HAS PLANS TO GO THROUGH. HOW WOULD THIS AFFECT MOCKINGBIRD. BECAUSE WOULD THAT NOT WOULDN'T MOCKINGBIRD BE IN THE WAY OR IS IS THAT PROPERTY IN THE WAY I. I'M SORRY, I'M JUST I, I DON'T I DON'T KNOW DOES WHERE'S THE PLAN FOR MOCKINGBIRD AND HOW DOES THIS AFFECT IT? BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY IT GOES AROUND THE POLO FIELDS OR AT LEAST IT WOULD NEED TO. SO IT LOOKS LIKE THERE'S NOT MUCH SPACE IN BETWEEN THIS PROPERTY AND THE POLO FIELDS. RIGHT. DO YOU MIND BRINGING A MAP UP FOR ME? I THINK THEY'RE WORKING ON GETTING THE MAP. SO IT'S JUST TO THE SOUTH OF THIS PROPERTY AND IT'S IN BETWEEN THE POLO FIELDS. IN THIS PROPERTY IS THE PLAN. AND BUT THAT DEPENDS ON THE PROPERTY, THE CURRENT PROPERTY OWNER DEVELOPING THE PROPERTY AND DEDICATING IT TO THE CITY. THE CITY DOES NOT OWN ANY RIGHT OF WAY AT THIS POINT IN TIME. OKAY. SO JUST JUST SOUTH OF THE PROPERTY AND IN BETWEEN THE POLO FIELDS, SO YOU CAN SEE HOW MOCKINGBIRD COMES OUT, IT WOULD GO NORTHWARD. THE CURRENT PLANS. SO THE CURRENT PLAN WOULD BE FOR THAT STREET TO ESSENTIALLY GO IN BETWEEN THAT DURING THAT. OKAY. YES THAT'S CORRECT. AND AGAIN, THAT DEPENDS ON THE RIGHT OF WAY BEING DEDICATED OR ACQUIRED BY THE CITY. OKAY. DO I GUESS MY, MY QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT THEN IS IF THAT ROAD WERE TO BE DEDICATED AND BUILT, HOW DOES THAT AFFECT GETTING YOUR HORSES ON AND OFF AND GOING FROM THE POLO CLUB TO, TO THAT AREA FOR GRAZING? I MEAN, I THINK THAT'S A BRIDGE WE'D HAVE TO CROSS THEN. BUT I MEAN, EITHER GO AROUND OR, OR I DON'T KNOW HOW THE STREET, IF IT WOULD BE A, A CROSSWALK OR IF IT'S A HIGH TRAFFIC LANE. BUT I MEAN, MAYBE AT THAT POINT WE DON'T HAVE HORSES OVER THERE BECAUSE WE COULDN'T GET TO IT. BUT I, I THINK THAT THERE'S, THERE'S WAYS YOU CAN TRAILER IN FROM THE STREET OR SOMETHING. I DON'T THE OTHER WAY. YEAH. INTERESTING. OKAY. I. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY. I WAS JUST THINKING, AND I DON'T KNOW, IS THAT SOMETHING THAT MAYBE YOU CONSIDER WHAT IF THE REASON TO PD WITH THE UNDERLINE LIKE FOR HORSES, SINCE YOU'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE CATTLE THERE. YOU SAID SO I DON'T KNOW. IS THAT SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE POSSIBLE INSTEAD OF THE THE AGRICULTURE SIGN? IT IS POSSIBLE, BUT YOU WOULD STILL NEED THE, THE UNDERLYING ZONING OF, OF A E IN ORDER TO HAVE THE USE HE'S WANTING WOULD WHAT KIND OF LIMITATIONS WOULD YOU THINK WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE IN A PD? BECAUSE I'M JUST WONDERING WHAT YOU WERE THINKING. NO, BECAUSE I KNOW ON THE PD YOU CAN PUT ON UNDERLINE FOR HORSES SINCE YOU'RE ONLY GOING TO HAVE HORSES. RIGHT. I KNOW. YEAH. SO THAT WAY THAT WILL ALSO GIVE A PEACE OF MIND TO THE NEIGHBORS THAT WILL BE USED ONLY FOR HORSES. I KNOW SOMETIMES WE HAVE PD WITH UNDERLINE FOR FURNITURE STORE OR AUTO CAR. SO I DON'T KNOW. I JUST THINKING, CAN YOU SAY THAT LAST PART AGAIN FOR AN UNDERLYING OF WHAT OF I KNOW IT'S AGRICULTURE, BUT WITH THE TO BE USED FOR HORSES ONLY AND NO CATTLE OR ANY OTHER. I SEE. THAT THAT IS POSSIBLE. WE HAVE DONE THAT BEFORE. SO WE.

WE COULD CONSIDER THAT. YEAH. AND I DON'T KNOW IF THE APPLICANT, IF YOU WANTED TO EXPLORE ON THAT TO. YEAH. I MEAN, THERE'S THERE'S NO PLANS FOR ANY OTHER TYPE OF ANIMAL.

AND IF WE DIDN'T HAVE TO CHANGE THE ZONING, WE WOULDN'T JUST NOT HAVE TO MESS WITH CHANGE ANYTHING. SO JUST THE ONLY REASON TO CHANGE IT IS SO WE COULD, COULD USE IT WITHOUT HAVING TO BREAK ANY RULES. YEAH, JUST AN IDEA. IT'S NOT A BAD IDEA. JUST TO BE CLEAR THAT WHAT THE RECOMMENDATION WOULD STILL REQUIRE A CHANGE TO ZONING, I DON'T KNOW THAT THAT WOULD COMPLETELY ADDRESS SOME OF THE CONCERNS. THE OBJECTION WE RECEIVED WAS SPECIFIC TO

[00:25:02]

THIS TYPE OF USE NOT BEING SUITABLE TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE AREA. SO IF THE APPLICANT WAS AMENABLE, WE COULD GO BACK THROUGH THE PROCESS TO TRY TO DO IT THAT WAY. BUT AGAIN, I DON'T KNOW THAT THAT WOULD SATISFY THE OBJECTIONS. THANK YOU. IT SOUNDS LIKE I THINK WHAT WHAT SHE SAYS IS, IS A GOOD POINT. JUST THAT WITH EVERYTHING BEING SF ONE AROUND IT. AND I, I KNOW THAT WE'VE HAD STUFF COME THROUGH HERE ALREADY FOR MORE STUFF TO BE SF ONE AND FURTHER TO JUST BE THIS BIG FIELD IN THE MIDDLE OF IT ALL SEEMS INCONGRUENT WITH WHAT WHAT IT WAS INTENDED TO BE. OBVIOUSLY IT WAS INTENDED TO BE A SCHOOL, BUT I GUESS, I MEAN, IT LOOKS LIKE THEY COULD AT SOME POINT IT COULD IF IT STAYED FS SF ONE I'M SORRY THAT THEY COULD DO MORE HOMES THERE AND THEY COULD THEY COULD DO THAT, BUT THAT WOULD BE THE. IT ALMOST SEEMS LIKE THAT WOULD BE THE MOST SENSIBLE. BUT IT DOES SEEM A LITTLE BIT IN THE MIDDLE OF EVERYTHING. I THINK THAT'S WHAT THE. THAT'S WHAT SOME OF THESE THAT I WAS READING WERE TALKING ABOUT. YES. SO. BUT IF, IF, IF THAT NEIGHBORHOOD GOT DEVELOPED AND IT WAS SF ONE, BUT WE OWNING IT AREN'T BUILDERS AND HAD NO PLANS TO BUILD HOUSES THERE. IT WOULD STILL BE AN EMPTY FIELD WITH MESQUITE IN IT. RIGHT? SO MEANING, MEANING WE DON'T HAVE ANY PLANS TO BUILD HOUSES THERE. SO IT WOULD ALWAYS BE AN OPEN FIELD, RIGHT? UNLESS WE WENT AND SOLD IT OR HOUSES. RIGHT. I, I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU GUYS WOULD END UP DOING IF THAT WERE THE CASE. I MEAN, THAT THAT'S A QUESTION FOR, YOU KNOW, WHAT WOULD YOU DO IF YOU, IF YOU NEED IF YOU NEED SOME OTHER LAND TO, TO GRAZE THE HORSES, YOU KNOW, WHETHER YOU GO SOMEWHERE ELSE OR WHETHER YOU JUST LEAVE IT VACANT, I DON'T KNOW, I GUESS THAT'S A, THAT'S A CHOICE. BUT YEAH, YEAH. ANYWAYS, ANYTHING ELSE FOR STAFF OR FOR THE APPLICANT? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU SO MUCH. I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND WE WILL GO TO THE COMMISSION FOR ANY MOTIONS. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE. I'LL SECOND. ALL RIGHT. I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE REQUEST FROM COMMISSIONER BERRY AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER LAFOY.

IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL RIGHT. MOTION PASSES, 4 TO 2. THERE WAS NO NEED FOR A SUPERMAJORITY BECAUSE OF THE VOTE. NOT. YEAH, NOT FOR PNC. GOOD TO KNOW. ALL RIGHT. THE

[5. - Hold a public hearing and consider a request by Crystal Kelly, on behalf of Walmart Stores, for a Zone Change from PD, Planned Development District for a Shopping Center to an amended PD, Planned Development District for a Shopping Center on Lot 1C, Block 33, Northgate Addition, Section 26, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located at southeast corner of the intersection of Northcrest Drive and Briarwood Avenue.) (DISTRICT: 1) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

NEXT ITEM ON OUR PUBLIC HEARINGS IS ITEM NUMBER FIVE. HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST BY CRYSTAL KELLY ON BEHALF OF WALMART STORES FOR A ZONE CHANGE FROM PD PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR A SHOPPING CENTER TO AN AMENDED PD PLAN. DISTRICT PLAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FOR A SHOPPING CENTER ON LOT ONE C BLOCK 33, NORTH GATE ADDITION, SECTION 26. CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF NORTHCREST DRIVE AND BRIARWOOD AVENUE. THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN, COMMISSIONERS, SENIOR PLANNER TO PRESENT ITEM NUMBER FIVE, ITEM NUMBER FIVE IN THE AGENDA SYSTEM CHANGE SUBMITTED BY DAVID UPTON FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT 4517 NORTH MIDLAND DRIVE FOR AN EXPANSION TO THE CURBSIDE PICKUP AREA. THE CURRENT ZONING FOR THE PROPERTY IS PD FOR A SHOPPING CENTER TO THE NORTH. WE HAVE A PD FOR A SHOPPING CENTER IN RR.

TO THE SOUTH WE HAVE TO THE SOUTH AND EAST. WE HAVE A PD FOR A SHOPPING CENTER. TO THE WEST WE HAVE PD FOR A SHOPPING CENTER. OUR REGIONAL RETAIL MF 16. THE PROPOSED USE IS AMENDED PD FOR A SHOPPING CENTER. THE CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY IS A RETAIL STORE TO THE NORTH, ANOTHER RETAIL STORE TO THE SOUTH OF RESTAURANTS AND RETAIL STORES. TO THE EAST IS A GAS STATION, AND TO THE WEST ARE APARTMENTS. HERE'S THE SIDE PHOTO ON NORTHCREST DRIVE.

LOOKING EAST, THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATES THIS AREA AS COMMUNITY. COMMERCIAL IS INTENDED TO ACCOMMODATE A RANGE OF COMMERCIAL USES THAT SERVE THE BROADER COMMUNITY, INCLUDING RETAIL, RESTAURANTS AND SERVICES. IT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE TCT PLAN. NO OBJECTIONS WERE RECEIVED. THEREFORE, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOLLOWING THE CONDITIONS AND I'M OPEN TO ANY QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE ANY. ANYTHING FOR STAFF. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. BEATRICE. OPENING UP THE PUBLIC HEARING. IS THE APPLICANT

[00:30:02]

PRESENT? NAME AND ADDRESS FOR US, PLEASE. GOOD AFTERNOON. DAVID UPTON WITH KIMLEY-HORN 6160 WARREN PARKWAY, FRISCO, TEXAS. AND I'M JUST HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE. NOTHING OTHER THAN WHAT'S ALREADY BEEN PRESENTED. OKAY. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS REQUEST? SEEING NONE, IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO IS OPPOSED OR WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION? ALSO SEEING NONE, I WILL CLOSE OUR PUBLIC HEARING. WE'LL GO TO THE COMMISSION. I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE REQUEST FROM COMMISSIONER BERRY. SECOND AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER SISNIEGA. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL RIGHT. LET'S VOTE. MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. ITEM NUMBER SIX. HOLD A PUBLIC

[6. - Hold a public hearing and consider a request by Travis Knibbe, on behalf of Permian Basin Habitat for Humanity, for a Zone Change from MF-22, Multiple-Family Dwelling District to SF-3, Single-Family Dwelling District on Lots 1, 2, 15, and 16, Block 5, Eastover Third Extension, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located at the southeast corner of the intersection of East Illinois Avenue and Donald Street.) (DISTRICT: 2) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST BY TRAVIS NYBY. SORRY IF I BUTCHERED THAT ON BEHALF OF PERMIAN BASIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY FOR A ZONE CHANGE FROM MF22 MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT TO SF THREE SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT ON LOTS ONE, TWO, 15 AND 16 BLOCK FIVE EAST OVER THIRD EXTENSION CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF EAST ILLINOIS AVENUE AND DONALD STREET. THANK YOU. CHAIRMAN. COMMISSIONERS, OUR SENIOR PLANNER, TO PRESENT ITEM NUMBER SIX. ITEM NUMBER SIX ON THE AGENDA IS ZONE CHANGE FOR THE PROPERTY OWNED BY PERMIAN BASIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, LOCATED AT 1710 EAST ILLINOIS. 210 AND 212 DONNA STREET TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. THE CURRENT ZONING IS MF 22 TO THE NORTH IS ZONE. LIE TO THE SOUTH AND EAST AND WEST IS ALSO ZONED MF 22. THE PROPOSED ZONING IS SF THREE. THE CURRENT USES VACANT LAND AS WELL AS THE PROPERTIES TO THE EAST, WEST AND NORTH TO THE SOUTH IS RESIDENTIAL. THE PROPOSED USE IS RESIDENTIAL. HERE'S THE SIDE PHOTO ON EAST ILLINOIS AVENUE AND SOUTH. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANS DESIGNATE THIS AREA'S URBAN RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM, WHICH ENCOURAGES SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. THE REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE. A SPECIAL EXCEPTION IS ALSO HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR THIS. PROPERTIES TO BRING THE PROPOSED LAWS INTO COMPLIANCE FOR LOT AND WIDTH AND DEPTH. NO OBJECTIONS WERE RECEIVED. THEREFORE, STAFF RECEIVED APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST. THANK YOU. I'M OPEN TO ANY QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. THANK YOU. OPENING UP THE PUBLIC HEARING. IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? ALL RIGHT. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS REQUEST? ANYONE HERE WHO IS OPPOSED OR WISHES MORE INFORMATION? ALL RIGHT. I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. WE'LL GO TO THE COMMISSION. APPROVED APPLICATION. ALL RIGHT. I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE REQUEST FROM COMMISSIONER MARTIN. SECOND AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER SISNIEGA. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? LET'S VOTE. MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU. ITEM NUMBER SEVEN.

[7. - Hold a public hearing and consider a request by Citadel Construction Company, on behalf of Outkick Investments Partners, LLC, for a Zone Change from MF-16, Multiple-Family Dwelling District to PD, Planned Development District for a Housing Development on Lot 1, Block 1, Renew Life Church, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located on the north side of Occidental Parkway, approximately 310 feet east of North State Highway 349.) (DISTRICT: 1) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST BY CITADEL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ON BEHALF OF OUTKICK INVESTMENTS PARTNERS, LLC FOR A ZONE CHANGE FROM MF16 MULTIPLE FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT TO PD PLANS FOR A HOUSING DEVELOPMENT ON LOT ONE, BLOCK ONE RENEW LIFE, CHURCH CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF OCCIDENTAL PARKWAY, APPROXIMATELY 310FT EAST OF NORTH STATE HIGHWAY 349. THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN, COMMISSIONERS, OUR SENIOR PLANNER, TO PRESENT ITEM NUMBER SEVEN, ITEM NUMBER SEVEN. THE AGENDA SAYS ZONE CHANGE. SUBMITTED BY OUTKICK INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1201 OCCIDENTAL PARKWAY TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION FOR APARTMENT COMPLEX. THE CURRENT ZONING IS MF 16 TO THE NORTHWEST AND EAST ARE SF THREE. TO THE SOUTH IS A PD FOR A HOUSING DEVELOPMENT. THE PROPOSED ZONING IS PD FOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT. THE CURRENT USES VACANT LAND. THE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH ARE SINGLE FAMILY TO THE EAST AND WEST IS VACANT LAND. THE PROPOSED USE IS AN APARTMENT COMPLEX. HERE'S THE SITE ON OCCIDENTAL. LOOKING NORTH, THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATES THIS AREA URBAN, RESIDENTIAL, MEDIUM AND URBAN MEDIUM DESIGNATION ENCOURAGES A VARIETY OF RESIDENTIAL HOUSING TYPES, INCLUDING SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOMES, SINGLE DETACHED HOMES, TOWNHOMES AND LIMITED

[00:35:03]

AND MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT. THIS IS A COMPREHENSIVE REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. NO OBJECTIONS WERE RECEIVED. THEREFORE, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. THANK YOU AND OPEN TO ANY QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. THANK YOU. BEATRICE. OPENING UP THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? NAME AND ADDRESS, PLEASE. HELLO, MY NAME IS TAYLOR TUCKER. ADDRESS IS 4705 120TH BOULEVARD IN LUBBOCK, TEXAS. AND I'M AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE. JUST JUST QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS OR WHAT DO YOU ACTUALLY HAVE? PRETTY MUCH THE DEVELOPER, CIVIL ENGINEER AND THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD TO ADDRESS ANY QUESTIONS.

WE'VE SPOKEN TO ELIZABETH AND STAFF ON THIS. WE'VE GONE THROUGH PRE-DEVELOPMENT, TRIED TO COVER OUR BASES ALL THE WAY AROUND, SO WE JUST WANTED TO BE HERE TO ANSWER ANY CONCERNS OR COMMENTS THAT Y'ALL MIGHT HAVE. ALL RIGHTY. THANK YOU. APPRECIATE IT. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS REQUEST? SEEING NONE, IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO IS OPPOSED OR WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION? ALSO SEEING NONE, I'LL CLOSE OUR PUBLIC HEARING WITH THE COMMISSION. LIKE TO ASK ANY QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT THEN I WILL GO TO THE COMMISSION FOR ANY MOTIONS. MOTION TO APPROVE. I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THIS REQUEST FROM COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON. SECOND AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER MARTIN. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT, WE'LL VOTE. YES, MA'AM. MY VOTE AND MINE HAS NOT COME UP. LET ME. SEE. OH, THERE IT IS. MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU. ITEM NUMBER EIGHT.

[8. - Hold a public hearing and consider a request by Raquel Alvarado, on behalf of Yan Wai Chan for a Specific Use Designation with Term for the sale of all alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption, in a restaurant on a 0.80-acre tract of land out of Section 32 and 33, Block 39, T-1-S, T&P RR Co. Survey, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located on the south side of West Wall Street, approximately 515 feet northeast of the intersection of Thomason Drive and West Wall Street.) (DISTRICT: 2) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST BY RAQUEL ALVARADO ON BEHALF OF YAN WEI CHAN, FOR A SPECIFIC USE DESIGNATION WITH TERM FOR THE SALE OF ALL ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES FOR ON PREMISES CONSUMPTION IN A RESTAURANT ON A POINT EIGHT ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF SECTION 32 AND 33, BLOCK 39, T, ONE S, T AND P RAILROAD COMMISSION SURVEY. CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WEST WALL STREET, APPROXIMATELY 515FT NORTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF THOMPSON DRIVE AND WEST WALL STREET.

THANK YOU, CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS. ALEXIS, TO PRESENT ITEM NUMBER EIGHT. IT IS A NECESSITY FOR RAINA'S MEXICAN RESTAURANT. THE APPLICANT IS RAQUEL ALVARADO, PROPERTY OWNERS. WEI CHEN FOR 3701 WEST WALL STREET FOR THE SALE OF ALCOHOL AND CONSUMPTION.

ON PREMISE. IT IS FOR A NEW RESTAURANT. THEY MOVED LOCATION, SO IT'S CONSIDERED A NEW RESTAURANT. THE AREA OF THE BUSINESS IS 3583FT■S. THE SERVICEABLE AREA FOR ALCOHOL WILL BE 1482. THE HOURS OF OPERATION ARE MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY FROM 6 A.M. TO 10 P.M.

SATURDAY FROM 6 A.M. TO 3 P.M. AND SUNDAY FROM 7 TO 3. THE HOURS OF ALCOHOL SALES WILL BE MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY, 7 A.M. TO 10 P.M. SATURDAY FROM 7 A.M. TO THREE, AND SUNDAY FROM 12 P.M. NOON TO 3 P.M. THE CURRENT ZONING IS IN PART COMMERCIAL AND IN PART REGIONAL RETAIL.

THE SURROUNDING ZONING IS REGIONAL RETAIL. TO THE NORTH SOUTH IS COMMERCIAL. TO THE EAST IS REGIONAL RETAIL IN PART WITH COMMERCIAL IN PART AND WEST IS COMMERCIAL. THE USE.

RIGHT NOW THEY ARE IN BUSINESS. THEY'RE NOT SELLING ALCOHOL JUST YET. THE SURROUNDING USES TO THE NORTH. TO THE SOUTH ARE BARS. TO THE EAST IS A GAS STATION. AND TO THE WEST IS A HOTEL. THE PROPOSED USE IS A RESTAURANT. THIS IS THE VIEW FROM WEST WALL STREET. LOOKING SOUTH, THE REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE TALL CITY PLAN AND WE DID CHECK THERE'S NO SCHOOLS OR CHURCHES WITHIN 300FT. STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL. WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY OBJECTIONS JUST WITH THE STANDARD CD CONDITIONS. I'M OPEN TO ANY QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF. THANK YOU ALEXIS. THANK YOU. OPENING UP THE PUBLIC HEARING. IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT OKAY. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO IS WANTING TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF

[00:40:06]

THIS REQUEST? SEEING NONE, IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO IS OPPOSED OR WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION? SEEING NONE, I WILL CLOSE. OUR PUBLIC HEARING, WILL GO TO THE COMMISSION. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE REQUEST. I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THIS REQUEST FROM COMMISSIONER SISNIEGA AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? LET'S VOTE. MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU. ITEM NUMBER NINE. HOLD A PUBLIC

[9. - Hold a public hearing and consider a request by Christopher Salazar for a zone change from C, Commercial District to 2F, Two-Family Dwelling District on the south half of Lot 8 and all of Lot 9, Block 100, Original Town, City and County of Midland, Texas. (Generally located on the west side of South Dallas Street, approximately 105 feet north of East Kentucky Avenue) (DISTRICT: 2) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

HEARING AND CONSIDER A REQUEST BY CHRISTOPHER SALAZAR FOR A ZONE CHANGE FROM C COMMERCIAL DISTRICT TO TWO F TWO FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT ON THE SOUTH HALF OF LOT EIGHT AND ALL OF LOT NINE, BLOCK 100. ORIGINAL TOWN, CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF SOUTH DALLAS STREET, APPROXIMATELY 105FT NORTH OF EAST KENTUCKY AVENUE. GOOD AFTERNOON, CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS. MADELINE PLANNER TO PRESENT ITEM NINE, ITEM NINE ON THE AGENDA IS THE ZONE CHANGE REQUEST SUBMITTED BY CHRISTOPHER SALAZAR FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 308 SOUTH DALLAS STREET TO CORRECT THE PROPERTY'S CURRENT ZONING DESIGNATION, WHICH DOES NOT ACCURATELY REFLECT REFLECT ITS EXISTING USE AS A DUPLEX. HE DOES WANT TO SELL THE DUPLEX, AND THAT'S WHY HE'S GOING THROUGH THE ZONE. CHANGE. THE CURRENT ZONING IS COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, AND THE SURROUNDING ZONING IS ALL COMMERCIAL. THE PROPOSED ZONING IS TWO F TWO FAMILY DWELLING DISTRICT. THE CURRENT USES A DUPLEX. TO THE NORTH IS THE OTHER SIDE OF THE DUPLEX AND SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS. TO THE SOUTH IS COMMERCIAL AND TO THE EAST AND WEST IS SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS.

HERE'S A SITE PHOTO ON SOUTH DALLAS STREET LOOKING WEST AND THE LAND USE DESIGNATION IS URBAN MEDIUM, WHICH SUPPORTS THE MIDST OF MIX OF COMPLEMENTARY USES, INCLUDING MULTIFAMILY HOUSING. THE REQUEST IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE TALL CITY TOMORROW PLAN AND NO OBJECTIONS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED, SO STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST. THANK YOU, AND I'M OPEN TO ANY QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MADAM? OKAY. THANK YOU. OPENING UP THE PUBLIC HEARING. IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT? SEEING NONE. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THIS REQUEST? SEEING NONE. IS THERE ANYONE HERE WHO IS OPPOSED OR WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION? SEEING NONE, I WILL CLOSE OUR PUBLIC HEARING. WE WILL GO TO THE COMMISSION. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE REQUEST. I HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST FROM COMMISSIONER SISNIEGA. A SECOND AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER LAFOY. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? LET'S VOTE. HOW WOULD YOU LIKE TO VOTE FOR THIS? NO. OKAY. MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU. AS THEY'RE WORKING ON THAT, I'LL GO AHEAD AND MOVE ON. NOW WE'RE

[11. - Motion approving, with staff’s recommended conditions, a Preliminary Plat of Devon Addition, Section 11, being a 1.173-acre tract of land out of section 8, Block 40, T-2-S, T&P Railway Co. Survey, City and County of Midland, Texas (Generally located on the south side of Younger Road, approximately 600 feet east of Norden Drive.) (DISTRICT: 4) (DEVELOPMENT SERVICES) (QUALITY OF LIFE AND PLACE)]

MOVING ON TO OUR MISCELLANEOUS SECTION. ITEM NUMBER TEN HAS BEEN PULLED. SO THAT LEADS US TO ITEM NUMBER 11 MOTION APPROVING WITH STAFF'S RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS. A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF DEVIN ADDITION, SECTION 11 BEING A 1.173 ACRE TRACT OF LAND OUT OF SECTION EIGHT, BLOCK 40 T, TWO S, T AND P RAILWAY COMMISSION SURVEY. CITY AND COUNTY OF MIDLAND, TEXAS. GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF YOUNGER ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 600FT EAST OF NORDEN DRIVE. GOOD AFTERNOON, CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS PLANNER TO PRESENT ITEM 11. ITEM 11 ON THE AGENDA IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTED BY SEA OR LAND SURVEYING ON BEHALF OF VALVES AND CRANES AND CRIMSON CRANE REPAIR FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 113 YOUNGER ROAD, FOR ENTITLEMENTS AND CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO PLOT 1.173 ACRES INTO ONE LOT. THE PROPERTY IS ZONED T P TECHNOLOGY TECHNOLOGY PARK DISTRICT IN THE SURROUNDING ZONING IS ALSO TECHNOLOGY PARK DISTRICT. THE CURRENT USES AND EQUIPMENT REPAIR SHOP WITH AN EXTERMINATING COMPANY TO THE NORTH AND EQUIPMENT RENTAL TO THE SOUTH AND VACANT TO THE EAST AND WEST. THE LAND USE DESIGNATION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR THIS PROPERTY, AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. THANK YOU AND I'M OPEN FOR ANY QUESTIONS. ANY QUESTIONS, ANY QUESTIONS?

[00:45:04]

ALL RIGHT. DO I HEAR ANY MOTIONS? I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THIS REQUEST FROM COMMISSIONER RICHARDSON. SECOND AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER SISNIEGA. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL RIGHT. LET'S VOTE. MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THAT LEADS US TO THE END OF OUR AGENDA. SO AT 417,

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.